Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:35:32.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyzing Language Policy and Social Identification Across Heterogeneous Scales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2015

Katherine S. Mortimer  and
Stanton Wortham
Katherine S. Mortimer
Affiliation:
University of Texas at El [email protected]
Stanton Wortham
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Attempts to improve education often change how language is used in schools. Many such efforts aim to include minoritized students by more fully including their languages. These are often met with resistance not so much about language but more about identity. Thus processes of social identification are implicated in efforts to change language in education. If we are to understand how identity and language policy interconnect, we must analyze how stability and change are produced in each. This requires attention to macro-level patterns and to micro-level practices. But a two-scale account—micro instantiation of macro categories and micro changes shaping macro structures—does not adequately explain identity and language policy. This article focuses on educational language policy implementation, how language use and social identification change in an evolving policy context. We argue that change and stability in language policy implementation must be explained with reference to heterogeneous resources from multiple timescales—beyond micro and macro—as these resources establish and change social identities. We review recent research using multiple timescales to understand social processes like identification and policy implementation, and we illustrate the use of such a scalar account to describe the social identification of one student in a sixth grade classroom in Paraguay in the midst of a major national educational language policy change. We show how a person's identification as a new kind of minority language speaker involved heterogeneous resources from various spatiotemporal scales. We argue that analysis of the heterogeneous resources involved in social identification is essential to understanding the role that these processes play in cultural, pedagogical, and language change.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 35 , March 2015 , pp. 160 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

In this volume, Blommaert describes and illustrates concepts useful to the understanding of sociocultural practices at multiple scales. Building on earlier work, he articulates a theory of sociolinguistic scales, or hierarchically ordered spatiotemporal scales, and shows how various sociolinguistic resources such as accents, hybrid varieties, and “bits of language” are indexically linked to higher or lower scales and how their deployment in interaction comes to produce power in interaction.

Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practices: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York: Routledge.

In conversation with Blommaert (2010) and others, Canagarajah lays out in this volume a theory of language use that draws on both historical practices of multilingual communities and multilingual practices of contemporary highly mobile communities. He argues for a view of language use as a repertoire of heterogenous practices, and he highlights the always-negotiated nature of indexical relationships between these practices and scales of higher and lower power or value. Canagarajah's emphasis on contingency and negotiation of indexicality is important for understanding how scales come to be relevant in social identification.

Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8, 139–159.

This article offers a clear articulation of how ethnographic methods are employed in the study of language policy to make connections between macro and micro levels of language policy activity. As a heuristic for guiding ethnographic work on language policy, Johnson suggests that such studies should account for the agents, goals, processes, discourses, and sociohistorical contexts of policy.

Wortham, S. (2012). Beyond macro and micro in the linguistic anthropology of education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 43, 128–137.

The introduction to a special issue, this article summarizes developments in linguistic anthropology and educational research leading up to a call for more complex accounts of social identification than those that rely on macro and micro levels alone. Articles in the issue itself provide further illustrations of such accounts.

REFERENCES

Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agha, A., & Wortham, S. (eds.). (2005). Discourse across speech-events: Intertextuality and interdiscursivity in social life [Special issue]. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15 (1).Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2007). Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2 (2), 116–130.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Canese Caballero, V. (2008). When policy becomes practice: Teachers’ perspectives on official bilingualism and the teaching of Guarani as a second language in Paraguay (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Collins, J. (2012). Migration, sociolinguistic scale, and educational reproduction. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 43 (2), 192–213.Google Scholar
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Literacy and life in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, J. H. (2000). The racializing function of language panics. In Dueñas González, R. & Melis, I. (eds.), Language ideologies: Critical perspectives on the official English movement, Vol. 2 (pp. 245–267). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2001). History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41 (3), 509–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hult, F. M. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 202, 7–24.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8, 139–159. doi:10.1007/s10993–009–9136–9Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7 (4), 273–290.Google Scholar
Levinson, B. A. U., & Sutton, M. (2001). Introduction: Policy as/in practice—A sociocultural approach to the study of educational policy. In Sutton, M. & Levinson, B. A. U. (eds.), Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy (pp. 1–22). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Levinson, B. A. U., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy 23, 767–795.Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L. (ed.). (2011). Ethnography and language policy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L., & Warhol, L. (2011). The anthropology of language planning and policy. In Levinson, B. A. U. & Pollack, M. (eds.), A companion to the anthropology of education (pp. 177–196). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mortimer, K. S. (2012). The Guarani speaker in Paraguayan bilingual education policy: Language policy as metapragmatic discourse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Mortimer, K. S. (2013). Communicative event chains in an ethnography of Paraguayan language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 219, 67–99.Google Scholar
Mortimer, K. S. (2014). Re-scaling mixed language in a Paraguayan school: Toward more heteroglossic language policy. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 20, Jyväskylä, Finland, June 2014.Google Scholar
Mortimer, K. S. (2015). Producing change and stability: A scalar analysis of Paraguayan bilingual education policy implementation. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Nickson, R. A. (2009). Governance and the revitalization of the Guaraní language in Paraguay. Latin American Research Review, 44 (3), 3–26.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, P. (n.d.). Miedo a ser distinto: Reflexiones sobre la actitud de desconfianza y de odio hacia el otro que generan discriminación y hasta persecución. Conversaciones con Eduardo Galeano. Revista Noticias. Retrieved from http://www.revista-noticias.com.ar/comun/nota.php?art=1223&ed=1753.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. (eds.). (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paraguay. (1992). Constitución de la República del Paraguay. Asunción, Paraguay: Gabinete Civil de la Presidencia.Google Scholar
Paraguay, DGEEC. (2002). Censo 2002. Asunción, Paraguay: Dirección General de Estadística, Encuestas y Censos.Google Scholar
Paulston, C. B. (1976). Pronouns of address in Swedish: Social class semantics and a changing system. Language in Society, 5, 359–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, S. U. (1983). The invisible culture: Communication in classroom and community on the Warm Springs Indian Reservation. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B., & Ochs, E. (eds.). (1986). Language socialization across cultures. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1997). Policy: A new field of anthropology. In Shore, C. & Wright, S. (eds.), Anthropology of policy: Critical perspectives on governance and power (pp. 3–39). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1992). The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough? In DiLuzio, A. & Auer, P. (eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 55–75). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Lucy, J. A. (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics (pp. 33–58). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., & Urban, G. (1996). The natural history of discourse. In Silverstein, M. & Urban, G. (eds.), Natural histories of discourse (pp. 1–17). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, M., & Levinson, B. A. U. (eds.). (2001). Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Urban, G. (1996). Entextualization, replication, and power. In Silverstein, M. & Urban, G. (eds.), Natural histories of discourse (pp. 21–44). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. (2005). Socialization beyond the speech event. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15 (1), 95–112.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identity and academic learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. (2012). Beyond macro and micro in the linguistic anthropology of education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 43 (2), 128–137.Google Scholar
Wortham, S., & Rhodes, C. (2012). The production of relevant scales: Social identification of migrants during rapid demographic change in one American town. Applied Linguistics Review, 3 (1), 75–99.Google Scholar
Wortham, S., & Rhodes, C. (2013). Life as a chord: Heterogeneous resources in the social identification of one migrant girl. Applied Linguistics, 34 (5), 536–553.Google Scholar
Zajícová, L. (2009). El bilingüismo paraguayo: Usos y actitudes hacia el guaraní y el castellano. Madrid, Spain: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar