Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 October 2012
1 Die architektonischen Terrakotten Kleinasiens.
2 Charisterion Orlandos iv (1967) 366–8.Google Scholar
3 Etruscan and Roman Architecture (1970).
4 Küçük Asya'da bulunan Roma imparatorluk çaǧi Tapinaklari (Istanbul 1970).Google Scholar
5 Teatri dassici in Asia minore 3 vols. (1966-1970). A fourth volume with conclusions is promised.Google Scholar
6 Ist. Mitt, xiii–xiv (1963-1964) 73–84.Google Scholar
7 Akurgal, Ekrem, İstanbul, Ark. Müz. Yilligi xi–xii (1964) 216–24Google Scholar. Cf. Antike Kunst viii (1965) 99–103.Google Scholar
8 Ist. Mitt, xvi (1966) 95–9Google Scholar, Rivista Arch. dassica xvi (1964) 13–25.Google Scholar
9 Ist. Mitt, xvii (1967) 115–27.Google Scholar
10 Belleten 123 (1967) 331–4.Google Scholar
11 Ist. Mitt, xv (1965) 24–42.Google Scholar
12 Antike Kunst xiii (1970) pl. 36.Google Scholar
13 Rev. arch. 1966, 2, 195–222.Google Scholar
14 Ist. Mitt, xvii (1967) 144–50.Google Scholar
15 Antike Plastik vi (1967) 89–93.Google Scholar
16 Ist. Mitt, xvii (1967) 168–72.Google Scholar
17 Jahrb. Berl. Museen xii (1970) 191–210, with references for the various recent attributions.Google Scholar
18 Belleten 125 (1968) 1–24.Google Scholar
19 See especially Laubscher, H. P., Ist. Mitt, xvi (1966) 115–29.Google Scholar
20 M. Floriani-Squarciapino in the volume of that name (1965) 229-33.
21 Ist. Mitt, xvii (1967) 211–17.Google Scholar
22 Ferrari, Gloria, Il Commercio dei Sarcophagi asiatici (Rome 1966).Google Scholar
23 FRS lx (1970) 120–41, and see below.Google Scholar
24 Essays E.S.G. Robinson (1968) 10–15.Google Scholar
25 Essays Robinson (1968) 111–24.Google Scholar
26 Bass, , AA 1962, 537–64Google Scholar; Bass, , Archaeology under Water (revised ed. 1970) 132–46.Google Scholar
27 See now Bass, and Doorninck, F. H. van, Jr., AFA lxxv (1971) 27–37Google Scholar; for the techniques used cf. Archaeology under Water, 146-50 and Bass, and Katsev, M. L., Archaeology xxi 3 (1968) 164–73.Google Scholar
28 Bass, and Fernald, R., Nat. Geog. Soc. Research Reports, 1963 Projects, 15–22.Google Scholar
29 Bass and Katzev, loc. cit.; Bass, and Joline, L. T., Expedition xi 1 (1968) 9–12; Archaeology under Water, 47-8 and pls. 23-4.Google Scholar
30 AFA lxxi (1967) 329–34.Google Scholar
31 Bass, G. F., ‘Cape Gelidonya: A Bronze Age Shipwreck’ (Trans. Am. Philos. Soc., lvii 8, 1967).Google Scholar
32 Fairbridge, R. W., Physics and Chemistry of the Earth iv (1961) 99–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar; on the basis of his conclusions A. Bammer has tried to explain the various levels of different stages of the Artemision at Ephesus: Öjh xlvii (1964-1965) 126–31. But the attempt seems to us unconvincing.Google Scholar
33 A paper delivered at the XXIII Colston Research Symposium, Bristol, 1971, to be published in Colston Papers xxiii; see also Blackman's paper in the same volume. C. A. Wendel has suggested that the harbour of Ephesus was put out of use not by silting (as Strabo would lead us to expect) but by a large vertical displacement of coastal land blocks, connected with the famous earthquake of A.D. 17: Archaeology xxii 4 (October 1969) 322–4.Google Scholar
34 ‘Dardanos şehri tümülüsde yeni bulunan Grekçe kitâbeler’, Tarih Dergisi xiii, no. 17–18 (Istanbul 1963).Google Scholar
35 Ist. Mitt, xvi (1966) 100–14.Google Scholar
36 Anatolia (now Anadolu) x (1966) 185–92.Google Scholar
37 Belleten 116 (1965) 585–97.Google Scholar
38 Boehringer, E., AA 1966, 477–8.Google Scholar
39 Belleten 120 (1966) 528–37Google Scholar. Subsequently published independently, with copious photographs and a list of the known decrees of Cyme, by Hönle, Augusta, AA 1967, 46–62.Google Scholar
40 Belleten 120 (1966) 525–8.Google Scholar
41 Cook, J. M., BSA lxiii (1968) 33–40.Google Scholar
42 For the work at the Demeter sanctuary see now Bohtz, C. H. and Albert, W.-D., AA 1970, 391–412.Google Scholar
43 On the work at the Asclepieum see now Ziegenaus, O., AA 1970, 176–201.Google Scholar
44 Tempel der ägyptischen Götter in Griechenland und an der West küste Kleinasiens (1970).
45 Kasper, S. and Albert, W.-D., AA 1970, 71–85.Google Scholar
46 Tuğrul, Lütfi, İstanbul Ark. Müz. Yilhgi xi–xii (1964) 147–63.Google Scholar
47 Ist. Mitt, xvii (1967) 218–47.Google Scholar
48 Anat. Stud, xix (1969) 41–98.Google Scholar
49 Ibid. xvii (1967) 49-100.
50 Ibid. xiv (1964) 35-7.
51 İstanbul Ark. Müz. Yilligi xiii–xiv (1966) 229, pls. 68–9.Google Scholar
52 İzmit (Nicomedie) (Istanbul 1964).Google Scholar
53 İstanbul Ark. Müz. Yilligi xi–xii (1964) 212–14, pls. 43-5.Google Scholar
54 Belleten 128 (1968) 527–51.Google Scholar
55 AA 1969, 377–85.Google Scholar
56 Die Kulturelle und Künstlerische Hellenisierung der Küsten des Mittelmeeres durch die Stadt Phokaia (1966).
57 MDOG xcviii (1967) 5–23.Google Scholar
58 Ist. Mitt, xvii (1967) 63–71.Google Scholar
59 See Otten, H., Sprachliche Stellung und Datierung des Madduwatta-Textes (Studien zu den Bogazköy-Texten 11, 1969)Google Scholar; for a useful brief discussion of this question and of the evidence for Mycenaeans in Western Asia Minor, see Mellink, , AJA lxxv 1971) 168–9 (with bibliography).Google Scholar
60 Preliminary reports in BASOR Nos. 182 (April 1966) 2–54Google Scholar; 186 (April 1967) 17-52, and 187 (October 1967) 9-62; 191 October 1968) 2-41; 199 (October 1970) 7-58. See also Hanfmann, G. M. A. and Detweiler, A. H., Archaeology xix 2 (April 1966) 90–7Google Scholar; Mitten, D. G., Biblical Archaeologist xxix (May 1966) 38–68.Google Scholar
61 Published by Hanfmann, and Masson, O., Kadmos vi 2 (1967) 123–34, together with one inscribed clay tablet in the Museum at Eskihisar (Stratonicea) (cf. n. 119).Google Scholar
62 For a discussion of the Pactolus gold refinery and its significance see Hanfmann, and Waldbaum, Jane C. in Near Eastern Archaeology in the Twentieth Century (1970) 310–15Google Scholar. In a dump in the level beneath the cupellation basins was found a sherd with a graffito tentatively read as KUVAṾ, i.e. Cybele; see Gusmani, R., Kadmos viii 2 (1969) 158–61.Google Scholar
63 Cf. Neumann, G., Kadmos iv (1965) 159–64.Google Scholar
64 Hanfmann, and Waldbaum, , Archaeology xxii 4 (October 1969) 264–9.Google Scholar
65 Calif. Stud. Class. Arch, iii (1970) 55–89.Google Scholar
66 Ibid, i (1968) 139-54.
67 Hommages à Marcel Renard iii (Coll. Latomus 103, 1969 288–95.Google Scholar
68 Boysal, Y., Anadolu xi (1967) 46–7 and pl. 23Google Scholar; Boysal also discusses and illustrates (48 and pl. 22) the three-handled piriform jar found at Çerkez and mentioned in our last report. It dates from LH IIIB and may be Rhodian; cf. Hanfmann, G. M. A. and Waldbaum, Jane C., AJA lxxii (1968) 52.Google Scholar
69 Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi (henceforth Dergi) xvii 2 (1968) 73–6.Google Scholar
70 Dergi xvii 2 (1968) 105–16.Google Scholar
71 Anatolia (now Anadolu) ix (1965) 29–160.Google Scholar
71a See now Langman, G., Festschrift F. Eichler (1967) 103–123. In this volume, which has appeared hors de série as a Beiblatt of the ÖJh, there is a new attack by W. Alzinger on the problem of Koressos (pp. 1-9).Google Scholar
72 Ist. Mitt, xviii (1968) 238–58Google Scholar. See also Fleischer, R. in Festschrift F. Eichler (1967) 23–71.Google Scholar
73 Wiener Studien lxxix (1966) 592–7.Google Scholar
74 See Bammer, A.AA 1968, 400–23 with reconstructionGoogle Scholar; cf. ÖJh xlviii (1966-1967) Beibl. 21–44.Google Scholar
75 Figurines of Ephesian Artemis are studied by Coleman, J.R., HSCP lxx (1965) 111–15.Google Scholar
76 Gültekin, H. and Baran, M., Dergi xiii 2 (1964) 125–33.Google Scholar
77 Alzinger, W., ÖJh xlviii (1966-1967) 61–72; W. Dressler, ibid. 73-6.Google Scholar
78 Kasper, S., Öst. arch. Inst., Grabungen 1966, 12–16.Google Scholar
79 For the site and its history see BSA liii–liv (1958-1959) 20Google Scholar; for the testimonia BCH xc (1966) 198–206, cfGoogle Scholar. Rev. phil. xli (1967) 36–40 (in an article by L. Robert on inscriptions of Ephesus).Google Scholar
80 Ist. Mitt, xviii (1968) 212–20Google Scholar; Bonnet Jahrbücher 169 (1969) 117–29.Google Scholar
81 Charneux, P., BCH xc (1966) 156–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82 Arch. Reports 1959-1960, 48; cfGoogle Scholar. Greeks in Ionia and the East (1962) 181.Google Scholar
83 Ist. Mitt, xv (1965) 90–103.Google Scholar
84 Ist. Mitt, xv (1965) 43–64, xvii (1967) 128-43.Google Scholar
85 Alt-Milet fig. 4 — Ruinen von Milet fig. 9. We are greatly indebted to Professor Kleiner for providing material.
86 Milet, ii 4 (1968).Google Scholar
87 Ist. Mitt, xviii (1968) 87–160.Google Scholar
88 Ist. Mitt, xvii (1967) 279–90.Google Scholar
89 Herrmann, P., Ist. Mitt, xv (1965) 71–90.Google Scholar
90 Pekáry, T., Ist. Mitt, xv (1965) 121–3.Google Scholar
91 Published in Ist. Mitt, xvii (1967) 173–94.Google Scholar
92 Die archaischen Skulpturen von Didyma (1970).
93 Klio lii (1970) 149–61Google Scholar. A sherd with a Carian inscription from Didyma, Ist. Mitt, xiii–xiv (1964) 57 no. 64.Google Scholar
94 Laodicée du Lycos, le nymphée (1969).
95 In ASAA xli–xlii (1963-1964, published 1965).Google Scholar
96 Full preliminary reports on the campaigns of 1962-64 and 1965-68 have appeared in ASAA xliii–xliv (1965-1966) 401–546; xlv-xlvi (1967-68) 539-90Google Scholar. For 1969 see Anat. Stud. xx (1970) 14–16. We are greatly indebted to Professor Levi for information and photographs.Google Scholar
97 See ASAA xliii–xliv, 479–546Google Scholar. Levi has published the jewellery from one Hellenistic tomb in Boll. d'Arte xlix (1964) 199–217.Google Scholar
98 ASAA xliii–xliv, 547–67.Google Scholar
99 ASAA xlv–xlvi, 437–86.Google Scholar
100 Labraunda ii 1, Pottery of Classical and later Date, Terracotta Lamps, and Glass, by P. Hellstrom (1965); iii 1, The Greek Inscriptions, part 1, by J. Crampa (1969).
101 Cf. BSA lii (1957) 97–100.Google Scholar
102 Gestalt und Geschichte, Festschrift Schefold (1967) 133–45.Google Scholar
103 J. and L. Robert prefer our second alternative, C. B. Welles preferred our first.
104 Report on 1968 season: Anadolu xi (1967) 39–43; the pottery found up to 1968 was published by Boysal in his Katalog, pls. 34-6 (n. 106 infra). Dr. Boysal kindly provided the photographs Figs. 11-12.Google Scholar
105 Arch. Reports 1964-1965 55Google Scholar. For 1963 see Dergi xiii 2 (1964) 81–85Google Scholar; Belleten 121 (1967) 67–83Google Scholar. For 1964 see Dergi xiv (1965) 123–6.Google Scholar
106 Katalog der Vasen in Museum in Bodrum, I. Mykenisch-Protogeometrisch (1969). For the Dirmil tomb see Arch. Reports 1964-1965 56.Google Scholar
107 Anadolu xi (1967) 32–56.Google Scholar
108 Preliminary report in Acta Arch. xxxviii (1967) 29–58. Professor Jeppese n has kindly sent us a report on the 1970 season.Google Scholar
109 Taken from op. cit. 54, fig. 33.
110 Jeppesen refers to Pliny's enigmatic words about the sculptors (NH xxxvi 30): ‘priusque quam peragerent regina obit. non tamen recesserunt nisi absolute iam …’
111 Jeppesen, K. and Strong, D., Acta Arch. xxxv (1964) 195–203Google Scholar; cf. Arch. Reports 1964-1965, 56 and fig. 24.Google Scholar
112 See his ‘Siedlungen und Bauten auf der Halbinsel von Halikarnassos’, Ist. Mitt. Beiheft 3 (1970).Google Scholar
113 Klio li (1969) 117–75.Google Scholar
114 Rev. Phil. xli (1967) 36–7Google Scholar. The facts: BSA 1 (1955) 115.Google Scholar
115 Belleten 114 (1965) 245–56.Google Scholar
116 Dergi xiv (1965) 87–102.Google Scholar
117 Anat. Stud. xix (1969) 179–82.Google Scholar
118 Anadolu xii (1968) 81–93, with a brief survey of Carian tomb types from the Mycenaean to classical periods.Google Scholar
119 AJA lxxii (1968) 51–56Google Scholar; cf. Boysal, Y., Anadolu xi (1967) 48. For the tablet cf. n. 61.Google Scholar
120 See Kadish, B., AJA lxxiii (1969) 49–65; ibid. lxxv (1971) 121-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
121 Our account is based on the published preliminary reports, for 1967: Dergi xvi 2 (1967) 133–59Google Scholar; for 1968: Dergi xvii 2 (1968) 123–43Google Scholar; for 1969: AJA lxxiv (1970) 149–55. No information is yet available on the 1970 season.Google Scholar
122 For arguments in favour of the identification see AJA lxxiv, 154-5.
123 Knidos, die Münzen des 6. und 5. Jhdts. (1970).
124 Bonner Jahrbücher 169 (1969) 88–103Google Scholar; cf. Robert, L., Hellenica vii (1949) 171–88.Google Scholar
125 International Herald Tribune, November 9, 1970; cf. The Times, November 10, 1970.
126 Opuscula Athen. viii (1968) 149–66.Google Scholar
127 Ibid. ix (1969) 59-93.
128 Akşit, Oktay, Likya Tarihi (Istanbul 1969).Google Scholar
129 For published interim reports by Metzger see Rev. arch. 1966, 1, 101-12, and 1970, 2, 307-22.
130 Rev. arch. 1966, 1, 108, with a dossier of supporting documents.Google Scholar
131 Rev. arch. 1970, 2, 321.Google Scholar
132 Rev. arch. 1969, 2, 225–32.Google Scholar
133 AA 1968, 174–238. Borchhardt tells us that inspection of Scharf and Hawkins' drawings in the British Museum has now led him to modify his reconstruction of the Sales monument.Google Scholar
134 A volume on these remains, inscriptions, and the necropolis is in preparation. On the xñtabura grave monument see now Ist. Mitt. xix–xx (1969-1970) 187 ff.Google Scholar
135 AA 1970, 353–90.Google Scholar
136 Brief reports on these activities in Dergi xv 1 (1966) 13–34; xvi 2 (1967) 161-72; xviii 1 (1969) 85-97.Google Scholar
137 AJA lxxiv (1970) 51–62.Google Scholar
138 Anz. Akad. Wien 1967, 31 f.Google Scholar
139 See our report of 1965, and more recently Bean, and Harrison, , JRS lvii (1967) 40–44.Google Scholar
140 Anz. Akad. Wien. 1968, 157–63.Google Scholar
141 Ergänzungsband zu TAM no. 4 (1971).Google Scholar
142 No. 102. Their previous researches of 1961-63 were published in Anat. Stud. xii (1962) 185–217Google Scholar and Denkschrift no. 85 (1965)Google Scholar. Another identification of Bean's which merits attention is that of Pisidian Etenna—a city much sought after by armchair topographers which should not have been so long mislaid since it could put 8,000 men in the field in 218 B.C. (Klio lii (1970) 13–16).Google Scholar
143 AJA lxxiv (1970) 253–9.Google Scholar
144 Anadolu Araştirmalan (Jahrbuch für kleinas. Forschung) ii (1965) 317–25.Google Scholar
145 Published as Le Rayonnement des civilisations grecque et romaine sur les cultures périphériques (1965) pp. 467–504.Google Scholar
146 He has developed this theme further in an article in Anatolica ii (1968) 87–102.Google Scholar
147 Another fine ‘Anatolian Greek’ belt handle has been published (Barnett, R. D., BMQ xxvii pl. 31gGoogle Scholar; Boardman, J., Anat. Stud. xvi (1966) 193 f.). One is also reported in a Phrygian tomb group at Dinar (Kelainai).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
148 Rev. arch. 1967, 2, 344–61.Google Scholar
149 Dolunay, and Dupont-Sommer, , Istanbul Ark. Müz Yilligi xiii–xiv (1966) 97–117Google Scholar; Akurgal, , Iranica antiqua vi (1966) 147–56.Google Scholar
150 Rev. arch. 1969, 1, 17–28, where full references are given.Google Scholar
151 Rev. arch. 1969, 2, 195–224.Google Scholar
152 See the preceding section. For a discussion of the reception in Lycia of the Ionic artistic koine, and later of Attic-Peloponnesian classicism. see Demargne, P. in Le Rayonnement 500–2.Google Scholar
153 Ist. Mitt. xviii (1968) 161–211.Google Scholar
154 Medelhavsmuseet Bulletin iv (1964) 49–53.Google Scholar
155 Greifenhagen, A., AA 1966, 44–7.Google Scholar
156 Bulletin Ant. Beschaving xl (1965) 1–25, xli (1966) 105-26.Google Scholar
156a See now Haspels, C. H. E., The Highlands of Phrygia (1971).Google Scholar
157 Dergi xviii I (1969) 109–16.Google Scholar
158 An article reported, Journal des Savants 1962, 79 ff., apparently with an announcement of a forthcoming work with photographs.Google Scholar
159 Ist. Mitt. xviii (1968) 221–37.Google Scholar
160 Dergi xvii 1 (1968) 5–37.Google Scholar
161 Tugrul, Lütfi and Firath, Nezih, Istanbul Ark. Müz. Yilliği xiii–xiv (1966) 230–41.Google Scholar
162 Preliminary reportion on 1965 season: AJA lxx (1966) 267–78Google Scholar; 1967 season: AJA lxxii (1968) 231–41; the report on 1969 season has not yet appeared.Google Scholar
163 Hesperia xxxviii (1969) 252–96Google Scholar; cf. Lejeune, M., Kadmos ix 1 (1970) 51–74.Google Scholar
164 Archaeology xxii 4 (October 1969) 270–5.Google Scholar
165 Expedition vii 3 (Spring 1965) 4–13.Google Scholar
166 AA 1967, 142–50.Google Scholar
167 Professor Lambrechts is reporting on each season's results in Dutch in De Brug (Ghent). He has also published marble figurines and reliefs of Cybele in the Eskişehir museum, Hommages à Marie Delcourt (Coll. Latomus 114, 1970) 211–18.