Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:47:03.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communicative processes and strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Robert M. DeKeyser
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When the learner of a non-native language actually uses this language for communication, he draws on the L2 skills acquired so far, and on various other sources of knowledge and skill that are relevant to the communicative task. The more advanced the learner is, the more s/he will be able to rely on his/her L2 skills in a way that is analogous to the L1 speaker's use fo his/her individual linguistic competence. The less advanced learner will have to rely more on his/her metalinguistic knowledge (to the extent that it is available) and on a variety of ways to reduce the gap between, on the one hand, the L2 knowledge and skills available to him/her and, on the other hand, the means necessary to convey the intended message, either by using additional resources (L1, gestures, and so on) or by reducing the message to be conveyed. The term communicative processes [hereafter CP] will be used for the reliance on L2 knowledge and skills, and the term communicative strategies or communication strategies [hereafter CS] for the learner's attempts at bridging the gap between these resources and the message to be conveyed. (There is no clear-cut separation between these two mental activities, of course, as the use of CS encompasses the incorporation of whatever relevant fragments of L2 knowledge and skill happen to be available.)

Type
Social/psychological factors in sla
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 9 , March 1988 , pp. 107 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Unannotated Bibliography

Anderson, J. 1983. The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. 1985. Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. and Ryan, E. B.. 1985. A metacognitive framework for the development of first and second language skills. In Forrest-Pressley, D., MacKinnon, G., and Waller, T. (eds.) Metacognition, cognition and human performance. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. 207–252.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. and Ryan, E. B.. and Smith, M. Sharwood. Interlanguage is not a state of mind: An evaluation of the construct for second language acquisition. Applied linguistics. 6. 2101–117.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. 1988. Units of oral expression and language learning in small group inter-action. Applied linguistics. 9. 1. 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H. 1987. Second language acquisition: Insights from a proficiency orientation. In Byrnes, H. and Canale, M. (eds.) Defining and developing proficiency: Guidelines, implementations and concepts. Lincolnwood, IL: National Texbook Company. 107–131.Google Scholar
Cazden, C., et al. 1975. Second language acquisition sequences in children, adolescents and adults: Final report. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Institute of Education, Office of Research Grants. [Project 730744, Grant NE-6–00–3–0014.]Google Scholar
d'anglejan, A., Painchaud, G., and Renaud, C.. 1986. Beyond the language classroom: A study of communicative abilities in adult immigrants following intensive instruction. TESOL quarterly. 20. 2. 185–205.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R., 1986. From learning to acquisition? Foreign language development in a U. S. classroom and during a semester abroad. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R.. In press. Communicative behavior in a foreign language: Individual differences in monitoring and communication strategies. International review of applied linguistics.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1987a. Two approaches for investigating second language acquisition in context. In Ellis, R. (ed.) Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 3–29.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1987b. Contextual variability in second language acquistion and the relevancy of language teaching. In Ellis, R. (ed.) Second language aquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 179–194.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1987c. Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in second language acquisition. 9. 1. 1–19.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1987d. Sources of intra-learner variability in language use and their relationship to second language acquisition. Paper presented at a symposium: Variation and Second Language Acquisition. Ann Arbor, MI, 10.Google Scholar
Faerch, C. and Kasper, G.. 1983. Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In Faerch, C. and Kasper, G. (eds.) Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman. 20–60.Google Scholar
Faerch, C. and Kasper, G.. 1985. Procedural knowledge as a component of foreign language learners' communicative competence. In Bolte, H. and Herrlitz, W. (eds.) Kommunikation im Sprachunterricht. [Communication in language teaching.] Utrecht (Netherlands): Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht. 169–199.Google Scholar
Faerch, C. and Kasper, G.. 1986. cognitive dimensions of language transfer. In Kellerman, E. and Smith, M. Sharwood (eds.) Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquistion. New York: Pergamon. 49–65.Google Scholar
Faerch, C. and Kasper, G.. 1987. Perspectives on language transfer. Applied linguistics. 8. 2. 111–136.Google Scholar
Giacomi, A. and de Hérédia, C.. 1986. Réussites et échecs dans la communication linguistiqu entre locuteurs francophones et locuteurs immigrés. [Success and failure in linguistic communication between francophone and immigrant speakers.] Languages. 84. 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, K. 1986. Review of S. Krashen. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. TESOL quarterly. 20. 1. 116–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, E., Bongaerts, T., and Poulisse, N.. 1987. Strategy and system in L2 referential communication In Ellis, R. (ed.) Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 100–112.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. 1982 [1987]. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. [Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.]Google Scholar
Krashen, S. 1985. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Labarca, A. and Khanji, R.. 1986. On communication strategies: Focus on interaction. Studies in second language acquisition. 8. 1. 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H. 1987. Contextually defined queries: Evidence for variation in orientations to second language acquisition processes? In Pfaff, C. (ed.) First and second language acquisition processes. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House 117–142.Google Scholar
Odlin, T. 1986. On the nature and use of explicit knowledge. International review of applied linguistics. 24. 2. 123–144.Google Scholar
Olynyk, M., d'Anglejan, A., and Sankoff, D.. 1987. A quantitative and qualitative analysis of speech markers in the native and second language speech of bilinguals. Applied psycholinguistics. 8. 2. 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J., Chamot, A., and Walker, C.. 1987. Some application of cognitive theory to second language acquistion. Studies in second language acquisition. 9. 3. 287–306.Google Scholar
Paribakht, T. 1985. Strategic competence and language proficiency. Applied linguistics. 6. 2. 132–146.Google Scholar
Porter, P. 1986. How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centerd discussion. In Day, R. (ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 200–222.Google Scholar
Poulisse, N., Bongaerts, T., and Kellerman, E.. 1987. The use of retrospective verbal reports in the analysis compensatory strategies. In Faerch, C. and Kasper, G. (eds.) Introspection in second language reserach. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters. 213–229.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 1987. Stylistic variability and not speaking ‘normal’ English: Some post-Labovian approaches and their implications for the study of interlanguage. In Ellis, R. (ed.) Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 47–58.Google Scholar
Raupach, M. 1987b. Production strategies in L2 performance. In Dechert, H. and Raupach, M. (eds.) Psycholinguistic models of production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 91–96.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. 1987. Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In Wenden, A. and Rubin, J. (eds.) Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 15–30.Google Scholar
Sato, C. 1985. Task variation in interlanguage phonology. In Gass, S. and Madden, C. (eds.) Input in second language acquisition. Rowely, MA: Newbury House. 181–196.Google Scholar
Scarcella, R. and Perkins, L.. 1987. Shifiting gears: Krashen's input hypothesis. Studies in second language acquisition. 9. 3. 347–353.Google Scholar
Schachter, J. 1986. In search of systematicity in interlanguage production. Studies in second language acquisition. 8. 2. 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. and Frota, S.. 1986. Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of adult learner of Portuguese. In Day, R. (ed.) Talking to learn: conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 237–326.Google Scholar
Scholfield, P. 1987. Communication strategies—the researcher outmanoeuvred? Applied linguistics. 8. 3. 219–232.Google Scholar
Smith, M. Sharwood 1986. The competence/control model, crosslinguistic influence and the creation of new grammars. In Kellerman, E. and Smith, M. Sharwood (eds.) Crosslinguistic influence is second language acquistion. New York: Pergamon. 10–20.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. 1987. Variability and language testing. In Ellis, R. (ed.) Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 195–206.Google Scholar
Snow, C. 1987. Beyond conversation: Second language learners' acquisition of description and explanation. In Lantolf, J. and Labarca, A. (eds.) Research in second language learning: Focus on the classroom. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 3–16. [Delaware Symposium on Language Studies 6.]Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 1985. Metalinguistic knowledge and language use in acquisition-poor environments. Applied linguistics. 6. 3. 239–254.Google Scholar
Swain, M. 1986. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input comprehensible output in its development. In Cummins, J. and Swain, M.Billingualism in education: Aspects of theory, research and practice. LondonLongaman. 116–137.Google Scholar
Swan, M. 1987. Non-systematic variability: A self-inflicted conundrum? In Ellis, R. (eds.) Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 59–72.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. 1985. Variability interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language learning. 35. 3. 373–403.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. 1988. The Meaning and use of the term “competence” in linguistics and applied linguistics. Applied linguistics. 9. 2. 148–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinert, R. 1987. Processes in classroom second language development: The acquisition of negation in German. In Eills, R. (ed.) Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 83–99.Google Scholar
Wenden, A. 1987. Conceptual background and utility. In Wenden, A. and Rubin, J. (eds.) Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 3–13.Google Scholar
Young, R. 1987. Ends and means: Methods for the study of interlanguage variation. Paper presented at a symposium: Variation and Second Language Acquisition. Ann Arbor, MI. 10.Google Scholar