Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:15:05.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2024

Lando Kirchmair
Lando Kirchmair
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Rethinking the Relationship between International, EU and National Law
Consent-Based Monism
 , pp. 327 - 380
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abi-Saab, Georges, “The Newly Independent States and International Law: An Outline” (1962) 8 (2) Howard Law Journal 97–121.Google Scholar
Ackermann, Thomas E A, “Editorial Comments: Clear and Present Danger: Poland, the Rule of Law & Primacy” (2021) 58 (6) Common Market Law Review 1635–1648.Google Scholar
Akehurst, Michael, “Custom as a Source of International Law” (1974–1975) 47 British Yearbook of International Law 1–53.Google Scholar
Albert, Hans, Konstruktion und Kritik. Aufsätze zur Philosophie des kritischen Rationalismus (Hoffmann und Campe 2nd ed 1975).Google Scholar
Albert, Hans, Traktat über rationale Praxis (Mohr Siebeck 1978).Google Scholar
Albert, Hans, Kritik der reinen Erkenntnislehre (Mohr Siebeck 1987).Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, “Diskurstheorie und Menschenrechte” in Alexy, Robert (ed) Recht, Vernunft, Diskurs: Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie (Suhrkamp 1995) 127–164.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert, “Hans Kelsens Begriff des relativen Apriori” in Alexy, Robert et al (eds) Neukantianismus und Rechtsphilosophie (Nomos 2002) 179–202.Google Scholar
Alfano, Mark and Loeb, Don, “Experimental Moral Philosophy” in Zalta, Edward N (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (August 9, 2018), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/experimental-moral/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Allen, Meredith, Perry, Conrad and Kaufman, Jordy, “Toddlers Prefer to Help Familiar People” (2018) 174 Psychology 90–102.Google ScholarPubMed
Als, Heidelise, “Social Interaction: Dynamic Matrix for Developing Behavioral Organization” in Užgiris, Ina Č (ed) Social Interaction during Infancy: New Directions for Child Development Vol 4 (Jossey-Bass 1979) 21–39.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Jiménez, Alberto, “Methods for the Identification of Customary International Law in the International Court of Justice’s New Millennium Jurisprudence: 2000–2009” (2011) 60 (3) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 681–712.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl and Höffe, Otfried (eds), Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy (Cambridge University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Amrhein-Hofmann, Christine, Monismus und Dualismus in den Völkerrechtslehren (Duncker & Humblot 2003).Google Scholar
Andersen, Hans Christian, “Des Kaisers neue Kleider” in Andersen, Hans Christian (ed) Gesammelte Märchen I (Carl B Lorck 1847) 37–44.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism (Verso 6th ed 2006).Google Scholar
Anzilotti, Dionisio, Corso di diritto internazionale (Athenaeum 2nd ed 1912).Google Scholar
Anzilotti, Dionisio, Lehrbuch des Völkerrechts (German translation by Cornelia Bruns and Karl Schmid W de Gruyter 1929).Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto, “Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft und die Grundlagen der Ethik: Zum Problem einer rationalen Begründung der Ethik im Zeitalter der Wissenschaft” in Apel, Karl-Otto (ed) Transformation der Philosophie Vol 2 (Suhrkamp 1973) 358–435.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto, Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective (translated by Georgia Warnke MIT Press 1984 [Die Erklären-Verstehen-Kontroverse in Transzendental-Pragmatischer Sicht Suhrkamp 1979]).Google Scholar
Apperly, Ian and Butterfill, Stephen, “Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States?” (2009) 116 Psychological Review 953–970.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Truth (translated and edited by R W Schmidt, Robert W Mulligan and James V McGlynn Hackett 1994 [Quaestiones disputatae de Veritate 1256–1259]).Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, Gaetano, “International Law and Interindividual Law” in Nijman, Janne and Nollkaemper, André (eds) New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 15–51.Google Scholar
Ashford, Elizabeth and Mulgan, Tim, “Contractualism” in Zalta, Edward N (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (April 20, 2018), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractualism/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Atwood, George E and Stolorow, Robert D, Structures of Subjectivity: Explorations in Psychoanalytic Phenomenology and Contextualism (Routledge 2nd ed 2014).Google Scholar
Auby, Jean-Bernard, “Globalisation et droit public” in Gouverner, administrer, juger. Mélanges en l’honneur de Jean Waline (Dalloz 2002) 135–157.Google Scholar
