Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:56:48.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A meeting of the minds: Broadening horizons in the study of linguistic discrimination and social justice through sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2022

Rachel Elizabeth Weissler
Rachel Elizabeth Weissler*
Affiliation:
University of Oregon, College of Arts and Sciences
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract 1

Understanding social justice as it relates to linguistic discrimination and identity requires consideration of both production and perception. As linguists and cognitive psychologists become more attuned to talking about social justice, the need to discuss linguistic human behaviors through a sociocognitive lens becomes more pertinent than ever. This article offers a sociocognitive approach to linguistic analysis as a means to combat linguistic discrimination in the pursuit of social justice. Having negative ideologies about a particular group of people, especially a minoritized group, influences linguistic prediction and perceptions. Together, sociolinguistic and psychological methodologies are necessary to navigate a world in which people use linguistic knowledge to make decisions and predictions about their interlocutors. I use sociocognitive approaches as vehicles for social justice, centering African American English and Anti-Black Racism. The limited existing sociocognitive linguistic research indicates that listeners may modulate their linguistic expectations during cognitive processing based on speaker identity and stereotypes of speakers. As linguistic discrimination is ever-present in U.S. society, in addition to describing sociocognitive solutions, this article also represents a call to action for researchers to empirically test ideological claims about linguistic varieties that are passively accepted, strengthen replicability, and broaden approaches to the study of minoritized varieties more generally. Hopefully, this article will inspire linguistics researchers to consider all factors, cognitive and social, related to linguistic perception, further contributing to a greater understanding of how to combat linguistic discrimination from a multidimensional frame.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 42 , March 2022 , pp. 137 - 143
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, A. (2005). Voice, Footing, Enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker-Bell, A. (2020). Linguistics justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. & Shousterman, C. (2010). Second generation West Indian Americans in New York City. English Today, 26(3), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (1999). “Why Be Normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society, 28(2), 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charity-Hudley, A. H, Mallinson, C. & Bucholtz, M. (2020). Toward racial justice in linguistics: Interdisciplinary insights into theorizing race in the discipline and diversifying the profession. Language, 96(4), 200–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craft, J. T., Wright, K. E., Weissler, R. E., & Queen, R. M. (2020). Language and discrimination: Generating meaning, perceiving identities, and discriminating outcomes. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhardt, J. L., Goff, P. A., Purdie, V. J., & Davies, P. G. (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 876–893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G.; McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanulíková, A., Van Alphen, P. M., Van Goch, M. M., & Weber, A. (2012). When one person's mistake is another's standard usage: The effect of foreign accent on syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 878–887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holliday, N. (2020). Kamala Harris and the prosody of parody. Language Log, University of Pennsylvania. https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=49201.Google Scholar
Holliday, N. (2021). Prosody and sociolinguistic variation in American Englishes. Annual Review of Linguistics, 7, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, N., & Villarreal, D. (2020). Intonational variation and incrementality in listener judgments of ethnicity. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 11(1), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S. (2021). Rethinking race and place: The role of persona in sound change reversal. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 25(2), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanehart, S. (2009). African American Women's language: Discourse, education and identity. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Liu, P., Rigoulot, S., & Pell, M. (2014). Culture modulates the brain response to human expressions of emotion: Electrophysiological evidence. Neuropsychologia, 67, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendoza-Denton, N. (1995). Pregnant pauses: Silence and authority in the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas hearings. Gender Articulated: Language and the Social Constructed Self, 51–66.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(3), 141–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 204–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papoutsaki, A., Sangkloy, P., Laskey, J., Daskalova, N., Huang, J., & Hays, J. (2016, July). Webgazer: scalable webcam eye tracking using user interactions. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 3839–3845).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purnell, T., Idsardi, W., & Baugh, J. (1999). Perceptual and Phonetic Experiments on American English Dialect Identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 10–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, J. R., & King, K. (2016). Language and linguistics on trial: Hearing Rachel Jeantel (and other vernacular speakers) in the courtroom and beyond. Language, 92, 948–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobe, T. (2016). Creepy-ass cracker in post-racial America: Don West's examination of Rachel Jeantel in the George Zimmerman murder trial. Text & Talk, 36(5), 613–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. (2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. R, & Reaser, J. (2004). Delimiting perceptual cues used for ethnic labeling of African American and European American Voices. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 54–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of California San Francisco Center for the Study of Racism, Social Justice, and Health (n.d.). Anti-Black Racism. Retrieved from https://mrc.ucsf.edu/racial-equity-anti-black-racism.Google Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J., Van den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 580–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissler, R. E., & Brennan, J. R. (2020). How do listeners form grammatical expectations to African American Language? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 25(2), 135–141.Google Scholar
Weissler, R. E. (2021). Leveraging African American English knowledge: Cognition and multidialectal processing (Publication No. 28844409). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar
Weldon, T. L. (2021). Middle Class African American English. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W. (2007). Sociolinguistic folklore in the study of African American English. Language and Linguistic Compass, 1(4), 292–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, K. (2020). Raciolinguistic profiling: Passing for American means speaking without an accent. [Colloquium]. University of Kent.Google Scholar