Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:23:40.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONTEXT AND LITERACY PRACTICES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2005

Stephen Reder  and
Erica Davila
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This chapter reviews recent progress in resolving tensions between conceptions of literacy as a system of locally situated cultural practices and conceptions of literacy as a broader system of written language that transcends specific individuals and local contexts. Such theoretical tensions have arisen out of earlier, long-standing literacy debates—the Great Divide, the Literacy Thesis, and even debates about situated cognition itself. Recent reviews and critiques of the “New Literacy Studies” examined here—Brandt and Clinton, 2002; Collins and Blot, 2003; Street, 2003a, 2003b—are reaching toward new theoretical ground to address emerging concerns about the adequacy of current literacy theories framed in terms of locally situated social practices. This new work should be of interest not only to those working in the field of literacy but also to applied linguists in general, because the core issues have to do with the nature and role of context in language use, whether in oral or written form.

Type
LITERACY STUDIES
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 25 , March 2005 , pp. 170 - 187
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton D. 2001. Directions for literacy research: Analysing language and social practices in a textually mediated world. Language and Education, 15 (2 & 3), 92– 104.Google Scholar
Barton D., & Hamilton M. 1998. Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
Barton D., Hamilton M., & Ivanič R. (Eds.) 2000. Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
Besnier N. 1995. Literacy emotion, and authority: Reading and writing on a Polynesian atoll. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Biber D. 1986. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language, 62, 384– 414.Google Scholar
Blommaert J. 2204 Writing as a problem: African grassroots writing, economics of literacy, and globalization. Language in Society, 33 (5), 643– 671.Google Scholar
Brandt D. 1995. Sponsors of literacy. College Composition and Communication, 49, 165– 185.Google Scholar
Callon M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology knowledge (pp. 196– 233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Engeström Y., Engeström R., & Kärkkäinen M. 1995. Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319– 336.Google Scholar
Feldman C. F. 1991. Oral metalanguage. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 47– 65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Finnegan R. 1988. Literacy and orality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Gee J. P. 1988. The legacies of literacy: From Plato to Freire through Harvey Graff. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 195– 212.Google Scholar
Gee J. 1991. Social linguistics: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer Press.
Goody J. 1986. The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goody J., & Watt I. 1963. The consequences of literacy. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5 (3), 304– 345.Google Scholar
Graff H. J. 1979. The literacy myth. New York: Academic Press.
Graff H. J. 1987. The labyrinths of literacy. London: Falmer.
Greenfield P. 1972. Oral or written language: The consequences for cognitive development in Africa, the United States, and England. Language and Speech, 15, 169– 178.Google Scholar
Halverson J. 1991. Olson on literacy. Language in Society, 20, 619– 640.Google Scholar
Halverson J. 1992. Goody and the implosion of the literacy thesis. Man, 27, 301– 317.Google Scholar
Havelock E. 1963. Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hayes E. (in press). Reconceptualizing adult literacy education and the digitial divide. In A. Belzer & H. Beder (Eds.), Defining and improving quality in adult education: Issues and challenges. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Heath S. B. 1982. Protean shapes in literacy events: Ever shifting oral and literate traditions. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring literacy and orality (pp. 91– 118). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Heath S. B. 1983. Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
Hull G. (in press). Shaping future selves in workplaces and vocational education: An identity framework for exploring adult development. In A. Belzer & H. Beder (Eds.), Defining and improving quality in adult education: Issues and challenges. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kim J. 2003. Challenges to NLS: Response to “What's ‘new’ in New Literacy Studies”. Current Issues in Comparative Education [Online], 5 (2). Retrieved November 4, 2004, from http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/articles/jk152.htm.Google Scholar
Kress G. & van Leeuwen T. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour B. 1987. Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Law J. 1994. Organizing modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lemke J. L. 1998. Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 283– 302). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Levi-Strauss C. 1962. The savage mind. London: Trafalgar Square.
McLuhan M. 1962 The Gutenberg galaxy. New York: Signet.
Ohta A. S. 2004. The ZPD and adult L2 development: Beyond social interaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Portland OR, May 1–4.
Olson D. R. 1977. From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257– 281.Google Scholar
Olson D. R. 1988. Mind and media: The epistemic functions of literacy. Journal of Communication, 38 (3), 27– 36.Google Scholar
Olson D. R. 1994. The world on paper. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Olson D. R., & Torrance N. (Eds.). 1991. Literacy and orality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ong W. J. 1982. Orality and literacy. London: Methuen.
Reder S. 1992. Getting the message across: Cultural factors in the intergenerational transfer of cognitive skills. In T. Sticht, B. McDonald, & M. Beeler (Eds.), The intergenerational transfer of cognitive skills. Volume II: Theory and research in cognitive science (pp. 202– 228). Newark, DE: Ablex.
Reder S. 1993. Watching flowers grow: Polycontextuality and heterochronicity at work. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 15 (4), 116– 125.Google Scholar
Scribner S., & Cole M. 1978. Literacy without schooling: Testing for intellectual effects. Harvard Educational Review, 29 (2), 96– 106.Google Scholar
Scribner S., & Cole M. 1981. The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shultz J. J., Florio S., & Erickson F. 1982. Where's the floor? Aspects of the cultural organization of social relationships in communication at home and in school. In P. Gilmore & A. A. Glatthorn (Eds.), Children in and out of school (pp. 91– 123). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Street B. V. 1984. Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Street B. V. (Ed.) 1993. Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Street B. V. 1995. Social literacies. London: Longman.
Tannen D. 1982. The myth of orality and literacy. In W. Frawley (Ed.) Linguistics and literacy (pp. 37– 50). New York: Plenum Press.
Wenger E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.