Audit, Robert, Epistemology. A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (Routledge 3rd ed 2011).Google Scholar
Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press 3rd ed 2013).Google Scholar
Avbelj, Matej, “Supremacy or Primacy of EU Law: (Why) Does It Matter?” (2011) 17 (6) European Law Journal 744–763.Google Scholar
Avbelj, Matej, Fontanelli, Filippo and Martinico, Giuseppe (eds), Kadi on Trial: A Multifaceted Analysis of the Kadi Trial (Routledge 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awad, Edmond et al, “The Moral Machine Experiment” (2018) 563 (7729) Nature 59–64.Google Scholar
Awad, Edmond et al, “Universals and Variations in Moral Decisions Made in 42 Countries by 70,000 Participants” (2020) 117 (5) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2332–2337.Google Scholar
Baquero Cruz, Julio, “The Legacy of the Maastricht-Urteil and the Pluralist Movement” (2008) 14 (4) European Law Journal 389–422.Google Scholar
Barents, René, The Autonomy of Community Law (Kluwer 2004).Google Scholar
Basdevant, Jules, “Règles générales du droit de la paix” (1936) 58 Recueil des Cours IV 471–715.Google Scholar
Bast, Jürgen, “Autonomy in Decline? A Commentary on Rimšēvičs and ECB v Latvia” (May 13, 2019) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/autonomy-in-decline-a-commentary-on-rimsevics-and-ecb-v-latvia/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Bateson, Mary C, “The Epigenesis of Conversational Interaction: A Personal Account of Research Development” in Bullowa, Margaret (ed) Before Speech: The Beginning of Human Communication (Cambridge University Press 1979) 63–77.Google Scholar
Batson, C Daniel et al, “Immorality from Empathy-Induced Altruism: When Compassion and Justice Conflict” (1995) 68 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1042–1054.Google Scholar
Bauerschmidt, Jonathan, Die Rechtsperson der Europäischen Union im Wandel. Auswirkungen differenzierter Integration durch Völkerrecht auf die Europäische Union (Mohr Siebeck 2019).Google Scholar
Baumann, Peter, Erkenntnistheorie (J B Metzler 3rd ed 2015).Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Gerhard, “Der Rang des Gemeinschaftsrechts im Stufenbau der Rechtsordnung” (2000) 8 Journal für Rechtspolitik 84–99.Google Scholar
Bäumler, Jelena, “Vom Vertragstext zum Inkrafttreten: Das Vertragsschlussverfahren im Mehrebenensystem am Beispiel CETA” (2016) 51 (6) Europarecht 607–631.Google Scholar
Bazalgette, Peter, The Empathy Instinct: How to Create a More Civil Society (John Murray 2017).Google Scholar
Beckermann, Ansgar, “Die realistischen Voraussetzungen der Konsenstheorie von J. Habermas” (1972) 3 (1) Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 63–80.Google Scholar
Bederman, David J, Globalization and International Law (Palgrave 2008).Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, “In the Shadow of Aristotle and Hegel: Communicative Ethics and Current Controversies in Practical Philosophy” (1989) 21 (1) Philosophical Forum 1–31.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, “Another Universalism: On the Unity and Diversity of Human Rights” (2007) 81 Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 7–32.Google Scholar
Benson, Peter, “François Gény’s Doctrine of Customary Law” (1982) 20 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 267–281.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Andreas, Zur Souveränitätskonzeption des Europäischen Gerichtshofs (Mohr Siebeck 2018).Google Scholar
Bergmann, Gustav, “Strawson’s Ontology” (1960) 57 (19) Journal of Philosophy 601–622.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Gustav, Logic and Reality (University of Wisconsin Press 1964).Google Scholar
Berka, Walter, Verfassungsrecht (Verlag Österreich 6th ed 2016).Google Scholar
Berman, Paul S, “Global Legal Pluralism” (2007) 80 Southern California Law Review 1155–1238.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul S, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders (Oxford University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Paul S, “How Legal Pluralism Is and Is Not Distinct from Liberalism: A Response to Alexis Galán and Dennis Patterson” (2013) 11 (3) International Journal of Constitutional Law 801–808.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul S, “Jurisgenerative Constitutionalism: Procedural Principles for Managing Global Legal Pluralism” (2013) 20 (2) Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 665–695.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul S, “From Legal Pluralism to Global Legal Pluralism” in Nobles, Richard and Schiff, David (eds) Law, Society and Community Socio-Legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell (Ashgate 2014) 255–271.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul S, “The Evolution of Global Legal Pluralism” in Cotterrell, Roger and Del Mar, Maksymilian (eds) Authority in Transnational Legal Theory: Theorising across Disciplines (Edward Elgar 2016) 151–188.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, “Whose Constitution(s)? International Law, Constitutionalism, and Democracy” in Dunhoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P (eds) Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press 2009) 381–408.Google Scholar
