Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:53:45.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatial patterns of total petroleum hydrocarbons in the terrestrial environment at McMurdo Station, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2012

Andrew G. Klein*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, MS 3147, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3147, USA
Stephen T. Sweet
Affiliation:
Geochemical and Environmental Research Group, MS 3149, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-3149, USA
Terry L. Wade
Affiliation:
Geochemical and Environmental Research Group, MS 3149, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-3149, USA
José L. Sericano
Affiliation:
Geochemical and Environmental Research Group, MS 3149, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-3149, USA
Mahlon C. Kennicutt
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, MS 3148, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-3148, USA

Abstract

Fossil fuels are used throughout the United States Antarctic Program. Accidental releases of petroleum hydrocarbons are the leading source of environmental contamination. Since 1999 McMurdo Station has been the site of the most extensive environmental monitoring programme in Antarctica. Nearly 2500 surface soil samples were collected from 1999–2007 to determine the spatial “footprint” of petroleum hydrocarbons. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) concentrations were measured using a high-resolution capillary gas chromatographic method with flame ionization detection. Three distinct TPH patterns were detected: low molecular weight gasoline/JP5/AN8, residual weathered petroleum and an unresolved complex mixture of high molecular weight material. Overall TPH concentrations were low with 38% of the samples having TPH concentrations below 30 ppm and 58% below 100 ppm. Total petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations above 30 ppm are largely confined to the central portions of the station, along roads and in other areas where elevated TPH would be expected. Peripheral areas typically have TPH concentrations below 15 ppm. Areas of elevated TPH concentrations are patchy and of limited spatial extent, seldom extending over distances of 100 m. This environmental monitoring programme is ongoing and can serve as an example to other Antarctic programmes concerned with monitoring environmental impacts.

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adlam, L., Balks, M., Seybold, C.Campbell, D. 2010. Temporal and spatial variation in active layer depth in the McMurdo Sound region, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 22, 4552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aislabie, J., McLeod, M.Fraser, R. 1998. Potential for biodegradation of hydrocarbons in soil from the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 49, 210214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aislabie, J.M., Balks, M.R., Foght, J.M.Waterhouse, E.J. 2004. Hydrocarbon spills on Antarctic soils: effects and management. Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 12651274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anselin, L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association - LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27, 93115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balks, M.R., Paetzold, R.F., Kimble, J.M., Aislabie, J.Campbell, I.B. 2002. Effects of hydrocarbon spills on the temperature and moisture regimes of cryosols in the Ross Sea region. Antarctic Science, 14, 319326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargagli, R. 2005. Antarctic ecosystems : environmental contamination, climate change, and human impact. Berlin: Springer, 395 pp.Google Scholar
Bargagli, R. 2008. Environmental contamination in Antarctic ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 400, 212226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bej, A.K., Saul, D.Aislabie, J. 2000. Cold-tolerant alkane-degrading Rhodococcus species from Antarctica. Polar Biology, 23, 100105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, E., Chang, S.-C.Brown, A.J. 1997. Pollution abatement at McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Proceedings of the Seventh (1997) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, USA, May 25–30 1997. Golden, CO:The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 572–578.Google Scholar
Coulon, F.Delille, D. 2006. Influence of substratum on the degradation processes in diesel polluted sub-Antarctic soils (Crozet Archipelago). Polar Biology, 29, 806812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cressie, N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for spatial data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 900 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockett, A.B. 1998. Background levels of metals in soils, McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 50, 289296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delille, D.Pelletier, E. 2002. Natural attenuation of diesel-oil contamination in a sub-Antarctic soil (Iles Crozet). Polar Biology, 25, 682687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deprez, P.P., Arens, M.Locher, H. 1999. Identification and assessment of contaminated sites at Casey Station, Wilkes Land, Antarctica. Polar Record, 35, 299316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, T. 2007. Advancements in gas turbine fuels from 1943 to 2005. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 129, 1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getis, A.Ord, J.K. 1992. The analysis of spatial association by the use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24, 189206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, P.M., Canning, E.A.Riddle, M.J. 2003. Soil and water contamination in the Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica. Polar Record, 39, 319337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goovaerts, P. 1999. Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma, 89, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, D.B., Revill, A.T.Guille, D. 1999. Petroleum hydrocarbons ten years after spillage at a helipad in Bunger Hills, East Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 11, 427429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G.Nichols, P.D. 1995. Hydrocarbons and sterols in marine sediments and soils at Davis Station, Antarctica: a survey for human-derived contaminants. Antarctic Science, 7, 137144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, K.A. 2010. How committed are we to monitoring human impacts in Antarctica? Environmental Research Letters , 10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/041001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt II, M.C., McDonald, T.J., Denoux, G.J.McDonald, S.J. 1992. Hydrocarbon contamination on the Antarctic Peninsula. I. Arthur Harbor - subtidal sediments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 24, 499506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt II, M.C., Sayers, J.C.A., Walton, D.W.H.Wratt, G. 1996. Monitoring of environmental impacts from science and operations in Antarctica. A Report for The Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) and The Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs (COMNAP), x + 124 pp.Google Scholar
Kennicutt II, M.C., Klein, A., Montagna, P., Sweet, S., Wade, T., Palmer, T., Sericano, J.Denoux, G. 2010. Temporal and spatial patterns of anthropogenic disturbance at McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Environmental Research Letters , 10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, A., Kennicutt II, M.C., Wolff, G., Sweet, S., Bloxom, T., Gielstra, D.Cleckley, M. 2008. The historical development of McMurdo station, Antarctica, an environmental perspective. Polar Geography, 31, 119144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Science Foundation. 2004. United States Antarctic Program Master Permit Application, Permit Number 2005 WM-001. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 123 pp.Google Scholar
Revill, A.T., Snape, I., Lucieer, A.Guille, D. 2007. Constraints on transport and weathering of petroleum contamination at Casey Station, Antarctica. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 48, 154167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snape, I., Ferguson, S.H., Harvey, P.M.Riddle, M.J. 2006. Investigation of evaporation and biodegradation of fuel spills in Antarctica: II - Extent of natural attenuation at Casey Station. Chemosphere, 63, 8998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, S.C., Gardner, D., Snape, I.McIvor, E. 2003. Assessment of contamination by heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons at Atlas Cove Station, Heard Island. Polar Record, 39, 397414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, O.S.Vidas, D., eds. 1997 Governing the Antarctic: the effectiveness and legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 486 pp.Google Scholar
Stout, J.A., Leather, J.M.Corl, W.E.I. 2003. A user's guide for determining the sources of contaminants in sediments. A demonstration study: sources of PSH in sediments in the vicinity of Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Elizabeth River, Norfolk, Virginia. US Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Technical Report 1907. San Diego, CA: Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, 97 pp.Google Scholar
Tin, T., Fleming, Z.L., Hughes, K.A., Ainley, D.G., Convey, P., Moreno, C.A., Pfeiffer, S., Scott, J.Snape, I. 2009. Impacts of local human activities on the Antarctic environment. Antarctic Science, 21, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, T.L., Atlas, E.L., Brooks, J.M., Kennicutt II, M.C., Fox, R.G., Sericano, J., Garcia-Romero, B.DeFreitas, D. 1988. NOAA Gulf of Mexico status and trends program: trace organic contaminant distribution in sediments and oysters. Estuaries, 11, 171179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, A. 1992. International law and the Antarctic Treaty System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 483 pp.Google Scholar
Webster, J., Webster, K., Nelson, P.Waterhouse, E. 2003. The behaviour of residual contaminants at a former station site, Antarctica. Environmental Pollution, 123, 163179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, D.W.S.Lee, J. 2005. Statistical analysis of geographic information with ArcView GIS and ArcGIS. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 441 pp.Google Scholar
Zhang, C.Selinus, O. 1998. Statistics and GIS in environmental geochemistry - some problems and solutions. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 64, 339354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar