Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:48:58.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of different levels of crude glycerol on the morphology and some pathogenic bacteria of the small intestine in male broilers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2013

M. Ozdogan ,
E. Topal ,
E. Pinar Paksuz  and
S. Kirkan
M. Ozdogan*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Adnan Menderes University, South Campus, 09100 Aydin, Turkey
E. Topal
Affiliation:
Turkish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, I·zmir, Turkey
E. Pinar Paksuz
Affiliation:
Department of Elementary Teaching, Faculty of Education, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
S. Kirkan
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Adnan Menderes University, Işikli, Aydin, Turkey
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The gut health of poultry is closely associated with feeds and feeding. The experiment was conducted to the effect of crude glycerol addition to diets of male broilers on the bacterial microflora and morphology of their small intestines (duodenum, jejunum and ileum). A total of 120 Ross 308 broiler chicks received diets containing 0% (GLY 0), 4% (GLY 4) or 8% (GLY 8) crude glycerol for 42 days. The presence of Coliform bacteria and Enterobacteria was reduced in the duodenal tract of the broilers of GLY 4 (P<0.001); however, the presence of Staphylococci/Micrococci in the GLY 8 was reduced relative to the other groups (P<0.001). The presence of Salmonella spp. decreased in conjunction with the increasing quantities of glycerol (P<0.001). Analysis of the data regarding gut morphology (epithelial cell thickness, villi length and width, and crypt length and width) indicated that the glycerol levels fed to the different groups of broilers represented statistically different results in the small intestine. In general, whereas the diet with 4% glycerol statistically affected the investigated parameters of the gut, the diet with 8% glycerol statistically affected some segments of the broiler intestines.

Keywords

glycerolbroilersbacterial microfloravillicrypt
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 36 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous 1989. The processed animal protein order. HMSO, London. United Kingdom Statuary Instrument No. 661.Google Scholar
Apajalahti, J, Kettunen, A and Graham, H 2004. Characteristics of the gastrointestinal microbial communities, with special reference to the chicken. World’s Poultry Science Journal 60, 223–232.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1997. Official methods of analysis (AOAC). Association of official analytical chemists, 16th edition. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
Caspary, WF 1992. Physiology and pathophysiology of intestinal absorption. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 55, 299–308.Google Scholar
Chambers, JR and Gong, J 2011. The intestinal microbiota and its modulation for Salmonella control in chickens. Food Research International 44, 3149–3159.Google Scholar
Cloak, OM, Duffy, G, Sheridan, JJ, Mcdowell, DA and Blair, IS 1999. Development of a surface adhesion immunofluorescent technique for the rapid detection of Salmonella sp. from meat and poultry. Journal of Applied Microbiology 86, 583–590.Google Scholar
Da Silva, GP, Mack, M and Contiero, J 2009. Glycerol: a promising and abundant carbon source for industrial microbiology. Biotechnology Advances 27, 30–39.Google Scholar
Dale, N and Batal, A 2003. Ingredient analysis table: 2003–2004 edition. Feedstuffs 75, 16–17.Google Scholar
Dasari, M. 2007. Crude glycerol potential described. Feedstuffs 79, 1–3.Google Scholar
De Smedt, JM, Chartron, S, Cordier, JL, Graff, E, Hoekstra, H, Lecoupeau, JP, Lindblom, M, Milas, J, Morgan, RM, Nowacki, R, O’donoghue, D, Van Gestel, G and Varmedal, M 1991. Collaborative study of the International Office of Cocoa, Chocolate and Sugar Confectionery and Salmonella detection from cocoa and chocolate processing environmental samples. International Journal of Food Microbiology 13, 301–308.Google Scholar
De Zutter, L, De Smedt, JM, Abrams, R, Beckers, V, Catteau, M, De Borchgrave, J, Debevere, J, Hoekstra, J, Jonkers, F, Lenges, J, Notermans, S, Van Damme, L, Vandermeersch, R, Verbraeken, R and Waes, G 1991. Collaborative study on the use of motility enrichment on modified semi-solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for the detection of Salmonella from foods. International Journal of Food Microbiology 13, 11–20.Google Scholar
Dibner, JJ, Kitchell, ML, Atwell, CA and Ivey, FJ 1996. The effects of dietary ingredients and age on the microscopic structure of the gastrointestinal tract in poultry. Journal of Applied Poultry Resesearch 5, 70–77.Google Scholar
Galfi, P and Bokori, J 1990. Feeding trial in pigs with a diet containing sodium n-butyrate. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 38, 3–17.Google Scholar
García, P, Gregori, PC, Hernández, F, Megías, MD and Madrid, J 2007. Effect of formic acid and plant extracts on growth, nutrient digestibility, intestine mucosa morphology, and meat yield of broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16, 555–562.Google Scholar
Habe, H, Konishi, M, Ikegami, T, Sakaki, K and Kitamoto, D 2007. Microbial conversion of glycerol to promising chemicals. SIM Annual Meeting and Exhibition, Denver, 29 July–2 August 2007, Denver, USA, p. 22.Google Scholar
Jamroz, D, Wertelecki, T, Houszka, M and Kamel, C 2006. Influence of diet type on the inclusion of plant origin active substances on morphological and histochemical characteristics of the stomach and jejunum walls in chicken. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 90, 255–268.Google Scholar
Knarreborg, A, Jensen, SK and Engberg, RM 2003. Pancreatic lipase activity as influenced by unconjugated bile acids and pH, measured in vitro and in vivo . The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 14, 259–265.Google Scholar
Krebs, HA and Lund, P 1966. Formation of glucose from hexoses, pentoses, polyols and related substances in kidney cortex. Biochemistry Journal 98, 210–214.Google Scholar
Kristy, NK, Kelly, S, Swanson, KA, Tappenden, LBS and George, CFJ 2005. Diet and age affect intestinal morphology and large bowel fermentative end-product concentrations in senior and young adult dogs. The Journal of Nutrition 135, 1940–1945.Google Scholar
Lan, Y, Verstegen, MWA, Tamminga, S and Williams, BA 2005. The role of the commensal gut microbial community in broiler chickens. World's Poultry Science Journal 61, 95–104.Google Scholar
Langhout, DJ, Schutte, JB, Van Leeuwen, P, Wiebenga, J and Tamminga, S 1999. Effect of dietary high and low methylated citrus pectin on the activity of the ileal microflora and morphology of the small intestinal wall of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 40, 340–347.Google Scholar
Lin, ECC 1977. Glycerol utilization and its regulation in mammals. Annual Review Biochemistry 46, 765–795.Google Scholar
Losada, AM and Olleros, T 2002. Towards a healthier diet for the colon: the influence of fructooligosaccharides and lactobacilli on intestinal health. Nutrition Research 22, 71–84.Google Scholar
Min, YN, Yan, F, Liu, FZ, Coto, C and Waldroup, PW 2010. Glycerin-A new energy source for poultry. International Journal of Poultry Science 9, 1–4.Google Scholar
National Research Council 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th edition. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ni, Y, Zhong, X, Wang, H, Xu, L and Wei, S 2009. Effects of microbial agents on small intestinal structure and the quantity of cecal microorganisms in broilers. Frontiers of Agriculture in China 3, 84–88.Google Scholar
Patterson, JA and Burkholder, KM 2003. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science 82, 627–631.Google Scholar
Ross, RP, Mills, S, Hill, C, Fitzgerald, GF and Stanton, C 2010. Specific metabolite production by gut microbiota as a basis for probiotic function. International Dairy Journal 20, 269–276.Google Scholar
SAS 1999. SAS User’s Guide. Statistics. Version 9.1 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Shamoto, K and Yamauchi, K 2000. Recovery responses of chick intestinal villus morphology to different refeeding procedures. Poultry Science 79, 718–723.Google Scholar
Shamoto, K, Yamauchi, K and Kamisoyama, H 1999. Morphological alterations of the duodenal villi in chicks refed rice bran or grower mash after fasting. The Journal of Poultry Science 36, 38–46.Google Scholar
Teirlynck, E, Bjerrum, L, Eeckhaut, V, Huygebaert, G, Pasmans, F, Haesebrouck, F, Dewulf, J, Ducatelle, R and Immerseel, FV 2009. The cereal type in feed influences gut wall morphology and intestinal immune cell infiltration in broiler chickens. British Journal of Nutrition 102, 1453–1461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teo, AY and Tan, HM 2007. Evaluation of the performance and intestinal gut microflora of broilers fed on corn-soy diets supplemented with Bacillus subtilis PB6 (CloSTAT). The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16, 296–303.Google Scholar
Visek, WJ 1978. The mode of growth promotion by antibiotics. Journal of Animal Science 46, 1447–1469.Google Scholar
Yamauchi, K and Tarachai, P 2000. Changes in intestinal villi, cell area and intracellular autophagic vacuoles related to intestinal function in chickens. British Poultry Science 41, 416–423.Google Scholar
Yamauchi, K, Kamisoyama, H and Isshiki, Y 1996. Effects of fasting and refeeding on structures of the intestinal villi and epithelial cell in White Leghorn hens. British Poultry Science 37, 909–921.Google Scholar
Yasar, S and Forbes, JM 1999. Performance and gastro-intestinal response of broiler chicks fed on cereal grain-based foods soaked in water. British Poultry Science 40, 65–76.Google Scholar