Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:35:14.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The roles of morphology, phonology, and prosody in reading and spelling multisyllabic words

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

Jodie L. Enderby ,
Julia M. Carroll Open the ORCID record for Julia M. Carroll [Opens in a new window] ,
M. Luisa Tarczynski-Bowles  and
Helen L. Breadmore
Jodie L. Enderby
Affiliation:
Centre for Global Learning, Education and Attainment, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
Julia M. Carroll*
Affiliation:
Centre for Global Learning, Education and Attainment, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
M. Luisa Tarczynski-Bowles
Affiliation:
Centre for Global Learning, Education and Attainment, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
Helen L. Breadmore
Affiliation:
Centre for Global Learning, Education and Attainment, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While most English words are multisyllabic, research on literacy acquisition has tended to focus on early acquisition of monosyllabic words. The processes involved in multisyllabic word reading and spelling in middle childhood are likely to differ from those in monosyllabic reading and spelling. The current paper examines the contributions of morphological awareness (MA; awareness of derivational morphemes), prosodic sensitivity (sensitivity to lexical stress), and phonological awareness (PA; awareness of phonemes) for multisyllabic word reading and spelling, after accounting for background variables (age, vocabulary, nonverbal IQ, short-term memory). Seventy 7–10-year-old children completed a battery of tasks. MA and prosodic sensitivity were independent predictors of multisyllabic reading, while MA and PA were independent predictors of multisyllabic spelling. These results contrast with previous research, which instead found that PA plays a more prominent role while prosodic sensitivity appears to demonstrate only an indirect influence. However, those studies largely examined reading of shorter, one to three syllable words. These findings indicate when words are longer and multisyllabic, prosodic sensitivity, PA, and MA have differing direct influences on literacy. MA and prosodic sensitivity relate to word reading, while MA and PA are important for spelling.

Keywords

multisyllabic wordsspellingprosodic sensitivityphonological awarenessmorphological awareness
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , July 2021 , pp. 865 - 885
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank all the children, parents and teachers involved in the research.

This work was completed as part of the first author’s Masters by Research dissertation.

References

Apel, K., Wilson-Fowler, E. B., Brimo, D., & Perrin, N. A. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1283–1305. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9317-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database. (Vol. Linguistic Data Consortium). University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1968). Aspects of language. Brace & World, Inc.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read—A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421. doi: 10.1038/301419a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breadmore, H. L., & Deacon, S. H. (2018). Morphological processing before and during children’s spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(2), 178–191. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2018.1499745 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breadmore, H. L., Deacon, S. H., & Chen, X. (2021). Awareness of inflectional and derivational morphology and reading comprehension (in preparation).Google Scholar
Breadmore, H. L., Vardy, E. J., Cunningham, A. J., Kwok, R. K. W. & Carroll, J. M. (2019). Literacy Development: Evidence Review. Education Endowment Foundation. The report is available from: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Literacy_Development_Evidence_Review.pdf Google Scholar
Calet, N., Gutiérrez-Palma, N., Simpson, I. C., González-Trujillo, C., & Defior, C. (2015). Suprasegmental phonology development and reading acquisition: A longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 51–71. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2014.976342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 428–449. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chall, J. (1983). Stages of reading development. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Chan, J. S., & Wade-Woolley, L (2018). Explaining phonology and reading in adult learners: Introducing prosodic awareness and executive functions to reading ability. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(1), 42–57. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clin, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Heggie, L. (2009). Prosodic sensitivity and morphological awareness in children’s reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(2), 197–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.05.005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, S. H. (2008). The metric matters: Determining the extent of children’s knowledge of morphological spelling regularities. Developmental Science, 11(3), 396–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00684.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, S. H., Benere, J., & Paquarella, A. (2013). Reciprocal relationship: children’s morphological awareness and their reading accuracy across grades 2 to 3. Developmental psychology, 49(6), 1113–1126. doi: 10.1037/a0029474 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2006a). Getting to the root: young writers’ sensitivity to the role of root morphemes in the spelling of inflected and derived words. Journal of Child Language, 33, 401–417. doi: 10.1017/S0305000906007409 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2006b). This turnip’s not for turning: Children’s morphological awareness and their use of root morphemes in spelling. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 567–575. doi: 10.1348/026151005X50834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Holliman, A., Dobson, G., & Harrison, E. (2018). Assessing direct contributions of morphological awareness and prosodic sensitivity to children’s word reading and reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(6), 527–534. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2018.1483376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “More phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238.doi: 10.1017.S0124716404001117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Education. (2014). National curriculum in England for Spelling. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/425601/PRIMARY_national_curriculum.pdf Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential to learning to read words in English. In Metsala, J. L. and Ehri, L. C. (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3–40). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Elbro, C., Borstrøm, I., & Petersen, D. K. (1998). Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: The importance of distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(1), 36–60. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.33.1.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, C. D., Smith, P., & McUlloch, K. (1996). British ability scales II. NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In Patterson, K., Marshall, J., and Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neurological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Foorman, B. R., Petscher, Y., & Bishop, M. D. (2012). The incremental variance of morphological knowledge to reading comprehension in grades 3–10 beyond prior reading comprehension, spelling, and text reading efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 792–798. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forum for Research in Literacy and Language. (2012). Diagnostic test of reading processes [measurement instrument]. GL Assessment.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. K., Goodwin, A. P., Compton, D. L., & Kearns, D. M. (2014). Multisyllabic word reading as a moderator of morphological awareness and reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1177/0022219413509966 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(54), 1–13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, E., Wood, C., Holliman, A., & Vousden, J. (2017). The immediate and longer-term effectiveness of a speech-rhythm-based reading intervention for beginning readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 1–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12126 Google Scholar
Hatcher, P. J., Duff, F. J., & Hulme, C. (2014). Sound linkage: An integrated programme for overcoming reading difficulties (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heggie, L., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2017). Reading longer words: Insights into multisyllabic word reading. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 2(1), 86–94. doi: 10.1044/persp2.SIG1.86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggie, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Briand, P. (2010). Suprasegmental phonological awareness and multisyllabic word reading. Paper presented at the Society for the Scientific Studies of Reading.Google Scholar
Hogan, T.P., Catts, H.W., & Little, T. D. (2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading: Implications for the assessment of phonological awareness. Speech, Language and Hearing Services in the Schools, 36(4), 285–293. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2005/029) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holliman, A., Critten, S., Lawrence, T., Harrison, E., Wood, C., & Hughes, D.J. (2014). Modeling the relationship between prosodic sensitivity and early literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 469–482. doi: 10.1002/rrq.82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliman, A., Gutiérrez Palma, N., Critten, S., Wood, C., Cunnane, H., & Pillinger, C. (2017a). Examining the independent contribution of prosodic sensitivity to word reading and spelling in early readers. Reading and Writing, 30(3), 509–521. doi: 10.1007/s11145-016-9687-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliman, A., Mundy, I. R., Wade-Woolley, L., Wood, C., & Bird, C. (2017b). Prosodic awareness and children’s multisyllabic word reading. Educational Psychology, 37, 1222–1241. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2017.1330948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliman, A., Williams, G. J., Mundy, I., Wood, C., Hart, L., & Waldron, S. (2014). Beginning to disentangle the prosody-literacy relationship: A multi-component measure of prosodic sensitivity. Reading and Writing, 27(2), 255–266. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9443-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliman, A., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2010a). The contribution of sensitivity of speech rhythm and non-speech rhythm to early reading development. Educational Psychology, 30(3), 247–267. doi: 10.1080/01443410903560922 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliman, A., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2010b). Does speech rhythm sensitivity predict children’s reading ability one year later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2) 356–366. doi: 10.1037/a0018049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, C., Hatcher, P. J., Nation, K., Brown, A., Adams, J., & Stuart, G. (2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 2–28. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2002.2670 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarmulowicz, L., Taran, V. L., & Hay, S. E. (2007). Third graders’ metalinguistic skills, reading skills, and stress production in derived English words. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; 50(6), 1593–1605. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.-S. G., & Petscher, Y. (2016). Prosodic sensitivity and reading: An investigation of pathways of relations using a latent variable approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 630–645. doi: 10.1037/edu0000078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 389–410. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J.R., Parrila, R., & Pfeiffer, S. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 453–464. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levesque, K. C., Breadmore, H. L., & Deacon, H. S. (2021). How morphology impacts reading and spelling: advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 10–26. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing, 12(3), 191–218. doi: 10.1023/A:1008136012492 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCutchen, D., Green, L., & Abbott, R. D. (2008). Children’s morphological knowledge: Links to literacy. Reading Psychology, 29(4), 289–314. doi: 10.1080/02702710801982050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, S. (1998). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 3–27. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. doi: 10.1080/10888430701530730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In Precursors of functional literacy. (pp. 189–213). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 507–537. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade-Woolley, L., & Wood, C. (2006). Prosodic sensitivity and reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 253–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00306.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade-Woolley, L. (2016). Prosodic and phonemic awareness in children’s reading of long and short words. Reading and Writing 29(3). doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9600-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 73–87. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. PRO-ED.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. 2nd ed. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Whalley, K., & Hansen, J. (2006). The role of prosodic sensitivity in children’s reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(3), 288–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00309.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, C., Wade-Woolley, L., & Holliman, A. (2009). Phonological awareness: Beyond phonemes. In Contemporary perspectives on reading and spelling. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin 131(1), 3–29. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed