Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:28:29.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and Computers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Chin-Chuan Cheng
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Language, writing, and the computer, as Wang (1986) states, must rank among the highest of our most important inventions since each has profoundly determined the development of the human species. There have been numerous interactions among these three types of human institutions. Writing, of course, is largely a reflection of language. Since its inception four decades ago, the computer has depended on various forms of language and writing to communicate with its human creators. Some of these forms were specially invented programming languages for a small breed of people.

Type
Language and the Professions
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 7 , March 1986 , pp. 34 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Amsler, R. A. 1984. Machine-readable dictionaries. In Williams, M. E. (ed.) Annual review of information science and technology. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications. 19.161–209.Google Scholar
Ando, K., et al. (eds.) 1983. FLEAT special lectures. Tokyo: Ochanomizu Shobo. [Lectures specially delivered at the First International Conference on Foreign Language Education and Technology, Tokyo, 1981; cf., J. C. Hutchinson, pp. 36–39, P. Strevens, pp. 47–51, R. B. Kaplan, pp. 65–74.)Google Scholar
Automatic Language Processing Advisory Committee. 1966. Languages and machines. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Becker, D. A. 1986. Software for printing South Asian scripts. In Daily, J. C. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1986 IBM academic information systems university AEP conference “Tools for Learning”.Milford, CT:IBM Academic Information Systems. 2.91–100.Google Scholar
Becker, J. D. 1986. Multilingual word processing. In Wang, W. S-Y. (ed.) Language, writing, and the computer. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. 86–96.Google Scholar
Burghardt, W. 1984. Language authoring with “Comet.” Computers and the humanities. 18.3/4.165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., and Richman, B. (eds.) 1971. The American heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. and Jamieson, J.. 1983. Language lessons on the Plato IV system. System. 11.1.13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. H. and Cheng, C. C.. 1976. Computer-assisted instruction in Chinese: An interim report. Journal of Chinese linguistics. 4.2/3.278–298.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. C. 1985. Microcomputer-based user interface. Information technology and libraries. 4.4.346–351.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. C.. 1986. An authoring system for computer-assisted instruction in Chinese. In Chinese Language Computer Society. Proceedings of the 1986 international conference on Chinese computing.Singapore:National University of Singapore. 239–244.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. C. and Murphy, K. R.. 1984. The IBM PC as a public terminal on LCS. Information technology and libraries. 3.1.62–68.Google Scholar
Chung, U. 1985. An introduction to interactive video. Studies in language learning. 5.1.97–103.Google Scholar
Cole, P., Lebowitz, R., and Hart, R.. 1984. Teaching Hebrew with the aid of computers: The Illinois program. Computers and the humanities. 18.2.87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrel, G. W. and Small, S. L.. 1984. Viewing parsing as word sense discrimination: A connectionist approach. In Bara, B. G. and Guida, G. (eds.) Computational models of natural language processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 91–119.Google Scholar
Danielson, W. A. 1985. The writer and the computer. Computers and the humanities. 19.2.85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G. 1986. Authoring CALL courseware: A practical approach. In Leech, G. and Candlin, C. N. (eds.) Computers in English language teaching and research. London: Longman. 12–29.Google Scholar
Feldman, J. A. and Ballard, D. H.. 1982. Connectionist models and their properties. Cognitive science. 6.205–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, N. and Hart, R. (eds.) 1985-to date. Software reviews. Foreign language annals.Google Scholar
Gray, J. C. 1986. Creating the electronic New Oxford English Dictionary. Computers and the humanities. 20.1.45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, B. J. and Sidner, C. L.. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational linguistics. 12.3.175–204.Google Scholar
Hart, R. 1981. Language study and the PLATO system. Studies in language learning. 3.1.1–24.Google Scholar
Hewitt, H. J. 1985. Computers, bibliography, and foreign language typography. Computers and the humanities. 19.2.89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, G. S. 1986. Interactive audio/video hardware configurations. CALICO journal. 4.1.39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, P. S. 1986. PHRED: A generator for natural language interfaces. Computational linguistics. 11.4.219–242.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. 1985. Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions? In Dowty, D. R., Karttunen, L., and Zwicky, A. M. (eds.) Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 206–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. 1986. An interactive lookup system. In Lambert, S. and Ropiequet, S. (eds.) CD ROM: The new papyrus. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press. 195–196.Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1985. Parsing in functional unification grammar. In Dowty, D. R., Karttunen, L., and Zwicky, A. M. (eds.) Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettunen, K. 1986. Is MT linguistics? Computational linguistics. 12.1.37–38.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C., Morgenstern, D., and Murray, J. H.. 1985. An overview of the MIT Athena language learning project. CALICO journal. 2.4.31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucera, H. and Francis, W. N.. 1967. A computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Lea, W. (ed.) 1980. Trends in speech recognition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Leech, G. 1986. Automatic grammatical analysis and its educational applications. In Leech, G. and Candlin, C. N. (eds.) Computers in English language teaching and research. London: Longman. 207–214.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P. and Bennett, W. S.. 1985. Human language and computers. Computers and the humanities. 19.2.77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D. and Davis, E.. 1986. Interactive video for language learning: The AUTOTUTOR project. System. 14.1.29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marty, F. 1981. Reflections on the use of computers in second-language acquisition. System. 9.2.85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marty, F.. 1982. Reflections on the use of computers in second-language acquisition. System. 10.1.1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, D. and Paperno, S.. 1986. An authoring system as a tool for foreign language learning. In Daily, J. C. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1986 IBM academic information systems university AEP conference “Tools for Learning”.Milford, CT:IBM Academic Information Systems. 2.32–35.Google Scholar
Niesz, A. J. 1986. Interactive videodisk and foreign language learning. In Daily, J. C., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1986 IBM academic information systems university AEP conference “Tools for Learning”.Milford, CT:IBM Academic Information Systems. 2.48–59.Google Scholar
Noblitt, J. S., Sol, D. F., and Pet, W. J. A.. 1986. Bilingual word processing: A new tool for learning. In Daily, J. C. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1986 IBM academic information systems university AEP conference ”Tools for Learning”.Milford, CT:IBM Academic Information Systems. 2.36–44.Google Scholar
Otto, F. 1981. Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) in language teaching and learning. In Kaplan, R. B. et al. (eds.) Annual review of applied linguistics, I. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 58–69.Google Scholar
Owen, D. I. A. 1986. Computerized Sumerian dictionary of the third millennium. In Daily, J. C., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1986 IBM academic information systems university AEP conference “Tools for Learning.”Milford, CT:IBM Academic Information Systems. 2.2–10.Google Scholar
Purcell, E. T. 1985. Recent developments in computer aided instruction. In Kaplan, R. B. et al. (eds.) Annual review of applied linguistics, V. New York: Cambridge University Press. 82–90.Google Scholar
Pusack, J. P. and Otto, S. E. K.. 1984. Blueprint for a comprehensive foreign language CAI curriculum. Computers and the humanities. 18.3/4.195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedelow, S. Y. 1985. Computational lexicography. Computers and the humanities. 19.2.97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, M. A. and Davis, D. M.. 1986. Understanding computer-based education. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Slocum, J. 1985b. Machine translation. Computers and the humanities. 19.2. 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slocum, J.. 1986. Is MT linguistics? Computational linguistics. 12.2.125.Google Scholar
Stevens, V. et al. 1986. New ideas in software development for linguistics and language learning. CALICO journal. 4.1.15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolurow, L. M. 1986. Needs and development opportunities for educational software for foreign language instruction in schools. Computers and the humanities. 20,2,79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, R. 1986. Inexpensive use of the videodisc for proficiency: An attempt to link technology and teachers. CALICO journal. 4.1.67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 1986. Adapting dBase II: The use of database management systems in English teaching and research. In Leech, G. and Candlin, C. N. (eds.) Computers in English language teaching and research. London: Longman. 112–131.Google Scholar
Tomita, M. 1986. Efficient parsing for natural language. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, A. B. Jr., and Nirenburg, S.. 1984. Machine translation: A contemporary view. In Williams, M. E. (ed.) Annual review of information science and technology, 19. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications. 129–160.Google Scholar
Urdang, L. 1984. A lexicographer's adventures in computing. Datamation. 30.3.185–194.Google Scholar
Waltz, D. L. and Pollack, J. B.. 1985. Massively parallel parsing: A strongly interactive model of natural language interpretation. Cognitive science. 9.51–74.Google Scholar
Webb, S. 1985. The stages in the development of a prototype CALI using interactive video. CALICO journal. 3.2.38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winograd, T. 1986. Computer software for working with language. In Wang, W. S-Y. (ed.) Language, writing, and the computer. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. 61–72.Google Scholar
Woods, W. A. 1970. Transition network grammars for natural language analysis. Communications of the association of computing machinery. 13.591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, D. H. 1984. ESL applications of the computer-controlled videodisc player. Computers and the humanities. 18.3/4.243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar