Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:48:20.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantifying the propagule load associated with the construction of an Antarctic research station

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2009

Jennifer E. Lee*
Affiliation:
Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
Steven L. Chown
Affiliation:
Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa

Abstract

Although the impacts of biological invasions are widely appreciated, a bias exists in research effort to post dispersal processes because of the difficulties of measuring propagule pressure. Here we quantify the propagule pressure associated with the construction of a research station in Antarctica. Based on quantitative assessment of different classes of cargo, we predict that over 5000 seeds will be entrained during the period of building the station. Seeds from 34 taxa were identified, including known invasive species.

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergstrom, D.M.Smith, V.R. 1990. Alien vascular flora of Marion and Prince Edwards Islands: new species, present distribution and status. Antarctic Science, 2, 301308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chown, S.L.Convey, P. 2007. Spatial and temporal variability across life’s hierarchies in the terrestrial Antarctic. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B362, 23072331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chown, S.L., Gremmen, N.J.M.Gaston, K.J. 1998. Ecological biogeography of Southern Ocean islands: species-area relationships, human impacts, and conservation. American Naturalist, 152, 562575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chwedorzewska, K.J. 2008. Poa annua L. in Antarctic: searching for the source of introduction. Polar Biology, 31, 263268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenot, Y., Gloaguen, J.C., Masse, L.Lebouvier, M. 2001. Human activities, ecosystem disturbance and plant invasions in subantarctic Crozet, Kerguelen and Amsterdam islands. Biological Conservation, 101, 3350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenot, Y., Chown, S.L., Whinam, J., Selkirk, P.M., Convey, P., Skotnicki, M.Bergstrom, D.M. 2005. Biological invasions in the Antarctic: extent, impacts and implications. Biology Reviews, 80, 4572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaston, K.J., Jones, A.J., Hänel, C.Chown, S.L. 2003. Rates of species introduction to a remote oceanic island. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B270, 10911098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotelli, N.J.Colwell, R.K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters, 4, 379391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, K.A. 2003. Aerial dispersal and survival of sewage-derived faecal coliforms in Antarctica. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 31473155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A.G., Chown, S.L.Gaston, K.J. 2003. Introduced house mice as a conservation concern on Gough Island. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 21072119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamers, M., Haase, D.Amelung, B. 2008. Facing the elements: analysing trends in Antarctic tourism. Tourism Review, 63, 1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.E.Chown, S.L. 2007. Mytilus on the move: transport of an invasive bivalve to the Antarctic. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 339, 307310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.E.Chown, S.L. In press. Breaching the dispersal barrier to invasion: quantification and management. Ecological Applications.Google Scholar
Lewis, P.N., Hewitt, C.L., Riddle, M.McMinn, A. 2003. Marine introductions in the Southern Ocean: an unrecognised hazard to biodiversity. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 46, 213223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, J.L., Cassey, P.Blackburn, T.M. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 223228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansfield, B.Gilbert, N. 2008. Availability and applicability of legal tools for managing non-native species. In Rogan-Finnemore M.,ed. Non-native species in the Antarctic: proceedings. Christchurch: Gateway Antarctica Special Publication, 131164.Google Scholar
Naveen, R., Forrest, S.C., Dagit, R.G., Blight, L.K., Trivelpiece, W.Z.Trivelpiece, S.G. 2001. Zodiac landings by tourist ships in the Antarctic Peninsula region, 1989–99. Polar Record, 37, 121132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puth, L.M.Post, D.M. 2005. Studying invasion: have we missed the boat? Ecology Letters, 8, 715721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D.M.Pyšek, P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progress in Physical Geography, 30, 409431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimono, Y.Konuma, A. 2008. Effects of human-mediated processes on weed species composition in internationally traded grain commodities. Weed Research, 48, 1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabber, S.Chown, S.L. 2002. The first record of a terrestrial crustacean, Porcellio scaber (Isopoda, Porcellionidae), from sub-Antarctic Marion Island. Polar Biology, 25, 855858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.I.L. 1996. Introduced plants in Antarctica: potential impacts and conservation issues. Biological Conservation, 76, 135146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J., Overland, J.E.Walsh, J.E. 2007. An Arctic and Antarctic perspective on recent climate change. International Journal of Climatology, 27, 277293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whinam, J., Chilcott, N.Bergstrom, D.M. 2005. Subantarctic hitchhikers: expeditioners as vectors for the introduction of alien organisms. Biological Conservation, 121, 207219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar