Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:00:18.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comprehension of complex sentences with misleading cues in monolingual and bilingual children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2021

Sarvenaz Ostadghafour  and
Ellen Bialystok Open the ORCID record for Ellen Bialystok [Opens in a new window]
Sarvenaz Ostadghafour
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, York University, M3J 1P3Toronto, ON, Canada
Ellen Bialystok*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, York University, M3J 1P3Toronto, ON, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bilingual children typically perform more poorly than monolingual children on linguistic tasks but better than monolingual children on cognitive tasks requiring executive function. The present study examined performance on complex linguistic tasks that also required executive functioning for their solution. One hundred 4-year-olds from linguistically diverse backgrounds (36 monolinguals, 64 bilinguals) performed two linguistic tasks in which misleading information needed to be ignored to select the correct answer. Data were analyzed both categorically by comparing the performance of children assigned to monolingual and bilingual groups and continuously in terms of degree of bilingual experience across the entire sample. In the categorical analyses, bilingual children were more accurate than monolingual children in understanding the meaning of spoken sentences in the presence of distraction in both tasks, and continuous analyses showed that performance was calibrated to degree of bilingualism in one of the tasks, with higher levels of bilingualism being associated with better performance. The interpretation is that attentional control built up through bilingual experience compensates for lower levels of language proficiency in performing these complex linguistic tasks. The study also endorses the use of continuous assessments of bilingualism rather than categorical assignment to groups to obtain more nuanced results.

Keywords

bilingualismexecutive functionattentional ControlSentence comprehensionVocabulary
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , September 2021 , pp. 1117 - 1134
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adesope, O. O., Lavin, T., Thompson, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2010). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Review of Educational Research, 80, 207–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. A. E., Mak, L., Keyvani Chahi, A., & Bialystok, E. (2018). The language and social background questionnaire: Assessing degree of bilingualism in a diverse population. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 250–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. A. E., Hawrylewicz, K., & Bialystok, E. (2018). Who is bilingual? Snapshots across the lifespan. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.Google Scholar
Bak, T. H. (2016). Cooking pasta in La Paz. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6, 699–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barac, R., Bialystok, E., Castro, D. C., & Sanchez, M. (2014). The cognitive development of young dual language learners: a critical review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29, 699–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, J. M. J., Chambers, C. G., & Graham, S. A. (2010). Preschoolers’ appreciation of speaker vocal affect as a cue to referential intent. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(2), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2015). Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 117–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E. (2016). The signal and the noise. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(5), 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2017). The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 233–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Barac, R., Blaye, A., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2010). Word mapping and executive functioning in young monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 485–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K. F., & Yang, S. (2010). Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(4), 525–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., & Senman, L. (2004). Executive processes in appearance-reality tasks: The role of inhibition of attention and symbolic representation. Child Development, 75(2), 562–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blom, E., Boerma, T., Bosma, E., Cornips, L., & Everaert, E. (2017). Cognitive advantages of bilingual children in different sociolinguistic contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blom, E., Küntay, A. C., Messer, M., Verhagen, J., & Leseman, P. (2014). The benefits of being bilingual: Working memory in bilingual Turkish–Dutch children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 128, 105–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvo, A., & Bialystok, E. (2014). Independent effects of bilingualism and socioeconomic status on language ability and executive functioning. Cognition, 130(3), 278–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, S. M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2008). Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11 (2), 282–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Groot, A. M. B., Kaplan, J., Rosenblatt, E., Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Understanding versus discriminating nonliteral utterances: Evidence for dissociation. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesendruck, G., Hall, D. G., & Graham, S. A. (2006). Children’s use of syntactic and pragmatic knowledge in the interpretation of novel adjectives. Child Development, 77, 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, S., Brooks, P. J., & Homer, B. D. (2019). Is there a bilingual advantage on interference-control tasks? A multiverse meta-analysis of global reaction time and interference cost. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1122–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunabeitia, J. A., Hernandez, J. A., Anton, E., Macizo, P., Estevez, A., Fuentes, L. J., & Carreiras, M. (2014). The inhibitory advantage in bilingual children revisited: myth or reality? Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 234–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test, 4th ed. NCS Pearson Inc.Google Scholar
Filippi, R., Morris, J., Richardson, F. M., Bright, P., Thomas, M. S. C., Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Marian, V. (2015). Bilingual children show an advantage in controlling verbal interference during spoken language comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 490–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: The role of load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(1), 73–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Freire, A., Eskritt, M., & Lee, K. (2002). Are eyes windows to a deceiver’s soul? Children’s use of another’s eye gaze cues in a deceptive situation. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1093–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fussell, S., & Moss, L. (eds.) (1998). Figurative language in emotional communication. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C., Thomas, E. M., Kennedy, I., Prys, C., Young, N., Vinas Guasch, N., Jones, L. (2014). Does language dominance affect cognitive performance in bilinguals? Lifespan evidence from preschoolers through older adults on card sorting, Simon, and metalinguistic tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldie, P. (2002). Emotions, feelings and intentionality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartanto, A., Toh, W. X., & Yang, H. (2019). Bilingualism narrows socioeconomic disparities in executive functions and self-regulatory behaviors during early childhood: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Child Development, 90, 1215–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilchey, M. D., & Klein, R. M. (2011). Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 625–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalashnikova, M., & Mattock, K. (2014). Maturation of executive functioning skills in early sequential bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(1), 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormi-Nouri, R., Moradi, A., Moradi, S., Akbari-Zardkhaneh, S., & Zahedian, H. (2012). The effect of bilingualism on letter and category fluency tasks in primary school children: Advantage or disadvantage? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(2), 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. J. (2000). The production and processing of verbal irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krizman, J., Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2016). Bilingual enhancements have no socioeconomic boundaries. Developmental Science, 19(6), 881–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bogulski, C. A., & Valdes-Kroff, J. R. (2012). Juggling two languages in one mind: what bilinguals tell us about language processing and its consequences for cognition. In Ross, B. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 56, pp. 229–262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Luk, G., Green, D. W., Abutalebi, J., & Grady, C. (2012). Cognitive control for language switching in bilinguals: A quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1479–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, T., Robertson, I. H., Anderson, V., and Nimmo-Smith, I. (1999). TEA-Ch: The test of everyday attention for children manual. Thames Valley Test Company Limited.Google Scholar
Martin-Rhee, M. M., & Bialystok, E. (2008). The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, J. B., & Harper, S. N. (2007). What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science, 10, 719–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, J. B., & Trehub, S. E. (2001). Children’s understanding of emotion in speech. Child Development, 72(3), 834–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J. B., Trehub, S. E., & Zelazo, P. D. (2003). Sources of inflexibility in 6-year-olds’ understanding of emotion in speech. Child Development, 74, 1857–1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurmsoo, E., & Bloom, P. (2008). Preschoolers’ perspective- taking in word learning: Do they blindly follow eye gaze? Psychological Science, 19, 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okanda, M., Moriguchi, Y., & Itakura, S. (2010). Language and cognitive shifting: evidence from young monolingual and bilingual children. Psychological Science, 107(1), 68–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Ooi, S. H., Goh, W. D., Sorace, A., & Bak, T. H. (2018). From bilingualism to bilingualisms: Bilingual experience in Edinburgh and Singapore affects attentional control differently. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(4), 867–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A. (1975). Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory, 25, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. In Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 33–60). Wiley.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science, 5, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockwell, P. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2016d). 2016 Census of mother tongue for the residents of Canadian metropolitan areas. Retrieved from https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/hlt-fst/lang/Table.cfm?Lang=E&T=12&Geo=00&SP=6 Google Scholar
Surrain, S., & Luk, G. (2019). Describing bilinguals: A systematic review of labels and descriptions used in the literature between 2005–2015. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas-Sunesson, D., Hakuta, K., & Bialystok, E. (2018). Degree of bilingualism modifies executive control in Hispanic children in the USA. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(2), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timmer, K., Ganushchak, L. Y., Ceusters, I., & Schiller, N. O. (2014). Second language phonology influences first language word naming. Brain and Language, 133, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaish, A., Grossmann, T., & Woodward, A. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 383–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waxer, M., & Morton, J. B. (2011). Children’s judgments of emotion from conflicting cues in speech: Why 6-year-olds are so inflexible. Child Development, 82, 1648–1660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2012). Unconscious translation during incidental foreign language processing. NeuroImage, 59, 3468–3473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, S., Yang, H., & Lust, B. (2011). Early childhood bilingualism leads to advances in executive attention: Dissociating culture and language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 412–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S., & Yang, H. (2016). Bilingual effects on deployment of the attention system in linguistically and culturally homogeneous children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 146, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshida, H., Tran, D. N., Benitez, V., & Kuwabara, M. (2011). Inhibition and adjective learning in bilingual and monolingual children. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M. (2011). Bilingualism and children’s use of paralinguistic cues to interpret emotion in speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(4), 562–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M. (2015). A bilingual advantage in how children integrate multiple cues to understand a speaker’s referential intent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(03), 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., Frye, D., & Rapus, T. (1996). An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them. Cognitive Development, 11, 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar