Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:16:32.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multilingualism in the Workplace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Britt-Louise Gunnarsson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This survey article presents studies on multilingualism in the workplace carried out in different regions. One aim is to give a cross-cultural picture of workplace studies on different languages, and another is to discuss both positive and problem-based accounts of multilingualism at work. The conditions for workplace discourse have been influenced by a series of changes taking place in recent decades. Technological advances have led to new types of networks and workplaces, making linguistic issues salient, at the same time as many low-paid workers are found in traditional jobs, for which the face-to face interaction is central. A model is presented, the aim of which is to grasp the complex and dynamic interplay between workplace discourse and its various contextual frames. Overviews of studies on multilingualism at work are discussed with a focus on workplaces in the inner, outer, and expanding English circles; in transnational companies; and in multilingual regions and English lingua franca workplaces in Europe. Workplaces with workforce diversity are also dealt with. In the discussion section, the scope is enlarged and workplace discourse is related to various contextual frameworks. Finally, some key topics for future studies are sketched.

Type
SECTION B: INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIETAL MULTILINGUALISM
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 33 , March 2013 , pp. 162 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hill, P., & van Zyl, S. (2002). English and multilingualism in the South African engineering workplace. World Englishes, 21, 23–35.

In their investigation of the engineering profession in South Africa, Hill and van Zyl found a complex picture of language practices. A high standard of English was found to be crucial for young black engineers in the companies that had a policy of English only at management and interdepartmental level and in written communication. Site observations and interviews, however, revealed that Afrikaans and indigenous African language were often used in the workplace to “get the work done” (p. 23). Most young black engineers were multilingual, which was found to be a positive force for cooperation with workers who did not know English. In the South African engineering companies, multilingualism was thus found to be a significant professional resource for young engineers.

Kelly-Holmes, H., & Mautner, G. (Eds.). (2010). Language and the market. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

This volume is of relevance for workplace multilingualism as it includes several chapters that give a critical perspective on market processes related to recruitment of staff and workplace language. Three chapters (earlier discussed in this article) explore how languages, accents, and varieties are manipulated and controlled by actors in the employment market in Asia: Cowie (pp. 33–43) reported on a study of the call center industry in India, Lorente (pp. 44–55) analyzed maid agency advertisements in Singapore, and Herat and McLoughlin (pp. 56–67) reported on language requirements in Sri Lankan advertisements. Of relevance for workplace multilingualism is also Gunnarsson's (pp. 171–184) study on how Swedish multinationals represent linguistic diversity on their corporate websites, and Hilgendorf's (pp. 68–80) report of the growth of English as a corporate language in Germany.

Kingsley, L. (2009). Explicit and implicit dimensions of language policy in multilingual banks in Luxembourg. Language Problems & Language Planning, 33, 153–173.

This article reports on a study of language policy and language use in banks in the multilingual context of Luxembourg. Two international banks with staff from different European countries and with varied mother tongues were studied. The discrepancy between explicit language management policies and reported language use practices were revealed, showing the importance of both top-down and bottom-up pressures on language practices.

Li, D. (2000). The pragmatics of making requests in the L2 workplace. A case study of language socialization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 58–87.

This article presents a longitudinal study of a Chinese woman with a college background, who newly had arrived in the United States. Li's ethnographic research focused on language socialization in the workplace. Narratives, interviews with interlocutors, and recordings of interaction were used to explore the double socialization: into a new work environment and into a new language and culture. Through exposure and participation in social interaction, and with the assistance of experts or more competent peers, this Chinese woman came to internalize work-related language and cultural norms and develop a communicative competence in English that made her function at work.

Lønsmann, D. (2011). English as corporate language. Language choice and language ideologies in an international company in Denmark (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.

This case study can be said to illustrate the complexity of multilingualism in a European working environment. In her Ph.D. thesis, Lønsmann explored a Danish pharmaceutical company that had recently gone international and adopted English as its corporate language. With regard to language competence, the company was a diverse environment, and both the choice of English and the choice of Danish meant that some employees became excluded. Exploring what values the employees attached to different languages, Lønsmann found that beliefs about how language should function in a Danish company contributed to the construction of boundaries between groups such as Danes and foreigners and the attribution of value to these groups. A shared belief among the staff was that Danish is the natural language in Denmark, and also foreigners were classified in relation to their knowledge of Danish.

Roberts, C. (2011). Gatekeeping discourse in employment interviews. In Candlin, C. N. & Sarangi, S. (Eds.), Handbook of communication in organizations and professions (pp. 407–432). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.

Roberts and her colleagues at King's College London have explored problems facing immigrants at work in United Kingdom in a number of studies. This chapter includes a critical discussion of employment interviews. According to the author, the competency-based selection procedure, which is standard practice in the English-speaking world, constructs a so-called linguistic penalty for those groups it is designed to help. Roberts further used examples from two studies, based on video recorded interviews and associated feedback data, to illustrate how the candidates who are most successful manage to seamlessly institutional and personal discourses.

REFERENCES

Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York, NY: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Akar, D. (2002). The macro contextual factors shaping business discourse: The Turkish case. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40, 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, H. (2010). Interkulturell kommunikation på ett svenskt sjukhus. Fallstudier av andraspråkstalare i arbetslivet (Digitala skrifter från Nordiska språk 2). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Angouri, J., & Harwood, N. (2008). “This is too formal for us. . .” A case study of variation in the written products of a multinational consortium. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22, 38–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baoueb, L. B. (2009). Social factors for code-switching in Tunisian business companies: A case study. Multilingua, 28, 425–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., & Harris, S. (Eds.). (1997). The language of business. An international perspective. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bausser, J. J. (2000). The role of language in international business and technical communication: A case study of a non-native speaker of English in the U.S. workplace. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61 (05), 1821A.Google Scholar
Bilbow, G. (1997). Cross-cultural impression management in the multicultural workplace: The special case of Hong Kong. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 461–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilbow, G. (2002). Commissive speech act use in intercultural business meetings. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börestam, U. (1991). Språkmöten och mötesspråk i Norden (Nordisk språksekretariats rapporter 16). Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Bothorel-Witz, A., & Choremi, T. (2009). Le plurilinguisme dans les entreprises à vocation internationale: Comment saisir ce phénomène pluridimensionnel à travers le discours des acteurs? Sociolinguistica, 23, 104–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breckle, M. (2005). Deutsch-schwedische Wirtschaftskommunikation. Werkstattreihe Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Briguglio, C. (2005). Developing an understanding of English as a global language for a business setting. Linguistic Insights—Studies in Language and Communication, 29, 313–344.Google Scholar
Campbell, S., & Roberts, C. (2007). Migration, ethnicity, and competing discourse in the job interview: Synthesizing the institutional and the personal. Discourse and Society, 18, 243–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M., & Louhiala-Salminen, L. (2007). Vems språk talas, vilken är verksamhetskulturen? In Kangas, O. & Kangasharju, H. (Eds.), Svenskt i Finland - finskt i Sverige. 4, Ordens makt och maktens ord (pp. 416–47). Helsinki, Finland: Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
Charles, M., & Marschan-Piekkari, R. (2002). Language training for enhanced horizontal communication. A challenge for MNCs. Business Communication Quarterly, 65, 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. A. (2003). The use of the English language in the Korean workplace. A focus on the manufacturing industry. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 4251-A.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1994). Inter-cultural communication at work: Cultural values in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, S. (2010). Getting things done in the L1 and L2: Bilingual immigrant women's use of communication strategies in entrepreneurial contexts. Bilingual Research Journal, 33, 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, D., Brown, T. P., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Beyond language: Workplace communication and the L2 worker. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 17, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, C. (2010). “Anyone doing something phonetic can attract business these days”: The demand and supply of accents in the Indian call centre industry. In Kelly-Holmes, H. & Mautner, G. (Eds.), Language and the market (pp. 33–43). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowling, J. D. (2007). Needs analysis: Planning a syllabus for a series of intensive workplace courses at a leading Japanese company. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 426–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, D. (1992). Communication in a multicultural workplace: Procedural matters. In Crischel, H. (Ed.), Intercultural communication: Proceeding of the 17th international L.A.U.D. symposium. Duisburg, Germany: University of Duisburg.Google Scholar
Day, D., & Wagner, J. (2007). Bilingual professionals. In Auer, P. & , L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication (pp. 391–404). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneire, M. (2008). English in the French workplace: Realism and anxieties. World Englishes, 27, 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, P., Wong, P., & Early, M. (2000). Learning language for work and life: The linguistic socialization of immigrant Canadians seeking careers in health care. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 9–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenreich, S. (2010). English as a business lingua franca in a German multinational corporation. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 408–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Extra, G., & Gorter, D. (2008). The constellation of languages in Europe: An inclusive approach. In Extra, G. & Gorter, D. (Eds.), Multilingual Europe: Facts and policies (pp. 3–60). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, L. (2001). Ways of doing, ways of being: Language, education and “working” identities. Language and Education, 14, 57–74.Google Scholar
Firth, A. (Ed.). (1995a). The discourse of negotiation. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Firth, A. (1995b). Talking for a change: Commodity negotiating by telephone. In Firth, A. (Ed.), The discourse of negotiation (pp. 183–222). Berlin, Germany: De GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, P. (2007). Differences and difficulties in intercultural management interaction. In Kotthoff, H. & Spenser-Oatey, H. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 263–284). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franziskus, A. (2012, August). Language ideologies, meta-linguistic discourse and the positioning of cross-border workers in a multilingual workplace environment. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 19, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Friginal, E. (2007). Outsourced call centers and English in the Philippines. World Englishes, 26, 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order. London, UK: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Gimenez, J. (2002). New media and conflicting realities in multinational corporate communication: A case study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, T. (1997). Two languages at work: Bilingual life on the production floor. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C., & Evans, S. (2000). A survey of language use in the professional workplace in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 60–82.Google Scholar
Grieve, A. (2010). “Aber ganz ehrlich”: Differences in episodic structure, apologies, and truth-orientation in German and Australian workplace telephone discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 190–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grin, F., Sfreddo, C., & Vaillancourt, F. (Eds.). (2010). The economics of the multilingual workplace. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grossi, V. (2011). Intercultural communication in the workplace: Insights from the Australian context. Linguistic Insights—Studies in Language and Communication, 146, 257–278.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, B.-L. (Ed.). (2005). The immigrant and the workplace (TeFa nr 41). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, B.-L. (2009a). Professional discourse. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, B.-L. (2009b). Discourse in organizations and workplaces. In Wei, L. & Cook, V. (Eds.), Contemporary applied linguistics: Vol. 2. Linguistics for the real world (pp. 121–141). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, B.-L. (2010). Multilingualism within transnational companies. An analysis of company policy and practice in a diversity perspective. In Kelly-Holmes, H. & Mautner, G. (Eds.), Language and the market (pp. 171–184). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L., & Lockwood, J. (2009). The workplace, the society and the wider world: The offshoring and outsourcing industry. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, S., & Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2003). Business as a site of language contact. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. (2007). Multilingualism and transnationalism. In Auer, P. & , L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication (pp. 539–553). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herat, M., & McLoughlin, L. (2010). Recruiting the best: English, job adverts, and the private job market in Sri Lanka. In Kelly-Holmes, H. & Mautner, G. (Eds.), Language and the market (pp. 56–67). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, R. (2008). The capital's “language shortfall” and migrants’ economic survival. Economic and Social Research Council, UK Research Report: R000 22 1846.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R. (2012). Multilingualism in the workplace. In Martin-Jones, M., Blackledge, A., & Cheese, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of multilingualism (pp. 267–280). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hilgendorf, S. K. (2010). English and the global market: The language's impact in the German business domain. In Kelly-Holmes, H. & Mautner, G. (Eds.), Language and the market (pp. 68–80). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, P., & van Zyl, S. (2002). English and multilingualism in the South African engineering workplace. World Englishes, 21, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J., Marra, M., & Vine, B. (2011). Leadership, discourse, and ethnicity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J., & Riddiford, N. (2010). Professional and personal identity at work: Achieving a synthesis through intercultural workplace talk. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 22, 6.Google Scholar
Iedema, R., & Scheeres, H. (2003). From doing to talking work: Renegotiating knowing, doing, and talking. Applied Linguistics, 24, 316–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jämtelid, K. (2002). Texter och skrivande i en internationaliserad affärsvärld. Flerspråkig textproduktion vid ett svenskt storföretag. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. E. (2010). The evolving role of Spanish in North Alabama and language contact phenomena. Dissertation Abstracts International, 70 (08), 2981A.Google Scholar
Kangasharju, H. (2007). Interaktion och inflytande. Finländare och svenskar vid mötesbordet. In Kangas, O. & Kangasharju, H. (Eds.), Ordens makt och maktens ord. Svenskt i Finland—Finskt i Sverige IV (pp. 341–377). Helsinki, Finland: Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
Kankaanranta, A. (2005). English as a corporate language: Company-internal e-mail messages written by Finns and Swedes. In Gunnarsson, B.-L. (Ed.), Communication in the workplace (pp. 42–59) (TeFa nr 42).Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Kankaanranta, A. (2007). “Could you pls comment on this!” E-post på engelska mellan finländare och svenskar. In Kangas, O. & Kangasharju, H. (Eds.), Ordens makt och maktens ord. Svenskt i Finland—Finskt i Sverige IV (pp. 448–464). Helsinki, Finland: Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In Quirk, R. & Widdowson, H. (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–36). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kassim, H., & Ali, F. (2010). English communicative events and skills needed at the workplace. Feedback from the industry. English for Specific Purposes, 29, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly-Holmes, H., & Mautner, G. (Eds.). (2010). Language and the market. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsley, L. (2009). Explicit and implicit dimensions of language policy in multilingual banks in Luxembourg. Language Problems & Language Planning, 33, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleifgen, J. (2001). Assembling talk: Social alignments in the workplace. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, M. (2004). Australian Finns on the verge of language shift. Virittaja, 108, 200–223.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, M. (2010). French, minority language in the workplace: The linguistic representations of linguistic insecurity. Nouvelles Perspectives en Sciences Sociales, 6, 17–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, D. (2000). The pragmatics of making requests in the L2 workplace. A case study of language socialization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 58–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, D. C. S. (2007). Multilingualism and commerce. In Auer, P. & , L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication (pp. 422–443). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Li, S. F., & Mead, K. (2000). An analysis of English in the workplace: The communication needs of textile and clothing merchandisers. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 351–368.Google Scholar
Lønsmann, D. (2011). English as corporate language. Language choice and language ideologies in an international company in Denmark (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.Google Scholar
Lorente, B. P. (2010). Packaging English-speaking products: Maid agencies in Singapore. In Kelly-Holmes, H. & Mautner, G. (Eds.), Language and the market (pp. 44–55). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louhiala-Salminen, L., & Kankaanranta, A. (2005). “Hello Monica, kindly change your arrangements”: Business genres in a state of flux. In Gillaerts, P. & Gotti, M. (Eds.), Genre variation in business letters: Linguistic insights (pp. 55–84). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lüdi, G. (2010). Are “diversity management” and monolingualism compatible? About learning and using foreign languages in a context of globalization. Language Teaching, 43, 494–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüdi, G., Barth, L. A., Höchle, K., & Yanaprasart, P. (2009). La gestion du plurilinguisme au travail entre la “philosophie” de l'entreprise et les pratiques spontanées. Sociolinguistica, 23, 32–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markaki, V., & Mondada, L. (2012). Embodied orientations towards co-participants in multinational meetings. Discourse Studies, 14, 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlow, M. L., & Giles, H. (2010). “We won't get ahead speaking like that!” Expressing and managing language criticism in Hawai'i. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheux-Pelletier, G. (2007). Face-to-face interaction in the multilingual workplace: Social and political aspects of language use in Montreal (Quebec). Dissertation Abstracts International, 67 (11), 4162A.Google Scholar
McCall, C. (2003). Language dynamics in the bi- and multilingual workplace. In Bayley, R. & Schecter, S. (Eds.), Language socialization in bilingual and multilingual societies (pp. 235–250). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mednick Myles, J. (2005). Communicative competence in the workplace. A look at the experiences of English second language engineering students during their professional internships. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66 (2), 477A.Google Scholar
Mettewie, L., & Van Mensel, L. (2009). Multilingualism at all costs: Language use and language needs in business in Brussels. Sociolinguistica, 23, 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. (2000). Negative assessments in Japanese-American workplace interaction. In Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 240–254). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2004). Ways of “doing being plurilingual” in international work meetings. In Gardner, R. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 27–60). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Nair-Venugopal, S. (2001). The sociolinguistics of choice in Malaysian business settings. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 152, 21–52.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. (2010). Andraspråkstalare i arbete. En språkvetenskaplig studie av kommunikation vid ett svenskt storföretag (Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för nordiska språk, 82). Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish Science Press.Google Scholar
Nickerson, C. (2000). Playing the corporate language game: An investigation of the genres and discourse strategies in English used by Dutch writers working in multinational corporations. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikko, T. (2007). Skapandet av betydelser på sammanträden vid finsk-svenska fusionerade företag. In Kangas, O. & Kangasharju, H. (Eds.), Svenskt i Finland - finskt i Sverige. 4, Ordens makt och maktens ord (pp. 378–415, 478). Helsinki, Finland: Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
O'Connell, S. (2006). The impact and role of high language competency and cultural intelligence on workplace communication: An analysis of Australian expatriates in Japan. Japan Journal of Multilingualism and Multiculturalism, 12, 26–53.Google Scholar
Omar, H. K. (2010). Arab American entrepreneurs: Investigating experiences from Texas. Dissertation Abstracts International, 70 (08), 2854A.Google Scholar
Otsuji, E., & Pennycook, A. (2011). Social inclusion and metrolingual practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14, 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer-Silveira, J. C., Ruiz-Garrido, M. F., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (Eds.). (2006). International and intercultural business communication. Theory, research and teaching. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pan, Y., Scollon, S. W., & Scollon, R. (2002 ). Professional communication in international settings. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Park, S.-J. (2011). The promise of English: Linguistic capital and the neoliberal worker in the South Korean job market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14, 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phaahla, P. (2010). Multilingualism in a global village: What is the future of a local language (e.g., Northern Sotho) in an increasingly globalized world? South African Journal of African Languages, 30, 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peoples, J., & Bailey, G. (2003). Humanity. An introduction to cultural anthropology (6th ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Thomson.Google Scholar
Pereira, M. G. D. (2004). Constructing identities and searching for partnerships in a meeting of Portuguese and Brazilian businessmen. In Gouveia, C. A. M., Silvestre, C., & Azuga, L. (Eds.), Discourse, communication, and the enterprise. Linguistic perspectives (pp. 169–194). Lisbon, Portugal: University of Lisbon Centre for English Studies.Google Scholar
Poncini, G. (2003). Multicultural business meetings and the role of languages other than English. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 24, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppi, F. (2011). Mediating between local and global practices: The use of English as the lingua franca for internal company communications. Linguistic Insights—Studies of Language and Communication, 146, 235–255.Google Scholar
Pullin, P. (2010). Small talk, rapport, and international communicative competence. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, T. (2009). Language ideology, identity, and the commodification of language in the call centers of Pakistan. Language in Society, 38, 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, G., & Wagner, J. (2002). Language choice in international telephone conversation. In Luke, K. K. & Pavlidou, T. (Eds.), Telephone calls, unity, and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures (pp. 111–131). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridell, K. (2008). Dansk-svenska samtal i praktiken. Språklig interaktion och ackommodation mellan äldre och vårdpersonal i Öresundsregionen (Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för nordiska språk 76). Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish Science Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. (2007a). Multilingualism in the workplace. In Auer, P. & , L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication (pp. 405–22). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. (2007b). Intercultural communication in healthcare settings. In Kotthoff, H. & Spenser-Oatey, H. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 243–262). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. (2010). Language socialization in the workplace. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. (2011). Gatekeeping discourse in employment interviews. In Candlin, C. N. & Sarangi, S. (Eds.), Handbook of communication in organizations and professions (pp. 407–432). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, J. (2002). “. . .Yeah, I could hire this one, but I know it's gonna be a problem”: How race, nativity, and gender affect employers’ perceptions of the manageability of job seekers. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Xing, J. (2004). Rapport management problems in Chinese-British business interactions: A case study. House, In J. & Rehbein, J. (Eds.), Multilingual communication (pp. 197–221). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, H. (2011). East-west business communication from an East Asian perspective. Linguistic Insights—Studies in Language and Communication, 146, 211–233.Google Scholar
Tange, H. (2008). Global commitment or local grievances? An assessment of the Grundfos language policy. Hermes, 41, 155–173.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. A. (2008). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Language policy in multilingual organizations. Language Awareness, 17, 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virkkula-Raeisaenen, T. (2010). Linguistic repertoires and semiotic resources in interaction. A Finnish manager as mediator in a multilingual meeting. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 505–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J. (1995). Negotiating activity in technical problem solving. In Firth, A. (Ed.), The discourse of negotiation (pp. 223–246). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar