Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:23:42.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research in Language-Literature Instruction: Meeting the Call for Change?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2011

Kate Paesani
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to assess whether recent scholarship on language-literature instruction—the deliberate integration of language development and literary study at all levels of the foreign language curriculum—within the context of U.S. institutions of higher education reflects shifts in thinking regarding the role of literature in foreign language curricula. These shifts have come in response to the 2007 Report of the Modern Language Association Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages, which recommended replacing the traditional two-tiered program structure with more coherent curricula that merge language and content, and to the general questioning of communicative language teaching as a viable method for language instruction and adequate preparation for advanced-level work in a foreign language. Current approaches to language-literature instruction and foreign language curriculum design favor multimodal language development that places equal importance on oral and written language and interpretative interaction with literature to construct textual meaning and establish form-meaning connections. This review surveys empirical and classroom practice research on literature in language courses and language in literature courses and concludes with a consideration of larger curricular issues and areas for future research.

Type
SECTION C: TOPICS IN INTEGRATED APPROACHES
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 31 , March 2011 , pp. 161 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Kern, R., & Schultz, J. M. (2005). Beyond orality: Investigating literacy and the literary in second and foreign language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 89, 381–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxim, H. H. (2006b). Integrating textual thinking into the introductory college-level foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 90, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modern Language Association Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. Profession 2007, 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polio, C., & Zyzik, E. (2009). Don Quixote meets ser and estar: Multiple perspectives on language learning in Spanish literature classes. Modern Language Journal, 93, 550–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, J. M. (2009). A Standards-based framework for the teaching of literature within the context of globalization. In Scott, V. M. (Ed.), Principles and practices of the Standards in college foreign language education (pp. 128–143). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Swaffar, J., & Arens, K. (2005). Remapping the foreign language curriculum: An approach through multiple literacies. New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar

REFERENCES

Allen, H. W. (2009a). In search of relevance: The Standards and the undergraduate foreign language curriculum. In Scott, V. M. (Ed.), Principles and practices of the Standards in college foreign language education (pp. 38–52). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Allen, H. W. (2009b). Moving beyond the language-literature divide: Advanced pedagogy for tomorrow's foreign language professors. ADFL Bulletin, 41, 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, H. W. (2009c). A multiple literacies approach to the advanced French writing course. French Review, 83, 368–385.Google Scholar
Allen, H. W., & Paesani, K. (2010). Exploring the feasibility of a pedagogy of multiliteracies in introductory foreign language courses. L2 Journal, 2, 119–142.Google Scholar
Alvstad, C., & Castro, A. (2009). Conceptions of literature in university language courses. Modern Language Journal, 93, 170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2006). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century. New York, NY: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) and the National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project.Google Scholar
Arens, K. (2008). Genres and the Standards: Teaching the 5 C's through texts. German Quarterly, 81, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M. A. (1991). Language and literature: False dichotomies, real allies. ADFL Bulletin, 22, 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrette, C. M., Paesani, K., & Vinall, K. (2010). Toward an integrated curriculum: Maximizing the use of target language literature. Foreign Language Annals, 43, 216–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, E. (1995). Teaching literature or teaching students? ADFL Bulletin, 26, 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, E. (2005). Progress and procrastination in second language reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, E. (2009). Bridging the gap: A literacy-oriented approach to teaching the graphic novel Der erste frühling. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 42, 152–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H. (1998). Constructing curricula in collegiate foreign language departments. In Byrnes, H. (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages (pp. 262–295). New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (Ed.). (2006). Perspectives: Interrogating communicative competence as a framework for collegiate foreign language study. Modern Language Journal, 90, 244–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., Crane, C., Maxim, H. H., & Sprang, K. A. (2006). Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum instruction. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Kord, S. (2002). Developing literacy and literary competence: Challenges for foreign language departments. In Scott, V. M. & Tucker, H. (Eds.), SLA and the literature classroom: Fostering dialogues (pp. 35–72). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Maxim, H. H. (2004). Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Sinicrope, C. (2008). Advancedness and the development of relativization in L2 German: A curriculum-based longitudinal study. In Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H. (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 109–138). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., Weger-Guntharp, H. D., & Sprang, K. (2005). Educating for advanced foreign language capacities. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R. (2007). Literature and language teaching, 1986–2006: A review. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chute, H. (2008). Comics as literature? Reading graphic narrative. PMLA, 123, 452–465.Google Scholar
Davidheiser, J. C. (2007). Fairy tales and foreign languages: Ever the twain shall meet. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donato, R., & Brooks, F. B. (2004). Literary discussions and advanced speaking functions: Researching the (dis)connection. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eigler, F. (2009). From comprehension to production: Literary texts in the advanced foreign language classroom. ADFL Bulletin, 41, 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisler, M. E. (2008). The MLA report on foreign languages: One year into the future. Profession 2008, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, K. M. (2009). Creating e-learning communities in language and literature classes. In Lancashire, I. (Ed.), Teaching literature and language online (pp. 331–342). New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Hall, G. (2005). Literature in language education. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, S. D. (1993). The integration of language, literature, and culture: Goals and curricular design. ADFL Bulletin, 24, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirvela, A. (2001). Connecting reading and writing through literature. In Belcher, D. & Hirvela, A. (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections (pp. 109–134). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hirvela, A. (2005). ESL students and the use of literature in composition courses. Teaching English in the Two Year College, 33, 70–77.Google Scholar
Hoecherl-Alden, G. (2006). Connecting language to content: Second language literature instruction at the intermediate level. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, E. F., & James, D. (1986). Toward the integration of foreign language and literature teaching at all levels of the college curriculum. ADFL Bulletin, 18, 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, D. (2000). Kleiner mann, was nun? In Terry, R. M. (Ed.), Agents of change in a changing age (pp. 237–270). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. P. (2010). Electronic literary texts: A survey of tools and some strategies for developers. CALICO Journal, 27, 477–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kern, R. (2004). Literacy and advanced foreign language learning: Rethinking the curriculum. In Byrnes, H. & Maxim, H. H. (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 2–18). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Kern, R. (2008). Making connections through texts in language teaching. Language Teaching, 41, 367–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraemer, A. (2008a). Engaging the foreign language learner: Using hybrid instruction to bridge the language-literature gap. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
Kraemer, A. (2008b). Happily ever after: Integrating language and literature through technology? Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 41, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1985). Literary texts in the classroom: A discourse. Modern Language Journal, 69, 356–366.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C., & Kramsch, O. (2000). The avatars of literature in language study. Modern Language Journal, 84, 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maley, A., & Duff, A. (1989). The inward ear: Poetry in the language classroom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mantero, M. (2002). Bridging the gap: Discourse in text-based foreign language classrooms. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantero, M. (2006). Applied literacy in second language education: (Re)framing discourse in literature-based classrooms. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxim, H. H. (2005). Enhancing graduate student teacher development through curricular reform. ADFL Bulletin, 36, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxim, H. H. (2006a). Giving beginning adult language learners a voice: A case for poetry in the foreign language classroom. In Retallack, J. & Spahr, J. (Eds.), Poetry and pedagogy: The challenge of the contemporary (pp. 251–259). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxim, H. H. (2008). Developing advanced formal language abilities along a genre-based curriculum. In Katz, S. L. & Watzinger-Tharp, J. (Eds.), Conceptions of L2 grammar: Theoretical approaches and their application in the L2 classroom (pp. 172–188). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Maxim, H. H. (2009). An essay on the role of language in collegiate foreign language programmatic reform. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 42, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwan, E. K. (2009). Incorporating the Standards into a 3R model of literary and cultural analysis. In Scott, V. M. (Ed.), Principles and practices of the Standards in college foreign language education (pp. 144–160). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Melin, C. (2010). Between the lines: When culture, language, and poetry meet in the classroom. Language Teaching, 43, 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, N. A. (2011). Teaching assistants’ self-efficacy in teaching literature: Sources, personal assessments, and consequences. Modern Language Journal, 95, 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkoff, P. (2006). Talking it over in class. In Paran, A. (Ed.), Literature in language teaching and learning (pp. 45–57). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar
Muyskens, J. A. (1983). Teaching second-language literatures: Past, present and future. Modern Language Journal, 67, 413–423.Google Scholar
Nance, K. A. (2010). Teaching literature in the languages: Expanding the literary circle through student engagement. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (2008). The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paesani, K. (2004). Using literature to develop foreign language proficiency: Toward an interactive classroom. In Stivale, C. J. (Ed.), Modern French literary studies in the classroom: Pedagogical strategies (pp. 13–25). New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Paesani, K. (2005). Literary texts and grammar instruction: Revisiting the inductive presentation. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paesani, K. (2006a). Exercices de style: Developing multiple competencies through a writing portfolio. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 618–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paesani, K. (2006b). A process-oriented approach to Zazie dans le métro. French Review, 79, 762–778.Google Scholar
Paesani, K. (2009). Exploring the stylistic content of Exercices de style. French Review, 82, 1268–1280.Google Scholar
Paran, A. (2008). The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching: An evidence-based survey. Language Teaching, 41, 465–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, P. C. (2008). The discipline of foreign language studies and reforming foreign language education. Modern Language Journal, 92, 296–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pireddu, N. (2008). Literature? C'est un monde: The foreign language curriculum in the wake of the MLA report. Profession 2008, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, C. (2009). The MLA recommendations: Can we get there from here? ADFL Bulletin, 41, 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queneau, R. (1947). Exercices de style. Paris, France: Galimard.Google Scholar
Redmann, J. (2005). An interactive reading journal for all levels of the foreign language curriculum. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redmann, J. (2008). Reading Kästner's Emil und di Detektive in the context of a literacy-oriented curriculum. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 41, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinner, S., & Weigart, A. (2005). From sports to the EU community: Integrating curricula through genre-based culture courses. In Byrnes, H., Weger-Guntharp, D., & Sprang, K. (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities (pp. 136–151). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schechtman, R. R., & Koser, J. (2008). Foreign languages and higher education: A pragmatic approach to change. Modern Language Journal, 92, 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, J. M. (1995). Making the transition from language to literature. In Haggstrom, M. A., Morgan, L. Z., & Wieczorek, J. A. (Eds.), The foreign language classroom: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Garland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, V. M. (2009). Principles and practices of the Standards in collegiate foreign language education. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Scott, V. M., & Huntington, J. A. (2007). Literature, the interpretive mode, and novice learners. Modern Language Journal 91, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, V. M., & Huntington, J. A. (2008). Reading culture: Using literature to develop C2 competence. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 622–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, V. M., & Tucker, H. (2002). SLA and the literature classroom: Fostering dialogues. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Sprang, K. A. (2008). Advanced learners’ development of systematic vocabulary knowledge: Learning German vocabulary with inseparable prefixes. In Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H. (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 139–162). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steinhart, M. M. (2006). Breaching the artificial barrier between communicative competence and content. Modern Language Journal, 90, 258–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. A., & Santiago, K. A. (2006). Using the literary text to engage learners in a multilingual community. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 683–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaffar, J. (2006). Terminology and its discontents: Some caveats about communicative competence. Modern Language Journal, 90, 246–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaffar, J., Arens, K., & Byrnes, H. (1991). Reading for meaning: An integrated approach to language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Viswamohan, A., & Torche, U. (2007). Literature and media in an ESP classroom. In Beaven, B. (Ed.), IATEFL 2006 Harrogate Conference Selections (pp. 104–5). Canterbury, UK: International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language (IATEFL).Google Scholar
Walther, I. (2007). Ecological perspectives on language and literacy: Implications for foreign language instruction at the collegiate level. ADFL Bulletin, 38, 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, I. (2009). Curricular planning along the fault line between instrumental and academic agendas: A response to the report of the Modern Language Association on Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 42, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, C. (2009). Hey, you! The Germans! Using literary pragmatics to teach language as culture. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 42, 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G., & Zyngier, S. (2007). Literature and stylistics for language learners. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber-Fève, S. (2009). Integrating language and literature: Teaching textual analysis with input and output activities and an input-to-output approach. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellmon, C. (2008). Languages, cultural studies, and the futures of foreign language education. Modern Language Journal, 92, 292–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurst, K. A. (2008). How do we teach language, literature, and culture in a collegiate environment and what are the implications for graduate education? Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 41, 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zyzik, E., & Polio, C. (2008). Incidental focus on form in university Spanish literature classes. Modern Language Journal, 92, 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar