Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:14:24.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Contentious Politics

The Evolution of Authoritarianism and Contentious Action in Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2024

Bogdan Mamaev
Bogdan Mamaev
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland

Summary

This Element examines the evolution of authoritarianism in Russia from 2011 to 2023, focusing on its impact on contentious action. It argues that the primary determinant of contention, at both federal and regional levels, is authoritarian innovation characterized by reactive and proactive repression. Drawing on Russian legislation, reports from human rights organizations, media coverage, and a novel dataset of contentious events created from user-generated reports on Twitter using computational techniques, this Element contributes to the understanding of contentious politics in authoritarian regimes, underscoring the role of authoritarianism and its innovative responses in shaping contentious action.
Get access

Keywords

authoritarianismcontentious politicsrepressionprotestRussia
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Contentious Politics
Online ISBN: 9781009560672
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 20 June 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, F. B. (2020). Non-state authoritarianism and diaspora politics. Global Networks, 20(1), 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexanyan, K., Barash, V., Etling, B., et al. (2012). Exploring Russian cyberspace: Digitally-mediated collective action and the networked public sphere. Berkman Center Research Publication, (2).Google Scholar
Alieva, I., Moffitt, J., & Carley, K. M. (2022). How disinformation operations against Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny influence the international audience on Twitter. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 12(1), 80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almeida, P. (2003). Opportunity organizations and threat-induced contention: Protest waves in authoritarian settings. American Journal of Sociology, 109(2), 345–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., Limongi, F., & Przeworski, A. (1996). Classifying political regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 31, 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International. (2012). The circle of injustice: Security operations and human rights violations in Ingushetia (Tech. Rep.). www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur46/005/2012/en/Google Scholar
Anckar, C., & Fredriksson, C. (2019). Classifying political regimes 1800–2016: A typology and a new dataset. European Political Science, 18(1), 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arslanalp, M., & Erkmen, T. D. (2020). Mobile emergency rule in Turkey: Legal repression of protests during authoritarian transformation. Democratization, 27(6), 947–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, K. (2015). The election trap: The cycle of post-electoral repression and opposition fragmentation in Lukashenko’s Belarus. Democratization, 22(6), 1030–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azhgikhina, N. (2007). The struggle for press freedom in Russia: Reflections of a Russian journalist. Europe-Asia Studies, 59(8), 1245–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, M., Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., & Sonin, K. (2014). Fraud and elections in authoritarian regimes: Evidence from a field experiment in Russia. American Political Science Review, 108(1), 144–158.Google Scholar
BBC News. (2016, November 1). Russia activist Ildar Dadin accuses prison of torture. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37836739Google Scholar
Biggs, M. (2015). Has protest increased since the 1970s? How a survey question can construct a spurious trend. British Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 141–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biggs, M. (2018). Size matters: Quantifying protest by counting participants. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(3), 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørnskov, C., & Rode, M. (2019). Regime types and regime change: A new dataset on democracy, coups, and political institutions. The Review of International Organizations, 15(2), 531–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørnskov, C., & Rode, M. (2020). Regime types and regime change: A new dataset on democracy, coups, and political institutions. The Review of International Organizations, 15, 531–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodrunova, S. S., Litvinenko, A., & Nigmatullina, K. (2021). Who is the censor? Self-censorship of Russian journalists in professional routines and social networking. Journalism, 22(12), 2919–2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, K. M. (2022). ‘The only thing is you have to know them first’: Protest policing and Malaysia’s BERSIH protests (2011–2016). Small Wars & Insurgencies, 33(4–5), 868–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutros, M. (2017). Place and tactical innovation in social movements: The emergence of Egypt’s anti-harassment groups. Theory and Society, 46, 543–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, A., Landman, T., & Farquhar, D. (2015). Social media and protest mobilization: Evidence from the Tunisian revolution. Democratization, 22(4), 764–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buitinck, L., Louppe, G., Blondel, M., et al. (2013). API design for machine learning software: Experiences from the scikit-learn project. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.0238.Google Scholar
Burtsev, M., Seliverstov, A., Airapetyan, R., et al. (2018). Deeppavlov: Open-source library for dialogue systems. In Proceedings of ACL 2018, system demonstrations (pp. 122–127).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carles, B., Miller, M., & Sebastian, R. (2018). Boix-miller-rosato dichotomous coding of democracy, 1800–2015. Harvard Dataverse.Google Scholar
Centre, M. H. R. (2013). The case of Gelendghik human rights activists. https://memohrc.org/ru/special-projects/delo-gelendzhikskih-pravozashchitnikovGoogle Scholar
Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media (Vol. 4, pp. 10–17).Google Scholar
Chaisty, P., & Whitefield, S. (2013). Forward to democracy or back to authoritarianism? The attitudinal bases of mass support for the Russian election protests of 2011–2012. Post-Soviet Affairs, 29(5), 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chau, T.- H., & Wan, K.- M. (2024). Pour (tear) gas on fire? Violent confrontations and anti-government backlash. Political Science Research and Methods, 12(1), 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., & Moss, D. M. (2018). Authoritarian regimes and social movements. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., Kriesi, H., & McCammon, H. J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 666–681). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheskin, A., & March, L. (2015). State-society relations in contemporary Russia: New forms of political and social contention. East European Politics, 31(3), 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M., Lindberg, S., Skaaning, S. E., & Teorell, J. (2016). Measuring high-level democratic principles using the v-dem data. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 580–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corduneanu-Huci, C., & Osa, M. (2003). Running uphill: Political opportunity in non-democracies. Comparative Sociology, 2(4), 605–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, N. (2002). Repertoires of contention and tactical diversity in the UK psychiatric survivors movement: The question of appropriation. Social Movement Studies, 1(1), 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curato, N., & Fossati, D. (2020). Authoritarian innovations: Crafting support for a less democratic Southeast Asia. Democratization, 27(6), 1006–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daucé, F. (2014). The government and human rights groups in Russia: Civilized oppression? Journal of Civil Society, 10(3), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, C. (1995). Multi-dimensional threat perception and state repression: An inquiry into why states apply negative sanctions. American Journal of Political Science, 683–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehghan, E., & Glazunova, S. (2021). “Fake news” discourses: An exploration of Russian and Persian tweets. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(5), 741–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Porta, D. (2011). Eventful protest, global conflicts. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. 9(2), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, J., Chang, M.- W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.Google Scholar
Dollbaum, J. M. (2021a). Protest event analysis under conditions of limited press freedom: Comparing data sources. Media and Communication, 9(4), 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollbaum, J. M. (2021b). Social policy on social media: How opposition actors used Twitter and VKontakte to oppose the Russian pension reform. Problems of Post-Communism, 68(6), 509–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, J. (2003). Tanks, tear gas, and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, J. (2011). Political repression: Iron fists, velvet gloves, and diffuse control. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, G. (2016). In Crossley, N. & Krinsky, J. (Eds.), Social networks and social movements (pp. 48–69). Routledge.Google Scholar
Eisinger, P. K. (1973). The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. American Political Science Review. 67(1), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enikolopov, R., Korovkin, V., Petrova, M., Sonin, K., & Zakharov, A. V. (2012). Field experiment estimate of electoral fraud in Russian parliamentary elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.Google ScholarPubMed
Esen, B., & Gumuscu, S. (2016). Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 37(9), 1581–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (2004). Federal Law of June 19, 2004 No. 54,FZ.Google Scholar
Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (2022). Article 20.2 of Code of Administrative Offences [Government Document].Google Scholar
Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (2023a). Administrative Code of the Russian Federation.Google Scholar
Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (2023b). Article 20.2 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation.Google Scholar
Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (2023c). Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.Google Scholar
Federal Protective Service of the Russian Federation. (2023). Official internet portal of legal information. http://pravo.gov.ru/Google Scholar
FIDH. (2018). Russia 2012–2018: 50 anti-democracy laws entered into force within last presidential mandate. www.fidh.org/en/region/europe-central-asia/russia/russia-2012-2018-50-anti-democracy-laws-entered-into-force-withinGoogle Scholar
FIDH. (2023). FIDH documents the destruction of civil society in Russia, law after law. www.fidh.org/en/region/europe-central-asia/russia/fidh-documents-the-destruction-of-civil-society-in-russia-law-afterGoogle Scholar
Ford, M., Gillan, M., & Ward, K. (2021). Authoritarian innovations in labor governance: The case of Cambodia. Governance, 34(4), 1255–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. (2023). Marking 50 years in the struggle for democracy (Report). Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2023/marking-50-yearsGoogle Scholar
Gabdulhakov, R. (2020). (Con)trolling the web: Social media user arrests, state-supported vigilantism and citizen counter-forces in Russia. Global Crime, 21(3–4), 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabowitsch, M. (2018). Are copycats subversive? Strategy-31, the Russian runs, the immortal regiment, and the transformative potential of non-hierarchical movements. Problems of Post-Communism, 65(5), 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galeotti, M. (2021). The silovik-industrial complex: Russia’s national guard as coercive, political, economic and cultural force. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 29(1), 3–29.Google Scholar
Gandhi, J., & Przeworski, A. (2007). Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies, 40(11), 1279–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gel’man, V. (2016). The politics of fear: How Russia’s rulers counter their rivals. Russian Politics, 1(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasius, M. (2018). What authoritarianism is … and is not: A practice perspective. International Affairs, 94(3), 515–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Göbel, C. (2021). The political logic of protest repression in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(128), 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, J. (2016). Protest and repression in democracies and autocracies: Europe, Iran, Thailand and the Middle East 2010–11. In Seferiades, S. & Johnston, H. (Eds.), Violent protest, contentious politics, and the neoliberal state (p. 103–117). Routledge.Google Scholar
Goldstone, J., & Tilly, C. (2001). Threat (and opportunity): Popular action and state response in the dynamics of contentious action. Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grießhaber, D., Maucher, J., & Vu, N. T. (2020). Fine-tuning BERT for low-resource natural language understanding via active learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.02462.Google Scholar
Grimm, J., & Harders, C. (2018). Unpacking the effects of repression: The evolution of Islamist repertoires of contention in Egypt after the fall of president Morsi. Social Movement Studies, 17(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, D. K., Singh, H., & Sprague, T. (1993). Government coercion of dissidents: Deterrence or provocation? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37(2), 301–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guriev, S., & Treisman, D. (2020). A theory of informational autocracy. Journal of Public Economics, 186, 104158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S. G., & Ambrosio, T. (2017). Authoritarian learning: A conceptual overview. East European Politics, 33(2), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassanpour, N. (2014). Media disruption and revolutionary unrest: Evidence from Mubarak’s quasi-experiment. Political Communication, 31(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellmeier, S., & Weidmann, N. B. (2020). Pulling the strings? The strategic use of pro-government mobilization in authoritarian regimes. Comparative Political Studies, 53(1), 71–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydemann, S. (2013). Tracking the Arab Spring: Syria and the future of authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 24(4), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydemann, S., & Leenders, R. (2011). Authoritarian learning and authoritarian resilience: Regime responses to the “Arab Awakening.” Globalizations, 8(5), 647–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydemann, S., & Leenders, R. (2014). Authoritarian learning and counterrevolution. In Lynch, M. (ed.), The Arab uprisings explained: New contentious politics in the middle east (pp. 75–92). Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, R. (2011). Putin’s “preventive counter-revolution”: Post-soviet authoritarianism and the spectre of velvet revolution. Europe-Asia Studies, 63(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. (2008). World report 2008: Russia. www.hrw.org/world-report/2008/country-chapters-6Google Scholar
Jay Chen, C.- J. (2020). A protest society evaluated: Popular protests in China, 2000–2019. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 25(SI), 641–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judicial Department of the Supreme Court. (2023). Report on the work of courts of general jurisdiction in considering cases of administrative offences. www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=3417.Google Scholar
Khovalyg, D. (2023). On “New Tuva” anti-war movement. Inner Asia, 25(1), 118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H., Hutter, S., & Bojar, A. (2019). Contentious episode analysis. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 24(3), 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuratov, Y., & Arkhipov, M. (2019). Adaptation of deep bidirectional multilingual transformers for Russian Language. Computing Research Repository. http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07213.Google Scholar
Lang, B. (2018). Authoritarian learning in china’s civil society regulations: Towards a multi-level framework. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 47(3), 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankina, T. (2015). The dynamics of regional and national contentious politics in Russia: Evidence from a new dataset. Problems of Post-Communism, 62(1), 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPorte, J. (2015). Hidden in plain sight: Political opposition and hegemonic authoritarianism in Azerbaijan. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(4), 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2002). Elections without democracy: The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libman, A. (2017). Subnational political regimes and formal economic regulation: Evidence from Russian regions. Regional & Federal Studies, 27(2), 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, M. I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation?: The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(2), 266–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipman, M. (2010). Freedom of expression without freedom of the press. Journal of International Affairs, 63(2), 153–169.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1968). Protest as a political resources. American Political Science Review, 62(4), 1144–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loshchilov, I., & Hutter, F. (2017). Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101.Google Scholar
Loveman, M. (1998). High-risk collective action: Defending human rights in Chile, Uruguay, and Argentina. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 477–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lührmann, A., Tannenberg, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2018). Regimes of the world (row): Opening new avenues for the comparative study of political regimes. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddi, S. R., Harvey, R. H., Khoshaba, D. M., et al. (2006). The personality construct of hardiness, iii: Relationships with repression, innovativeness, authoritarianism, and performance. Journal of Personality, 74(2), 575–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magaloni, B., Chu, J., & Min, E. (2013). Autocracies of the world, 1950–2012 (version 1.0). Dataset, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Mapes, N., White, A., Medury, R., & Dua, S. (2019). Divisive language and propaganda detection using multi-head attention transformers with deep learning BERT-based language models for binary classification. In Proceedings of the second workshop on natural language processing for internet freedom: Censorship, disinformation, and propaganda (p. 103–106).Google Scholar
Marshall, M. G., Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (2010). Polity iv project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2010. Center for Systemic Peace, 10, 24–37.Google Scholar
Marty, D. (2009). Situation in the North Caucasus region: security and human rights (Tech. Rep.). Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. http://assembly.coe.int/CommitteeDocs/2009/ajdoc43_2009.pdfGoogle Scholar
McAdam, D. (1983). Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 735–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2018). The political context of social movements. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., Kriesi, H., & McCammon, H. J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 17–42). John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2012). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, L. A., Rice, D., & Lokhmutov, A. (2023). Four months of “discrediting the military”: Repressive law in wartime Russia. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 31(2), 125–160.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mietzner, M. (2020). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: Electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, W. H. (1998). Repression and dissent: Substitution, context, and timing. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 851–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenbesser, L. (2020a). The menu of autocratic innovation. Democratization, 27(6), 1053–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenbesser, L. (2020b). The rise of sophisticated authoritarianism in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, A. D. (1984). The origins of the civil rights movement. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Moss, D. (2014). Repression, response, and contained escalation under “liberalized” authoritarianism in Jordan. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 19(3), 261–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy - evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5–34.Google Scholar
Mustafa, B. (2023). Post-tishreen online feminism: Continuity, rupture, departure. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 55(2), 328–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, M. (2020). Towards a Russia of the regions. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norén-Nilsson, A. (2021). Fresh news, innovative news: Popularizing Cambodia’s authoritarian turn. Critical Asian Studies, 53(1), 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaya, Gazeta. (2021). The Ingush case of Russia. Novaya Gazeta. https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2021/05/13/ingushskoe-delo-rossiiGoogle Scholar
Omelicheva, M. Y. (2021). Repression trap: The mechanism of escalating state violence in Russia (Tech. Rep.). Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).Google Scholar
Ong, L. H., & Han, D. (2019). What drives people to protest in an authoritarian country? Resources and rewards vs risks of protests in urban and rural China. Political Studies, 67(1), 224–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opp, K. (2022). Advanced introduction to social movements and political protests. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Opp, K.- D. (1994). Repression and revolutionary action: East Germany in 1989. Rationality and Society, 6(1), 101–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opp, K.- D. (2009). Theories of political protest and social movements: A multidisciplinary introduction, critique, and synthesis. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortmann, S. (2023). When protests become a threat to authoritarian rule: The case of environmental protests in Viet Nam. Third World Quarterly, 44(9), 2063–2079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortmann, S., & Thompson, M. R. (2020). China’s “Singapore model” and authoritarian learning. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osa, M., & Schock, K. (2007). A long, hard slog: Political opportunities, social networks and the mobilization of dissent in non-democracies. In Patrick, G. C. (Ed.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (Vol. 27, pp. 123–153). Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, OVD-Info. (2014). Political repressions in Russia in 2011–2014: Criminal prosecutions. https://reports.ovdinfo.org/2014/cr-report/Google Scholar
, OVD-Info. (2018, October 27). The “New Greatness” case: Who are these people, and why are they being tried? An OVD-Info guide. https://ovd.info/articles/2018/10/27/delo-novogo-velichiya-kto-eti-lyudi-i-za-chto-ih-sudyat-gid-ovd-infoGoogle Scholar
, OVD-Info. (2019, May 13). The “Network” case: Who are these people, and why are they being tried? An OVD-Info guide. https://ovd.info/articles/2019/05/13/delo-seti-kto-eti-lyudi-i-za-chto-ih-sudyat-gid-ovd-infoGoogle Scholar
, OVD-Info. (2023a, July 17). Database of politically motivated criminal prosecutions. https://data.ovd.info/politpressingGoogle Scholar
, OVD-Info. (2023b). 20.2 administrative offenses code: Application. https://data-scripts.ovd.info/20_2/Google Scholar
Pan, J. (2017). How market dynamics of domestic and foreign social media firms shape strategies of internet censorship. Problems of Post-Communism, 64(3–4), 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parliamentary Assembly. (2012, October 3). The definition of political prisoner. https://pace.coe.int/en/files/19150/htmlGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, T. (2020). Authoritarian innovations: Theoretical foundations and practical implications. Democratization, 27(6), 1092–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politkovskaya, A. (2012). Putin’s Russia: The definitive account of Putin’s rise to power. Random House.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., et al. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990 (No. 3). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084.Google Scholar
Riquelme, F., & González-Cantergiani, P. (2016). Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey. Information Processing & Management, 52(5), 949–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, E. H., & Conrad, C. R. (2016). Preventing and responding to dissent: The observational challenges of explaining strategic repression. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, G. (2013). Protesting Putinism. Problems of Post-Communism, 60(2), 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossman, E. (2022). Meet Russia’s feminist resistance to Putin’s war on Ukraine. Green Left Weekly, (1341), 13. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.393839445920891.Google Scholar
Roudakova, N. (2009). Journalism as “prostitution”: Understanding Russia’s reactions to Anna Politkovskaya’s murder. Political Communication, 26(4), 412–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouvinsky, R. (2021). Lawmaking in times of domestic and foreign-policy instability (the Russian experience). The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 9(1), 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainz, O., & Rigau, G. (2021). Ask2transformers: Zero-shot domain labelling with pre-trained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.02661.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. (2013). The politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schock, K. (1999). People power and political opportunities: Social movement mobilization and outcomes in the Philippines and Burma. Social Problems, 46(3), 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahi, A., & Abdoh-Tabrizi, E. (2020). Iran’s 2019–2020 demonstrations: The changing dynamics of political protests in Iran. Asian Affairs, 51(1), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shriver, T. E., & Adams, A. E. (2010). Cycles of repression and tactical innovation: The evolution of environmental dissidence in communist Czechoslovakia. The Sociological Quarterly, 51(2), 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, D. A. (2011). When does repression work? Collective action in social networks. The Journal of Politics, 73(4), 993–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaaning, S.- E. (2021). Lexical index of electoral democracy (LIED) dataset v6.0. Harvard Dataverse.Google Scholar
Smith, W. (2011). Europe to the rescue: The killing of journalists in Russia and the European Court of Human Rights. George Washington International Law Review, 43, 493.Google Scholar
Snow, D. A., Vliegenthart, R., & Ketelaars, P. (2018). The framing perspective on social movements. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., Kriesi, H., & McCammon, H. J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 392–410). John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, D. (1976). Theoretical and methodological problems in the analysis of governmental coercion and collective violence. Journal of Political & Military Sociology, 4(2), 277–293.Google Scholar
Sokirianskaia, E. (2005). Families and clans in Ingushetia and Chechnya: A fieldwork report. Central Asian Survey, 24(4), 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokirianskaia, E. (2023). Bonds of blood?: State-building and clanship in Chechnya and Ingushetia. Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Sova. (2022). About the centre Sova. www.sova-center.ru/about-us/Google Scholar
Center, SoVA. (2013). Illegal use of anti-extremism legislation in Russia in 2012. www.sova-center.ru/misuse/publications/2013/04/d26952/Google Scholar
Straughn, J. B. (2005). “Taking the state at its word”: The arts of consentful contention in the German Democratic Republic. American Journal of Sociology, 110(6), 1598–1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1993). Cycles of collective action: Between moments of madness and the repertoire of contention. Social Science History, 17(2), 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2022). Power in movement. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, S. G. (1989). Democracy and disorder: Protest and politics in Italy, 1965–1975. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, V., & Van Dyke, N. (2004). “Get up, stand up”: Tactical repertoires of social movements. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., Kriesi, H. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements, 262–293. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Tertytchnaya, K. (2023). “This rally is not authorized”: Preventive repression and public opinion in electoral autocracies. World Politics, 75(3), 482–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Guardian. (2014, December 30). Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny given suspended sentence but brother jailed. www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/30/kremlin-critic-navalny-given-suspended-sentence-brother-jailedGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C. (1993). Contentious repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Social Science History, 17(2), 253–280.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (2010). Regimes and repertoires. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trejo, G. (2012). Popular movements in autocracies: Religion, repression, and indigenous collective action in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenin, D., Arbatov, A., Lipman, M., et al. (2012). The Russian Awakening (Tech. Rep.). www.jstor.org/stable/resrep13012Google Scholar
Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2013). Cyber-protest and civil society: The internet and action repertoires in social movements. In Jewkes, Y. & Yar, M. (Eds.), Handbook of internet crime (pp. 230–254). Willan.Google Scholar
Van Stekelenburg, J., Klandermans, B., & Walgrave, S. (2018). Individual participation in street demonstrations. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., Kriesi, H. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 371. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Commission, Venice. (2013, June 18). Opinion on the issue of the prohibition of so-called “Propaganda of homosexuality” in the light of recent legislation in some Council of Europe Member States, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 95th Plenary Session (14–15 June 2013) (Tech. Rep.). Council of Europe. www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2013)022-eGoogle Scholar
Commission, Venice. (2021). Documents: Russia. www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?country=26&other=trueGoogle Scholar
Waller, J. M. (1993). Russia’s legal foundations for civil repression. Demokratizatsiya, 1(3), 111.Google Scholar
Wang, D. J., & Soule, S. A. (2016). Tactical innovation in social movements: The effects of peripheral and multi-issue protest. American Sociological Review, 81(3), 517–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolchik, S. L. (2012). Can there be a color revolution? Journal of Democracy, 23, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wongngamdee, P. (2023). Propagating and resisting authoritarian innovation online: Thailand’s ‘rotc cyber’activity. In Ockey, J. & Talib, N. S. (Eds.), Democratic recession, autocratization, and democratic backlash in southeast asia (pp. 139–165). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X. (2021). To repress or to co-opt? Authoritarian control in the age of digital surveillance. American Journal of Political Science, 65(2), 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Yabloko. (2021). Registry of repressive laws of Russia. www.yabloko.ru/cat-news/2021/09/16-1Google Scholar
Yaghi, M. (2018). Frame resonance, tactical innovation, and poor people in the Tunisian uprising. In Coy, P. G. (ed.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (Vol. 42, pp. 115–143). Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Yuen, S. (2023). The institutional foundation of countermobilization: Elites and pro-regime grassroots organizations in post-handover Hong Kong. Government and Opposition, 58(2), 316–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., & Pan, J. (2019). Casm: A deep-learning approach for identifying collective action events with text and image data from social media. Sociological Methodology, 49(1), 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Evolution of Authoritarianism and Contentious Action in Russia
  • Bogdan Mamaev, Griffith University, Queensland
  • Online ISBN: 9781009560672
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Evolution of Authoritarianism and Contentious Action in Russia
  • Bogdan Mamaev, Griffith University, Queensland
  • Online ISBN: 9781009560672
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Evolution of Authoritarianism and Contentious Action in Russia
  • Bogdan Mamaev, Griffith University, Queensland
  • Online ISBN: 9781009560672
Available formats
×