Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:32:24.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language Testing Research (1979–1980)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

John W. Oller Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper will address the following questions:

1. What is language proficiency?

2. What is the relationship between first and second language proficiency?

3. What major theories have been born or laid to rest in the last year or so?

4. Can any consensus be discerned in the various extant controversies?

Although the review will concentrate on research published or presented at professional meetings on testing in the last year, some of the themes will necessitate reference to earlier work, and much that might be considered relevant by other authors will be omitted. The objective is to set down as much as possible to identify controversial issues for what they are, and to highlight emerging trends as best I can them.

Type
Psycholinguistics
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 1 , March 1980 , pp. 124 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alderson, , Charles, J.. 1979a. Scoring procedures for use on cloze tests. Paper presented at the TESOL convention, Boston.Google Scholar
Alderson, , Charles, J.. 1979b. The cloze procedure and proficiency in English as a foreign language. TESOL quarterly. 13. 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, , Charles, J.. 1979c. The effect on the cloze of changes in deletion frequency. Journal of research in reading. 2. 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, , Charles, J.. 1980. Native and non-native speaker performance on cloze tests. Language learning. 30.59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacheller, , Frank, . 1980. Communicative effectiveness as predicted by judgments of the severity of learner errors in dictation. In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, K. (eds.) Research in language testing. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 66–71.Google Scholar
Bachman, , Lyle, F. and Palmer, Adrian S.. 1980a. The construct validation of the traits “communicative competence in speaking” and “communicative competence in reading.” Paper presented at the TESOL convention, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Bachman, , Lyle, F. and Palmer, Adrian S.. 1980b. Basic concerns in test validation. Paper presented at the South East Asian Ministers of Education Organization RELC Fifteenth Regional Seminar, Singapore.Google Scholar
Bachman, , Lyle, F. and Palmer, Adrian S.. 1980c. Trait and method factors in language proficiency test scores. Paper persented at the Language Testing Conference, University of New Mexico Linguistic and TESOL Summer Institutes, Albuqueque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Bezanson, , Keith, and Hawkes, Nicolas. 1976. Bilingual reading skills of primary school children in Ghana. Working papers on bilingualism. 11.44–73.Google Scholar
Binet, , Alfred, . 1911. New investigation upon the measure of the intellectual level among school children. L'Annee psychologique. 145–205.Google Scholar
[Also In Binet, A. and Simon, Thomas. 1916. The development of intelligence in children. Tr. Kite, E.. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 274–329.]Google Scholar
Brown, , Douglas, H.. 1980. Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Brutsch, , Susanna, M. 1979. Convergent/discriminant validation of prospective teacher proficiency in oral and written production of French by means of the MLA Cooperative Foreign Language Proficiency Tests, French Direct Proficiency Tests for Teachers (TOP and TWP), and self–ratings. University of Minnesota, Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Canale, , Michael, . 1980. A Communicative approach to second language teaching and testing. Paper presented at the South East Asian Ministers of Education Organization RELC Fifteenth Regional Seminar, Singapore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canale, , Michael, and Swain, Merrill. 1979. Theoretical bases of communication appoaches to second language teaching and testing. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Carroll, , John, B. 1961. Fundamental considerations in testing for English language proficiency of foreign students. In Center for Applied Linguistics, Testing the English proficiency of foreign students. Washington, D.C.: CAL.Google Scholar
[Reprined in Allen, H. B. and Campbell, R. N. (eds.) 1972. Teaching English as a second language: A book of reading. New York: McGraw-Hill. 313–321.]Google Scholar
Carroll, , John, B. 1980. Psychometric theory and language testing. Paper presented at the Second International Language Testing Symposium, Darmstadt, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. and Horn, J. L.. 1978. A cross-social on the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence with discovery of new valid subtest designs. Journal of educational measurement. 15. 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, , Noam, . 1972. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Clark, , John, L. B. 1972. Foreign language testing: Testing and practice. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculam Development.Google Scholar
Clifford, , Ray, T. 1978. Reliability and validity of language aspects contributing to oral proficiency of prospective teachers of German. In Clark, John L. D. (eds.) Direct testing of speaking proficiency: Theory and application. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Clifford, , Ray, T. and Lowe, Pardee. 1980. Language testing: A dynamic model and a static model. Paper presented at the Second International Language Testing Symposium, Darmstadt, Germany.Google Scholar
Cohen, , Andrew, D. 1980. Testing language ability in the classroom. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Carrigan, , Anne, and Upshur, John A.. 1978. Test method linguistic factors in foreign language tests. Paper presented at the TESOL convention, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Culler, , Jonathan, . 1976. Ferdinand de Saussure. New York: Penguin Modern Masters.Google Scholar
Cummins, , James, . 1979. Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age, and some other matters. Working papers on bilingalism. 19.198–205.Google Scholar
Cummins, , James, . 1980. The construct of language proficiency in bilingual education. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Cziko, , Gary, A. 1980a. Psychometric and edumetric approaches to language testing: Implications and applications. Paper presented at the TESOL convention, San Francisco.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cziko, , Gary, A. 1980b. Language competence and reading errors. Language learning. 30.101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damico, , Jack, S. and Oller, J. W. Jr. 1980. Pragmatic versus morphological/ syntactic criteria for language referrals. Language speech and hearing services in schools. 11.85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damico, , Jack, S., Goldstein, G., Wintheiser, C., and Oller, J. W. Jr. 1980. The structure of language proficiency in chilgren with communicative disorders. Paper presented at the Language Testing Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Damico, , Jack, S., Storey, Mary Ellen, and Oller, J. W. Jr. 1980. Diagnosing language disorders in bilingual children: Pragmatic versus surface oriented criteria. Paper presented at the Second Annual TESOL Summer Meeting in conjuction with the Linguistic and TESOL Summer Institutes at the University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Davies, , Alan, . 1980. John Oller and the restoration of the test. Paper presented at the Second International Language Testing Symposium, Darmstadt, Germany.Google Scholar
Evola, J., Mamer, E., and Lentz, B.. 1980. Discrete point and global scoring for cohesive devices. In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, K. (eds.) Research in language testing. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 177–181.Google Scholar
Farhady, , Hossein, . 1979a. The disjunctive fallacy between discrete point and integrative tests.. TESOL quarterly. 13.347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farhady, , Hossein, . 1979b. Test bias in language placement examinations. Paper presented at the TESOL convention, Boston.Google Scholar
Farhady, , Hossein, . 1980a. New directions for ESL proficiency testing. Paper presented at the Language Testing Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Hossein, Farhady. 1980b. On the plausibility of the unitary language proficiency factor. Paper presented at the Language Testing Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Flahive, , Douglas, E. 1980. Separating the g factor from reading comprehension. In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, K. (eds.) Research in language testing. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fodor, , Jerry, A. 1975. The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, B. 1978. A look at the content similarities between intelligence, achievement, personality, and language tests. In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, (eds.) Language in education: Testing the tests. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Harman, H. H. 1976. Modern factor analysis 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, , Michael, A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hinofotis, , Frances, B. 1980. Communicative competence in an educational environment. Paper presented at the South Asia Ministers of Education Organization RELC Fifteenth Regional Seminar, Singapore.Google Scholar
Hinofotis, , Frances, B., Bailey, Kathleen M., and Stern, Susan M.. 1979. Assessing the oral proficiency of prospective foreign teaching assistants. Paper presented at the TESOL convention, Boston. [At the colloquium on language testing organized by P. Groot and A. S. Palmer.]Google Scholar
Ingram, E. 1978. The psycholinguistic basis. In Spolsky, B. (ed.) Advances in language testing: Series 2, Approaches to language testing. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Jensen, , Arthur, R. 1980. Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig, . 1973. Partial dictation as a test of foreign language proficiency. Swedish–English Contrastive Studies Report No. 3. Department of English, Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Jones, , Randall, . 1980. Testing oral languaguage proficiency: Is it possible? Plenary invited lecture at the Second International Language Testing Symposium, Darmstadt, Germany.Google Scholar
Joreskog, K. G. 1969. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 34.183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaczmarek, C. 1980. Scoring and rating essay tasks. In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, K. (eds.) Research in language testing. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kaufman, , Alan, S. 1979. Intelligent testing with the WISC–R. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kazelskis, R. 1978. A correction for loading bias in principal components analysis. Educational and psychological measurement. 38.2.253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerlinger, , Fred, N. 1979. Behavioral research: A conceptual approach. New York: Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Klein-Braley, , Christine, . 1980. A cloze is a cloze is a question. Paper presented at the Second International Language Testing Symposium, Darmstadt, Germany.Google Scholar
Krashen, , Stephen, D. 1977a. The monitor model for adult second language performance. In Burt, M. K., Dullay, H., and Finocchiaro, M., (eds.) Viewpoints on English as a second language. New York: Regents. 152–161.Google Scholar
Krashen, , Stephen, D. 1977b. Some issues relating to the monitor model. In Brown, H. D., Yorio, C., and Crymes, R. (eds.) On TESOL '77. Washington, D. C.: TESOL. 144–158.Google Scholar
Krashen, , Stephen, D.. 1977c. Second language acquisition and second language testing. Paper presented at the annual ACTFL meeting. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, , Eric, H. 1976. Language and general intelligence. In Nancy, A. Johnoson (ed.) Current topics in language. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop. 197–199.Google Scholar
[Reprinted from Lenneberg, E. H.. 1964. New directions in the study of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT.]Google Scholar
Munby, , John, , 1978. Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nunnally, , Jum, C. 1967. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. Jr. 1976. Evidence for a general of language proeficiency: An expectancy grammar. Die neuren sprachen. 76.165–174.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. Jr. 1978. How important is language proficiency to IQ and other educational tests? In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, K. (eds.) Language in education: Testing the tests. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 1–16.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. Jr. 1979. Language tests at school: A pragmatic approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. Jr. and Chesarek, Steve. In Press. Achievement, non–verbal intelligence, and language: A bilingual case study. Paper Presented, in draft form, at the TESOL convention, Boston. 1979.Google Scholar
In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Streiff, V.. In press. (eds.) The language factor: More tests of tests. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. Jr. and Hinofotis, Frances B.. 1980. Two mutually exclusive hypotheses about second language proficiency: Indivisible or partially divisible competence? In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, K. (eds.) Research in language testing. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, Kyle (eds.) 1978. Language in education: Testing the tests. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, Kyle. 1979. A further comment on language proficiency as a source of variance in certain affective measures. Language learning. 28.417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, Kyle (eds.) 1980. Research in language testing. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. Jr. and Streiff, Virginia. In press. The language factor: More tests of tests. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Patterson, F., 1978. Conversations with a gorilla. National geographic. 153.438–465.Google Scholar
Porch, , Bruce, . 1980. Multidimensional quantification and language processing. Paper presented at the Language Testing Conference, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Purcell, , Edward, T. 1980. Models of pronunciation accuracy. Paper presented at the Language Testing Conference, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Saussure, , de, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in general linguistics. Edited by Bally, Charles, Sechehaye, Albert, and Riedlinger, Albert and translated by Baskin, Wade. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Searle, , John, . 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, , George, , Hendricks, Debby, Spurling, Randon, Johnson, Marianne, and Vandenburg, Lela. 1980. Is language ability divisible or unitary? A factor analysis of 22 English language proficiency tests. In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, K. (eds.) Research in language testing. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 24–33.Google Scholar
Scott, , Robert, . 1979. The measure of adult English language proficiency: Final report. Austin, TX: Resourde Development Institute.Google Scholar
Spolsky, , Bernard, . 1973. What does it mean to know a language? Or how do you get someone to perform his competence? In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Richards, J. C. (eds.) Focus on the learner: Pragmatic perspectives for the language teacher. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 164–176.Google Scholar
Stendahl, , Christina, . 1972. The relative proficiency in their native language and in English as shown by Swedish students of English at university level. Projektet sprakfardighet i Engelska (SPRENG), Rapport 6. Engelska institutionen, Goteborgs Universitet [as cited by Johansson, 1973].Google Scholar
Streiff, , Virginia, . 1980a. Cloze in the classroom with notes on needed research. Paper presented at the TESOL convention, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Streiff, , Virginia, . 1980b. The roles of language in educational testing. Paper presented at the Conference on Language Testing, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Stump, , Thomas, A. 1978. Cloze and dictation tasks as predictors of intelligence and achievement scores. In Oller, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, K. (eds.) Language in education: Testing the tests. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 36–65.Google Scholar
Swain, , Merrill, , Lapkin, Sharon, and Barik, Henri. 1976. The cloze test as a measure of second language proficiency for young children. Working papers on bilingualism. 11.34–42.Google Scholar
Truus, S. Sentence construction in Englishand Swedish in the writings of Swedish students of English at university level: A pilot study. Projecktet sprakfardighet i Engelska (SPRENG), Rapport 7. Engelska institutionen, Goteborgs Universitet [as cited by Johansson, 1973].Google Scholar
Upshur, , John, A. 1969. Productive communication testing: A progress reeport. Paper presented at the second International Congress of Applied Linguistics, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
[Also in Perren, G. E. and Trim, J. L. M. (eds.) 1971. Selected papers of the second international congress of applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 435–441.Google Scholar
Reprinted in Oller, J. W. Jr. and Richards, J. C. (eds.) 1973. Focus on the learner: Pragmatic perspectives for the language teacher. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.]Google Scholar
Upshur, , John, A. 1980. Some language test relations at successive ability levels. Paper presented at the Second International language Testing Symposium, Darmstadt, Germany.Google Scholar
Upshur, , John, A. and Palmer, Adrian S.. 1972. Measures of accuracy, communicativity, and social judgments for two classes of foreign language speakers. Paper presented at the Third International Congress of Applied Linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
[Also in Verdoodt, A. (ed.) 1974 AILA proceedings, Copenhagen 1972: Applied sociolinguistics. III. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.Google Scholar
Vollmer, , Helmut, J. 1979. Why are we interested in “general language proficiency”? Paper presented at the First International Language Testing symposium, Hurth, Germany.Google Scholar
[Also in Klein-Braley, C. and Stevenson, D. K. (eds.) 1980. Proceedings of the 1979 German international symposium on language testing. I. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang Verlag.]Google Scholar
Vollmer, , Helmut, J. and Sang, Fritz. 1980. Competing hypotheses about second language ability: A plea for caution. Berlin: Osnabruck.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1978. Teaching language as communication. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yorozuya, R. and Oller, J. W. Jr. 1980. Oral proficiency scales: construct validity and the halo effect. Language learning. 30.135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar