Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:37:48.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

World CALL: Are We Connected?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2019

Mike Levy Open the ORCID record for Mike Levy [Opens in a new window]
Mike Levy*
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the last 20 years we have moved from a somewhat idealistic vision of the internet to one that is far more nuanced and complex. Disruption and change now surround us in a more uncertain and unpredictable world (Foer, 2017; Greenfield, 2017; Lanier, 2018; O'Neil, 2016). This article examines some of the key changes in the wider world and how they may relate to the use of new technologies in second language learning. This topic is approached from three perspectives that have thus far been relatively unexplored. First, the article looks at digital literacy, a cognate field that has long been motivated by issues and concerns relating to educational technology and the classroom–world connection. Second, it considers the role and use of authentic materials and texts. Third, it contrasts notions of input and output as these terms apply to humans and machines, and as they are used in research on second language learning.

The goal throughout is to highlight the benefits of increased connectivity between the wider world and the world of the language classroom. Through increased awareness and informed debate, it is hoped this will place us in a stronger position to understand and plan for the changes ahead.

Type
Position Paper
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 39 , March 2019 , pp. 59 - 73
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article originated with a keynote speech entitled “WorldCALL then and now: Engagement, adaptation and change” presented at the 5th WorldCALL Conference at the Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile, November 13–16, 2018.

References

Adams, D., & Lloyd, J. (1983). The meaning of Liff. London, UK: Pan Books & Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Aoun, J. (2017). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Banados-Santana, E. (2018). Combining theory, practice and technology in a CALL B-learning environment for EFL learners. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 7(2), 53–84.Google Scholar
Buendgens-Kosten, J. (2014). Authenticity. ELT Journal, 68(4), 457–459.Google Scholar
Caruana, A. (2018, 13 December). Today I discovered why searching Google for “idiot” shows Trump. Retrieved from https://www.lifehacker.com.au/2018/12/today-i-discovered-why-searching-for-idiot-finds-trump/Google Scholar
Ciornei, S. I., & Dina, T. A. (2015). Authentic texts in teaching English. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 180, 274–279.Google Scholar
Dehghan, S. K. (2018, 3 September). Louvre Abu Dhabi postpones display of Leonardo's Salvator Mundi. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/sep/03/louvre-abu-dhabi-postpones-display-of-worlds-most-expensive-painting-leonardo-da-vinciGoogle Scholar
Farr, F., & Murray, L. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foer, F. (2017). World without mind: The existential threat of Big Tech. London, UK: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, A., & Hawkey, R. (2011). Re-fitting for a different purpose: A case study of item writer practices in adapting source texts for a test of academic writing. Language Testing, 29(1), 109–129.Google Scholar
Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical technologies: The design of everyday life. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jones, R., & Richards, J. (2016). Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keen, A. (2015). The Internet is not the answer. London, UK: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Keen, A. (2018). How to fix the future: Staying human in the digital age. London, UK: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Kern, R. (2012). Literacy-based language teaching. In Burns, A. & Richards, J. C. (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 186–194). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C., A'Ness, F., & Lam, W. (2000). Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning and Technology, 4(2), 78–104.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Lanier, J. (2018). Ten arguments for deleting your social media accounts right now. London, UK: Vintage.Google Scholar
Levy, M., & Caws, C. (2016). CALL design and research: Taking a micro and macro view. In Caws, C. & Hamel, M.-J. (Eds.), Language-learner computer interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications (pp. 89–113). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Levy, M., & Moore, P. (2017). Language and technology: Theory and practice, options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. In Son, J.-B. & Windeatt, S. (Eds.), Language teacher education and technology: Approaches and practices (pp. 19–34). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data. London, UK: John Murray.Google Scholar
Mills, K. A. (2016). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material and sensory lenses. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mishan, F. (2017). “Authenticity 2.0”: Reconceptualising “authenticity” in the digital era. In Maley, A. & Tomlinson, B. (Eds.), Authenticity in materials development for language learning (pp. 10–24). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. London, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Online Etymology Dictionary. (2001). Input. Retrieved from www.etymonline.com/search?q=inputGoogle Scholar
Pegrum, M., Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2018). Digital literacies revisited. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 7(2), 3–24.Google Scholar
Steel, C., & Levy, M. (2013). Language students and their technologies: Charting the evolution 2006–2011. ReCALL, 25(3), 306–320.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. & Seidlhofer, B. (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, M., Reinders, H., & Warschauer, M. (Eds.). (2013). Contemporary computer-assisted language learning. London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development. In Burns, A. & Richards, J. C. (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 269–278). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1998). Context, community and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 705–716.Google Scholar
Zyzik, E., & Polio, C. (2017). Authentic materials myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar