Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:52:26.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The moss Bryum argenteum var. muticum Brid. is well adapted to cope with high light in continental Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2012

B. Schroeter ,
T.G.A. Green ,
Daniel Kulle ,
S. Pannewitz ,
M. Schlensog  and
L.G. Sancho
B. Schroeter*
Affiliation:
Botanical Institute, University of Kiel, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
T.G.A. Green
Affiliation:
Biological Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand Dept Biologia Vegetal II, Fac. de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
Daniel Kulle
Affiliation:
Botanical Institute, University of Kiel, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
S. Pannewitz
Affiliation:
Botanical Institute, University of Kiel, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
M. Schlensog
Affiliation:
Botanical Institute, University of Kiel, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
L.G. Sancho
Affiliation:
Dept Biologia Vegetal II, Fac. de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The net photosynthetic rate (NP), chlorophyll fluorescence, carotenoid content and chlorophyll content of the cosmopolitan moss Bryum argenteum were measured in the field at Botany Bay, southern Victoria Land, continental Antarctica (77°S). Comparisons were made between sun- and shade-adapted forms, and changes were followed as the moss emerged from under the snow and during exposure of shade and sun forms to ambient light. Shade forms had lower light compensation and saturation values for NP but little difference in maximal NP rates. Shade forms exposed to ambient light changed rapidly (within five days) towards the performance of the sun forms. Surprisingly, this change was not by acclimation of shoots but by the production of new shoots. Chlorophyll and carotenoid levels measured on a molar chlorophyll basis showed no difference between sun and shade forms and also little change during emergence. The constant molar relationship between carotenoids and chlorophyll plus the high levels of the xanthophyll cycle pigments suggest that protection of the chlorophyll antenna was constitutive. This is an adaptation to the very high light levels that occur when the plants are active in continental Antarctica and contrasts to the situation in more temperate areas where high light is normally avoided by desiccation.

Keywords

acclimationcarotenoidschlorophyll fluorescenceglutathionephotosynthesisVAZ
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , 24 May 2012 , pp. 281 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams III, W.W., Zarter, C.R., Ebbert, V.Demmig-Adams, B. 2004. Photoprotective strategies of overwintering evergreens. BioScience, 54, 41–49.Google Scholar
Bilger, W.Björkman, O. 1990. Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis. Photosynthesis Research, 25, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Björkman, O. 1981. Responses to different quantum flux densities. In Lange, O.L., Aragno, M.&Nobel, P.S.,eds. Physiological plant ecology I. Berlin: Springer, 57–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, O.Demmig-Adams, B. 1995. Regulation of photosynthetic light energy capture, conversion, and dissipation in leaves of higher plants. In Schulze, E.D.&Caldwell, M.M.,eds. Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Berlin: Springer, 17–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demmig-Adams, B. 1998. Survey of thermal energy dissipation and pigment composition in sun and shade leaves. Plant and Cell Physiology, 39, 474–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demmig-Adams, B.Adams III, W.W. 1996. Xanthophyll cycle and light stress in nature: uniform response to excess direct sunlight among higher plant species. Planta, 198, 460–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demmig-Adams, B.Adams III, W.W. 2006. Photoprotection in an ecological context: the remarkable complexity of thermal energy dissipation. New Phytologist, 172, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J.L., Turnbull, D.Robinson, S.A. 2004. Comparison of solvent regimes for the extraction of photosynthetic pigments from leaves of higher plants. Functional Plant Biology, 31, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glime, J.M. (2007). Bryophyte ecology. Volume 1. Physiological ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. http://www.bryoecol.mtu.edu/, accessed 23 August 2011.Google Scholar
Green, T.G.A.Lange, O.L. 1995. Photosynthesis in poikilohydric plants: a comparison of lichen and bryophytes. In Schulze, E.D.&Caldwell, M.M.,eds. Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Berlin: Springer, 319–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T.G.A., Schroeter, B.Sancho, L.G. 2007. Plant life in Antarctica. In Pugnaire, F.I.&Valladares, F.,eds. Handbook of functional plant ecology. New York: Marcel Dekker, 389–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T.G.A., Schroeter, B.Seppelt, R.D. 2000. Effect of temperature, light and ambient UV on the photosynthesis of the moss Bryum argenteum Hedw. in continental Antarctica. In Davison, W., Howard-Williams, C.&Broady, P.,eds. Antarctic ecosystems: models of wider ecological understanding. Christchurch: Caxton Press, 165–170.Google Scholar
Green, T.G.A., Kulle, D., Pannewitz, S., Sancho, L.G.Schroeter, B. 2005. UV-A protection in mosses growing in continental Antarctica. Polar Biology, 28, 822–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, P., Ruban, A.V.Walters, R.G. 1996. Regulation of light harvesting in green plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 28, 655–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappen, L.Valladares, F. 2007. Oppotunistic growth and desiccation tolerance, the ecological success of the poikilohydrous strategy. In Pugnaire, F.I.&Valladares, F., eds. Functional plant ecology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 724 pp.Google Scholar
Kappen, L., Schroeter, B., Green, T.G.A.Seppelt, R.D. 1998. Microclimatic conditions, meltwater moistening, and the distributional pattern of Buellia frigida on rock in a southern continental Antarctic habitat. Polar Biology, 19, 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, G.H. 1994. Photoinhibition induced by low temperatures. In Baker, N.R.&Bowyer, J.R., eds. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis: from molecular mechanisms to the field. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers, 331–348.Google Scholar
Lovelock, C.E.Robinson, S.A. 2002. Surface reflectance properties of Antarctic moss and their relationship to plant species, pigment composition and photosynthetic function. Plant, Cell and Environment, 25, 1239–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelock, C.E., Osmond, C.B.Seppelt, R.D. 1995b. Photoinhibition in the Antarctic moss Grimmia antarctici Card. when exposed to cycles of freezing and thawing. Plant, Cell and Environment, 18, 1395–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelock, C.E., Jackson, A.E., Melick, D.R.Seppelt, R. 1995a. Reversible photoinhibition in Antarctic moss during freezing and thawing. Plant Physiology, 109, 955–961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lud, D., Schlensog, M., Schroeter, B.Huiskes, A.H.L. 2003. The influence of UV-B radiation on light dependent photosynthetic perfomance in Sanionia unicinata (Hedw.) Loeske in Antarctica. Polar Biology, 26, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lud, D., Moerdijik, T.C.W., van De Poll, W.H., Buma, A.G.J.Huiskes, A.H.L. 2002. DNA damage and photosynthesis in Antarctica and Arctic Sanionia uncinata (Hedw.) Loeske under ambient and enhanced levels of UV-B radiation. Plant, Cell and Environment, 25, 1579–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschall, M.Proctor, M.C.F. 2004. Are bryophytes shade plants? Photosynthetic light responses and proportions of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total carotenoids. Annals of Botany, 94, 593–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-Ferri, E., Balaguer, L., Valladares, F., Chico, J.M.Manrique, E. 2000. Energy dissipation in drought-avoiding and drought-tolerant tree species at midday during the Mediterranean summer. Tree Physiology, 20, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newsham, K.K., Hodgson, D.A., Murray, W.A., Peat, H.J.Smith, R.I.L. 2002. Response of two Antarctic bryophytes to stratospheric ozone depletion. Global Change Biology, 8, 972–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochyra, R., Lewis Smith, R.I.Bednarek-Ochyra, H. 2008. The illustrated moss flora of Antarctica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 704 pp.Google Scholar
Öquist, G., Greer, D.H.Ögren, E. 1987. Light stress at low temperature. In Kyle, D.J., Osmond, C.B.&Arntzen, C.J., eds. Photoinhibition. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 67–87.Google Scholar
Pannewitz, S., Green, T.G.A., Scheidegger, C., Schlensog, M.Schroeter, B. 2003. Activity pattern of the moss Hennediella heimii (Hedw.) Zand. in the Dry Valleys, southern Victoria Land, Antarctica, during the mid-austral summer. Polar Biology, 26, 545–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfündel, E.Bilger, W. 1994. Regulation and possible function of the violaxanthin cycle. Photosynthesis Research, 42, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pontailler, J.-Y. 1990. A cheap quantum sensor using a gallium arsenide photodiode. Functional Ecology, 4, 591–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porra, R.J. 1991. Recent advances and re-assessments in chlorophyll extraction and assay procedures of terrestrial, aquatic and marine organisms including recalcitrant algae. In Scheer, H.,ed. Chlorophylls. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1272 pp.Google Scholar
Post, A. 1990. Photoprotective pigment as an adaptive strategy in the Antarctic moss Ceratodon purpureus. Polar Biology, 10, 241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, M.C.F.Smirnoff, N. 2011. Ecophysiology of photosynthesis in bryophytes: major roles for oxygen photoreduction and non-photochemical quenching? Physiologia Plantarum, 141, 130–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, S.A., Turnbull, J.D.Lovelock, C.E. 2005. Impact of changes in natural ultraviolet radiation on pigment composition, physiological and morphological characteristics of the Antarctic moss, Grimmia antarctici. Global Change Biology, 11, 476–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sancho, L.G., Pintado, A., Green, T.G.A., Pannewitz, S.Schroeter, B. 2003. Photosynthetic and morphological variation within and among populations of the Antarctic lichen Umbilicaria aprina: implications of thallus size. Bibliotheca Lichenologica, 86, 299–311.Google Scholar
Schlensog, M.Schroeter, B. 2000. Poikilohydry in Antarctic cryptogams and its role for photosynthetic performance in mesic and xeric habitats. In Davison, W., Howard-Williams, C.&Broady, P., eds. Antarctic ecosystems: models of wider ecological understanding. Christchurch: Caxton Press, 175–182.Google Scholar
Schlensog, M., Schroeter, B., Pannewitz, S.Green, T.G.A. 2003. Adaptation of mosses and lichens to irradiance stress in maritime and continental Antarctic habitats. In Huiskes, A.H.L., Gieskes, W.W.C., Rozema, J., Schorno, R.M.L., van Der Vies, S.M.&Wolff, W.J.,eds. Antarctic biology in a global context. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers, 161–166.Google Scholar
Schreiber, U., Bilger, W.Neubauer, C. 1994. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a nonintrusive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo photosynthesis. In Schulze, E.D.&Caldwell, M.M.,eds. Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Berlin: Springer, 49–70.Google Scholar
Schroeter, B., Green, T.G.A., Kappen, L.Seppelt, R.D. 1994. Carbon dioxide exchange at subzero temperatures. Field measurements on Umbilicaria aprina in Antarctica. Cryptogamic Botany, 4, 233–241.Google Scholar
Schroeter, B., Green, T.G.A., Pannewitz, S., Schlensog, M.Sancho, L.G. 2010. Fourteen degrees of latitude and a continent apart: comparison of lichen activity over two years at continental and maritime Antarctic sites. Antarctic Science, 22, 681–690.Google Scholar
Schroeter, B., Green, T.G.A., Pannewitz, S., Schlensog, M.Sancho, L.G. 2011. Summer variability, winter dormancy: lichen activity over 3 years at Botany Bay, 77°S latitude, continental Antarctica. Polar Biology, 34, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seppelt, R.D., Tuerk, R., Green, T.G.A., Moser, G., Pannewitz, S., Sancho, L.G.Schroeter, B. 2010. Lichen and moss communities of Botany Bay, Granite Harbour, Ross Sea, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 22, 691–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, K.R.S., Convey, P.Newsham, K.K. 2007. Metabolic recovery of the Antarctic liverwort Cephaloziella varians during spring snowmelt. Polar Biology, 30, 1115–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar