Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:12:40.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linguistics and Literacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Gloria Kindell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the good old days, when learning to read was equated with breaking the written code and linguists were content with delving into the mysteries of phonemes, morphemes, and sentences, it was not too terribly difficult to define the scope of linguistics applied to literacy. Now the task is somewhat more complex thanks to both the diversification of lingustics and current concepts of the nature, function, and goals of literacy.

Type
Literacy Issues
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 4 , March 1983 , pp. 8 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Akinnaso, F. N. 1982. The literate writes and the nonliterate chants: Written language and ritual communication in sociolinguistic perspective. In Frawley, W. (ed.) Linguistics and literacy. New York: Plenum Press. 7–36. [Topics in Language and Linguistics Series.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allington, R. L. 1983. Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The reading teacher. 36.6.556–561.Google Scholar
Beaugrande, R. de. 1982. The story of grammars and the grammar of stories. Jouranl of pragmatics. 6.5/6.383–421. [Special issue on stories.]Google Scholar
Braslavsky, B. P. 1982. Conocimientos lingüísticos para el aprendizaje de la lectura. Lectura y vida. 3.3.4–11.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, L. I. 1983. A alfabetização de um pova ágrafo. Boletim 4 da ABRALIM. 102–115.Google Scholar
Brown, G. 1982. The spoken language. In Carter, R. (ed.) Linguistics and the teacher. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 75–87. [Language, Education and Society Series.]Google Scholar
Cagliari, L. C. 1982. Leitura e alfabetização. Cadernos de estudos lingüísticos. 3.6–20.Google Scholar
Calfee, R. 1982. Some theoretical and practical ramifications of story grammars. Journal of pragmatics. 6.5/6.441–450. [Special issue on stories.]Google Scholar
Carter, R. (ed.) 1982. Linguistics and the teacher. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. [Language, Education and Society Series.]Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. 1983. Adult assistance to language development: Scaffolds, models, and direct instruction. In Parker, R. P. and Davis, F. A. (eds.) Developing literacy: young childern's use of language. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. 3–18.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Tannen, D. (ed.) Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, NJ:Ablex. 35–53.Google Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, J. and Gumperz, J. J.. 1981. From oral to written: The transition to literacy. In Whiteman, M. F. (ed.) writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written discourse. Vol. 1. Variation in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 89–109.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 1981. Directions in applied linguistics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Davis, F. A.. 1983. Developing literacy: Observation, analysis, and mediation in schools. In Parker, R. P. and Davis, F. A. (eds.) Developing literacy: Young childern's use of language. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. 156–172.Google Scholar
Davison, A. and Kantor, R. N.. 1982. On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts: A case study from adaptations. Reading research quarterly. 17.2.187–209.Google Scholar
Deyes, A. F. 1983. Relevância didática da análise do discurso. Boletim 4 da ABRALIM. 126–142.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. 1979. Linguistic insight: Threshold of reading acquisition. In Waller, T. G. and MacKinnon, G. E. (eds.) Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press. 63–114.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. W. 1982. Spelling, reading, language variation. In Frawley, W. (ed.) Linguistics and literacy. New York: Plenum Press. 257–267. [Topics in Language and Linguistics Series.]Google Scholar
Fortune, D. and Fortune, G. (eds.) 1982. Iny tyyriti/Iny Tykyriti: Cartilha karajá; Brasília, Brazil: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Frawley, W. (ed.) 1982. Linguistics and literacy. New York: Plenum Press. [Topics in Language and Linguistics Series.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freebody, P. and Anderson, R. C.. 1983. Effects of vocabulary difficulty, text cohesion, and schema availability on reading comprehension. Reading research quarterly. 18.3.277–294.Google Scholar
Gomes de Matos, F. 1983. A checklist of pluridisciplinary criteria for the evaluation of materials used in the teaching-learning of the mother tongue in primary and secondary schools in Brazil. Paper presented at the International Pluridisciplinary Symposium on Structures, Content, Methods and Techniques in Educations in Developing Countries.UNESCO.Paris,April 25–29.Google Scholar
Gomes de Matos, F.. In press. Política de educação em língua materna no nordeste e avaliação pluridisciplinar de materiais para alfabetização e l°- grau. Recife, Brazil: SUDENE.Google Scholar
Green, G. M. 1981. Competence for implicit text analysis: Literary style discrimination in five-year olds. In Tannen, D. (ed.) Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 142–163.Google Scholar
Haberlandt, K. and Bingham, G.. 1982. The role of scripts in the comprehension and retention of texts. Text. 2.1/3.29–46. [Special issue: New developments in cognitive processing.]Google Scholar
Kato, M. A. 1983. O ensino de línguas após a implantação da lingüistica. Boletim 4 da ABRALIM. 51.59.Google Scholar
Kindell, G. E. 1982. Discourse strategies in Kaingáng literacy materials. Washington, DC: Georgetown University. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Koch, I. G. V. 1983. Algumas reflexões sobre o ensino da leitura. Paper presented at the 35a Reunião anual da Socieded Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência. Belém, Brazil, 07 6–13.Google Scholar
Langer, J. A. and Smith-Burke, M. T.. 1982. Preface. In Langer, J. A. and Smith-Burke, M. T. (eds.) Reader meets author—Bridging the gap: A psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspective. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Lemle, M. 1982. A tarefa da alfabetização—Etapas e problemas no protuguês. Letras de hoje. 15.4.41–60.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, G. E. and Waller, T.G. 1981. (eds.) Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, N. 1983. Using story grammar to assess reading comprehension. The reading teacher. 36.7.616–620.Google Scholar
Matsuyama, U. K. 1983. Can story grammar speak Japanese?. The reading teacher. 36.7.666–669.Google Scholar
Michaels, S. 1981. “Sharing time”: Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in society. 10.3.423–442.Google Scholar
Miller, J. R. and Kintsch, W.. 1981. Knowledge-based aspects of prose comprehension. Text. 1.3.215–232.Google Scholar
Moldofsky, P. B. 1983. Teaching students to determine the central story problem: A practical application of schema theory. The reading teacher. 36.8.740–745.Google Scholar
Ong, W. J., S. J. 1982. Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. P. and Davis, F. A. (eds.) 1983. Developing literacy: Young children's use of language. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Perera, K. 1982. The assessment of linguistic difficulty in reading material. In Carter, R. (ed.) Linguistics and the teacher. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 101–113. [:Language, Education and Society Series.]Google Scholar
Rosenberg, S. (ed.) 1982. Handbook of applied psycholiguistics: Major thrusts of research and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. 1980. A theoretical taxonomy of the differences between oral and written language. In Spiro, R., Bruce, B., and Brewer, W. (eds.) Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 411–438.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. W. 1982. What should the language strand in a reading program contain? The reading teacher. 35.7.806–812.Google Scholar
Spiro, R., Bruce, B., and Brewer, W. (eds.) 1980. Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Steinberg, D. D. 1982. Psycholinguistics: Language, mind and word. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (ed.) 1981. Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1982b. The myth of orality and literacy. In Frawley, W. (ed.) Linguistics and literacy. New York: Plenum Press. 37–50. [Topics in Language and Linguistics Series.]Google Scholar
Tannen, D., 1983. Coherence in spoken and written discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Taylor, N. E. and Connor, U.. 1982. Silent vs. oral reading: The reational instructional use of both processes. The reading teacher. 35.4.440–443.Google Scholar
Tough, J. 1983. Children's use of language and learning to read. In Parker, R. P. and Davis, F. A. (eds.) Developing literacy: Young children's use of language. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. 55–67.Google Scholar
Tuana, E. J. 1982. El libro de lectura de primero grado escolar. Lectura y vida. 3.2.13–17.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. 1981. Discourse studies and education. Applied linguistics. 2.1.1–26.Google Scholar
Waller, T. G. and MacKinnon, G. E (eds.) 1979. Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Whiteman, M. F. (ed.) 1981. Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written discourse. Vol. 1. Variation in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Willows, D. M., Borwick, D., and Hayvren, M., 1981. The content of school readers. In MacKinnon, G. E. and Waller, T. G. (eds.) Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press. 97–175.Google Scholar
Zalusky, V. L. 1982. Relationships: What did I write? what did I say? In Frawley, W. (ed.) Linguistics and literacy. New York: Plenum Press. 91–124. [Topics in Language and Linguistics Series.]Google Scholar