Betlem, Gerrit and Nollkaemper, André, “Giving Effect to Public International Law and European Community Law before Domestic Courts. A Comparative Analysis of the Practice of Consistent Interpretation” (2003) 14 (3) European Journal of International Law 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea, “Assessing the Effectiveness of the UN Security Council’s Anti-Terrorism Measures: The Quest for Legitimacy and Cohesion” (2017) 17 (5) European Journal of International Law 881–919.Google Scholar
Biernat, Stanisław et al, “Statement of Retired Judges of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal” (October 11, 2021) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/statement-of-retired-judges-of-the-polish-constitutional-tribunal [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Bigman, Yochanan E and Gray, Kurt, “Life and Death Decisions of Autonomous Vehicles” (2020) 549 (7797) Nature E1–E2.Google Scholar
Binder, Christina, Die Grenzen der Vertragstreue im Völkerrecht (Springer 2012).Google Scholar
Bird-Pollan, Stefan, “Rawls: Construction and Justification” (2009) 1 (2) Public Reason 12–30.Google Scholar
Bix, Brian, Jurisprudence: Theory and Context (Sweet & Maxwell 5th ed 2009).Google Scholar
Blaffer Hrdy, Sarah, Mothers and Others (Harvard University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Blecha, Jörg, “Mit Anstand auf die Welt” (December 16, 2006) Spiegel, available at www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-49929836.html [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Blecha, Jörg and von Bredow, Rafaela, “Die Grammatik des Guten” (July 30, 2007) Spiegel, available at www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-52417856.html [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Bleckmann, Albert, “Die Position des Völkerrechts im inneren Rechtsraum der EG. Monismus oder Dualismus der Rechtsordnungen?” (1975) 18 German Yearbook of International Law 300–319.Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul, “Populist Counter-Constitutionalism, Conservatism, and Legal Fundamentalism” (2019) 15 (3) European Constitutional Law Review 519–543.Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul and Jarudi, Izzat, “The Chomsky of Morality? A View of Morality as the Product of an Innate Mental Faculty – Rather Like Language” (2006) 443 Nature 909–910.Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul, Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion (Ecco 2016).Google Scholar
Bobić, Ana, The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict in the European Union (Oxford University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boelaert, Sonja, “Minding the Gap: Reflections on the Relationship between EU Law and Public International Law in the Light of the Judgment in Case C-364/10 Hungary v Slovakia” in Czuczai, Jenő and Naert, Frederik (eds) The EU as a Global Actor – Bridging Legal Theory and Practice: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Ricardo Gosalbo Bono (Brill Nijhoff 2017) 217–240.Google Scholar
Bogdanowicz, Piotr and Taborowski, Maciej, “How to Save a Supreme Court in a Rule of Law Crisis: The Polish Experience” (2020) 16 (2) European Constitutional Law Review 306–327.Google Scholar
Bohman, James and Rehg, William, “Jürgen Habermas” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (August 4, 2014), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/habermas/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Bonelli, Matteo, “The Taricco Saga and the Consolidation of Judicial Dialogue in the European Union: CJEU, C-105/14 Ivo Taricco and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2015:555; and C-42/17 M.A.S., M.B., ECLI:EU:C:2017:936 Italian Constitutional Court, Order no. 24/2017” (2018) 25 (3) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 357–373.Google Scholar
Bonnefon, Jean-François, Rahwan, Iyad and Shariff, Azim, “The Social Dilemma of Autonomous Vehicles” (2016) 352 (6293) Science 1573–1576.Google Scholar
Bostrom, Nick, “Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?” (2003) 53 (211) Philosophical Quarterly 243–255.Google Scholar
Bradley, Kieran, “Investor–State Dispute Tribunals Established under EU International Agreements: Opinion 1/17 (EU-Canada CETA)” in Butler, Graham and Wessel, Ramses A (eds) EU External Relations Law. The Cases in Context (Hart 2022) 959–969.Google Scholar
Bråten, Stein and Trevarthen, Colwyn, “Prologue. From Infant Intersubjectivity and Participant Movements to Simulation and Conversation in Cultural Common Sense” in Bråten, Stein (ed) On Being Moved: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy (John Benjamins North America 2007) 21–34.Google Scholar
Brazelton, T Berry, “Evidence of Communication During Neonatal Behavioural Assessment” in Bullowa, Margaret (ed) Before Speech: The Beginning of Human Communication (Cambridge University Press 1979) 79–88.Google Scholar
Brazelton, T Berry and Nuget, J Kevin, The Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (Mac Keith Press 1995).Google Scholar
Breuer, Hubertus, “Das Moral-Gen: Ist das Gute im Menschen angeboren? Wissenschafter meinen: ja” (March 31, 2007) Profil, available at www.profil.at/home/das-moral-gen-ist-gute-menschen-wissenschafter-169043 [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Breuer, Marten, “Wider das Recht auf Vergessen … des Bundesverfassungsgerichts!” (December 2, 2019) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/wider-das-recht-auf-vergessen-des-bundesverfassungsgerichts/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Brierly, John L, The Law of Nations (Oxford University Press 1963).Google Scholar
Broad, Kevin D, Curley, James P and Keverne, Eric B, “Mother–Infant Bonding and the Evolution of Mammalian Social Relationships” (2006) 361 (1476) Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2199–2214.Google Scholar
Brockmöller, Annette, Kirste, Stephan and Neumann, Ulfrid (eds), Wert und Wahrheit in der Rechtswissenschaft ARSP Beiheft 145 (Franz Steiner 2015).Google Scholar
Brodherr, Anke, Alfred Verdross’ Theorie des gemäßigten Monismus (Herbert Utz 2004).Google Scholar
Brölmann, Catherine, “Deterritorialization in International Law: Moving Away from the Divide between National and International Law” in Nijman, Janne E. and Nollkaemper, André (eds) New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 84–108.Google Scholar
Buckle, Stephen, Natural Law and the Theory of Property (Oxford Clarendon Press 1991).Google Scholar
Budras, Corinna, “EZB hätte kooperativer sein müssen” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung June 29, 2020.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas, “Self-Executing and Non-Self-Executing Treaties in National and International Law” (1992) 235 Recueil des Cours Vol IV 303–400.Google Scholar
Bulygin, Eugenio, “Das Problem der Geltung bei Kelsen” in Paulson, Stanley L and Stolleis, Michael (eds) Hans Kelsen – Staatsrechtslehrer und Rechtstheoretiker des 20. Jahrhunderts (Mohr Siebeck 2004) 80–95.Google Scholar
Burchardt, Dana, Die Rangfrage im europäischen Normenverbund. Theoretische Grundlagen und dogmatische Grundzüge des Verhältnisses von Unionsrecht und nationalem Recht (Mohr Siebeck 2015).Google Scholar
Burchardt, Dana, “Die Ausübung der Identitätskontrolle durch das Bundesverfassungsgericht – Zugleich Besprechung des Beschlusses 2 BvR 2735/14 des BVerfG vom 15.12.2015 (‚Solange III‘/‘Europäischer Haftbefehl II‘)” (2016) 76 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 527–551.Google Scholar
Burchardt, Dana, “Belittling the Primacy of EU Law in Taricco II” (December 7, 2017) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/belittling-the-primacy-of-eu-law-in-taricco-ii/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Burchardt, Dana, “The Relationship between the Law of the European Union and the Law of Its Member States – A Norm-Based Conceptual Framework” (2019) 15 (1) European Constitutional Law Review 73–103.Google Scholar
Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence, “La mobilisation de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne par les juridictions constitutionnelles” (2019) Titre VII (2) De l’intégration des ordres juridiques: droit constitutionnel et droit de l’Union européenne 31–40.Google Scholar
Burke-White, William W, “International Legal Pluralism” (2005) 25 (4) Michigan Journal of International Law 963–979.Google Scholar
Bußjäger, Peter, Homogenität und Differenz: Zur Theorie der Aufgabenverteilung zwischen Bund und Ländern in Österreich (Braumüller 2006).Google Scholar
Bußjäger, Peter and Heißl, Gregor, “Nationaler Souveränitätsanspruch versus autonome Rechtsordnung? Integrationsschranken im Spannungsverhältnis zur Vorrangjudikatur” (2008) 34 (8) Österreichische Juristenzeitung 307–315.Google Scholar
Bußjäger, Peter, “Folgerungen aus dem Lissabonurteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts” (2010) 132 (5) Juristische Blätter 273–283.Google Scholar
Butler, Graham, Constitutional Law of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy: Competence and Institutions in External Relations (Hart 2019).Google Scholar
Buttelmann, David, Carpenter, Malinda and Tomasello, Michael, “Eighteen-Month-Old Infants Show False Belief Understanding in an Active Helping Paradigm” (2009) 112 (2) Cognition 337–342.Google Scholar
Buttelmann, David et al, “Eighteen-Month-Olds Understand False Beliefs in an Unexpected-Contents Task” (2014) 119 Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 120–126.Google Scholar
Buttelmann, David et al, “Great Apes Distinguish True from False Beliefs in an Interactive Helping Task” (2017) 12 (4) PLoS ONE.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 1999).Google Scholar
Çalı, Başak, The Authority of International Law: Obedience, Respect, and Rebuttal (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Calliess, Christian and van der Schyff, Gerhard, Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, Enzo, “The Neo-Monism of the European Legal Order” in Cannizzaro, Enzo, Palchetti, Paolo and Wessel, Ramses A (eds) International Law as Law of the European Union (Martinus Nijhoff 2012) 35–58.Google Scholar
Capps, John, “The Pragmatic Theory of Truth” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (March 21, 2019), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-pragmatic/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Carpenter, Malinda and Liebal, Kristin, “Joint Attention, Communication, and Knowing Together in Infancy” in Seemann, Axel (ed) Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience (MIT Press 2011) 159–181.Google Scholar
Cartabia, Marta, “The Italian Constitutional Court and the Relationship between the Italian Legal System and the European Community” (1990) 12 Michigan International Law Journal 173–203.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, International Law (Oxford University Press 2nd ed 2005).Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius, “The Logic of Magmas and the Question of Autonomy” in Cornelius Castoriadis, The Castoriadis Reader (translated and edited by David A Curtis Oxford University Press 1997) 290–318.Google Scholar
Charney, Jonathan Ian, “The Persistent Objector Rule and the Development of Customary International Law” (1985) 56 British Yearbook of International Law 1–24.Google Scholar
Charney, Jonathan Ian, “Universal International Law” (1993) 87 (4) American Journal of International Law 529–551.Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin, “United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: ‘Instant’ Customary International Law?” (1965) 5 Indian Journal of International Law 23–48.Google Scholar
Cheng, Yawei et al, “Love Hurts: An fMRI Study” (2010) 51 (2) Neuro Image 923–929.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Syntactic Structures (Mouton 1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (MIT Press 1965).Google Scholar
Christoph, Krenn, “Warum Unionsrecht Vorrang hat: Zur aktualisierten Begr?ndung des Vorrangprinzips in den Urteilen Euro Box Promotion und R.S.”Google Scholar
Churchland, Patricia S, Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality (Princeton University Press 2011) 18–19.Google Scholar
Churchland, Patricia S, “The Neurobiological Platform for Moral Values” (2014) 151 Behaviour 283–296.Google Scholar
Claes, Monica, The National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution (Hart 2006).Google Scholar
Claes, Monica, “National Identity: Trump Card or Up for Negotiation?” in Arnaiz, Alejandro Saiz and Llivina, Carina Alcoberro (eds) National Constitutional Identity and European Integration (Intersentia 2013) 109–139.Google Scholar
Claes, Monica, “The Primacy of EU Law in European and National Law” in Chalmers, Damian and Arnull, Anthony (eds) The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 178–211.Google Scholar
Cloots, Elke, National Identity in EU Law (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann, Das Prinzip der Infinitesimal-Methode und seine Geschichte (Dümmler 1883 [partially translated by Hermann Cohen, “‘Introduction’ to The Principle of the Infinitesimal Method and its History (1883)” in Sebastian Luft (ed) The Neo-Kantian Reader (partially translated by David Hyder and Lydia Patton Routledge 2015)]).Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann, Kants Theorie der Erfahrung (Dümmler 2nd ed 1885 [partially translated by David Hyder as “‘The Synthetic Principles’ from Kant’s Theory of Experience (1885)” in Sebastian Luft (ed) The Neo-Kantian Reader (Routledge 2015) 107–116]).Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann, “Biographisches Vorwort und Einleitung mit kritischem Nachtrag” in Lange, Friedrich (ed) Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart (Baedeker 6th ed 1898) xv–lxxvi.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann, Logik der reinen Erkenntnis (Cassirer 3rd ed 1922).Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann, Logik der reinen Erkenntnis (Georg Olms Hermann Cohen Werke Vol 6 I 4th ed 1977 [Bruno Cassirer 2nd ed 1914]).Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann, System der Philosophie, Zweiter Teil: Ethik des reinen Willens (Georg Olms Hermann Cohen Werke Vol 7 II 5th ed 1981 [Bruno Cassirer 2nd ed 1907]).Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann, Kants Theorie der Erfahrung (Georg Olms 1987 Hermann Cohen Werke Vol 1 I.3 [Dümmler 1st ed 1871]).Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L, Globalization and Sovereignty. Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Cohon, Rachel, “Hume’s Moral Philosophy” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (August 20, 2018), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-moral/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Constantinesco, Vlad and Simon, Denys, “Quelques problèmes des relations extérieures des Communautés Européennes” (1975) 11 Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 432–469.Google Scholar
Conway, Gerard, “Conflicts of Competence Norms in EU Law and the Legal Reasoning of the ECJ” (2010) 11 (9) German Law Journal 966–1005.Google Scholar
Correa-Chávez, Maricela and Roberts, Amy L D, “A Cultural Analysis Is Necessary in Understanding Intersubjectivity” (2012) 18 (1) Culture & Psychology 99–108.Google Scholar
Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre, “Are Agreements between States and Non-State Entities Rooted in the International Legal Order?” in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed) The Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press 2011) 3–24.Google Scholar
Costa, Albert et al, “Your Morals Depend on Language” (2014) 9 (4) Public Library of Science ONE 1–7.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger, Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory (Ashgate 2006).Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger, “Does Global Legal Pluralism Need a Concept of Law?” in Baxi, Upendra, McCrudden, Christopher and Paliwala, Abdul (eds) Law’s Ethical, Global and Theoretical Contexts – Essays in Honour of William Twining (Cambridge University Press 2015) 303–319.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M, “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term-Foreword: Nomos and Narrative” (1983) 97 (4) Harvard Law Review 4–68.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M, “Violence and the Word” (1986) 95 (8) Yale Law Journal 1601–1629.Google Scholar
Cowie, Fiona, “Innateness and Language” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (January 16, 2008), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/innateness-language/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Craig, Paul, The Lisbon Treaty. Law, Politics and Treaty Reform (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Craig, Paul, “The ECJ and Ultra Vires Action: A Conceptual Analysis” (2011) 48 (2) Common Market Law Review 395–437.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul, “Constitutional Identity in the United Kingdom. An Evolving Concept” in Calliess, Christian and van der Schyff, Gerhard (eds) Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) 284–302.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne, EU Law. Text, Cases, and Materials (Oxford University Press 7th ed 2020).Google Scholar
Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 8th ed 2012).Google Scholar
Cremer, Wolfram, “Artikel 21 EUV” in Calliess, Christian and Ruffert, Matthias (eds) EUV/AEUV (CH Beck 6th ed 2022) 351–356.Google Scholar
Cremona, Marise, “External Relations and External Competence of the European Union” in Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Graínne (eds) The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press 2nd ed 2011) 217–268.Google Scholar
Cremona, Marise (ed), Structural Principles in EU External Relations Law (Hart 2018).Google Scholar
Croquet, Nicolas AJ, “The Import of International Customary Law into the EU Legal Order: The Adequacy of a Direct Effect Analysis” (2013) 15 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 47–81.Google Scholar
Csibra, Gergely, “Recognizing Communicative Intentions” (2010) 25 (2) Infancy, Mind and Language 141–168.Google Scholar
Csibra, Gergely and Gergely, György, “Natural Pedagogy” (2009) 13 (4) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 148–153.Google Scholar
Cudd, Ann and Eftekhari, Seena, “Contractarianism” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (March 15, 2017), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractarianism/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Curtin, Deirdre, “Official Secrets and the Negotiation of International Agreements: Is the EU Executive Unbound?” (2013) 50 (2) Common Market Law Review 423–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Cornell University Press 1971).Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, Jean, Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Dahm, Georg, Völkerrecht Vol I (De Gruyter 1958).Google Scholar
Damestoy, Manon and Levrat, Nicolas, “The Mixed Nature of the EU-Canada FTA. Between Competences Distribution and Democratic Legitimacy” in Levrat, Nicolas et al (eds) The EU and Its Member States’ Joint Participation in International Agreements (Hart 2022) 77–95.Google Scholar
Damm, Carolin, Die Europäische Union im universellen Völkergewohnheitsrecht (Mohr Siebeck 2016).Google Scholar
Damon, William, “Fair Distribution and Sharing: The Development of Positive Justice” in Puka, Bill (ed) Fundamental Research in Moral Development (Garland Publishing 1994) 189–254.Google Scholar
Danilenko, Gennady M, “Application of Customary International Law to Municipal Law” in Tunkin, Grigory I and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds) International and Municipal Law (Duncker & Humblot 1988) 13–23.Google Scholar
Danilenko, Gennady M, “The Theory of Customary International Law” (1988) 31 German Yearbook of International Law 9–47.Google Scholar
Danilenko, Gennady M, Law-Making in the International Community (Brill 1993).Google Scholar
Dashwood, Alan, “EU Acts and Member State Acts in the Negotiation, Conclusion, and Implementation of International Agreements” in Cremona, Marise and Kilpatrick, Claire (eds) EU Legal Acts. Challenges and Transformations (Oxford University Press 2018) 189–249.Google Scholar
David, Marian, “The Correspondence Theory of Truth” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (May 28, 2015), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford University Press 1984).Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald, “The Centrality of Truth” in Peregrin, Jaroslav (ed) Truth and Its Nature (If Any) (Springer 1999) 105–115.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald, “The Folly of Trying to Define Truth” in Lynch, Michael P (ed) The Nature of Truth. Classic and Contemporary Perspectives (MIT Press 2001) 623–640.Google Scholar
De Baere, Geert, Constitutional Principles of EU External Relations (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
De Baere, Geert and Koutrakos, Panos, “The Interactions between the Legislature and the Judiciary in EU External Relations” in Syrpis, Phil (ed) The Judiciary, the Legislature and the EU Internal Market (Cambridge University Press 2012) 243–273.Google Scholar
De Baere, Geert and Ryngaert, Cedric, “The ECJ’s Judgment in Air Transport Association of America and the International Legal Context” (2013) 18 (3) European Foreign Affairs Review 389–409.Google Scholar
De Baere, Geert and Van den Sanden, Tina, “Interinstitutional Gravity and Pirates of the Parliament on Stranger Tides: The Continued Constitutional Significance of the Choice of Legal Basis in Post-Lisbon External Action” (2016) 12 (1) European Constitutional Law Review 85–113.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne, “The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi” (2010) 51 (1) Harvard International Law Journal 1–48.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Graínne, “The Road Not Taken. The European Union as a Global Human Rights Actor” (2011) 105 (4) American Journal of International Law 649–693.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Graínne, “The ECJ and the International Legal Order: A Re-Evaluation” in de Búrca, Graínne and Weiler, Joseph H H (eds) The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2012) 105–149.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne, “International Law before the Courts. The EU and the US Compared” (2015) 55 (3) Virginia Journal of International Law 685–728.Google Scholar
De Sousa Santos, Boaventura, Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition (Routledge 1995).Google Scholar
De Waal, Frans, The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society (Crown/Archetype 2010).Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno, “European Union Law: How Autonomous Is Its Legal Order?” (2010) 65 Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 141–155.Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno, “Direct Effect, Primacy and the Nature of the Legal Order” in de Búrca, Gráinne and Craig, Paul (eds) The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press 2011) 323–362.Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno and Martinelli, Thibault, “Treaties between EU Member States as Quasi-Instruments of EU Law” in Cremona, Marise and Kilpatrick, Claire (eds) EU Legal Acts. Challenges and Transformations (Oxford University Press 2018) 157–188.Google Scholar
Debiec, Jacek and Sullivan, Regina Marie, “Intergenerational Transmission of Emotional Trauma through Amygdala-Dependent Mother-to-Infant Transfer of Specific Fear” (2014) 111 (33) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 12222–12227.Google Scholar
Décencière-Ferrandière, André, “Considérations sur le Droit International dans ses Rapports avec le Droit de l’État” (1933) 40 (1) Revue Générale de Droit International Public 45–70.Google Scholar
Decety, Jean and Cowell, Jason M, “Friends or Foes: Is Empathy Necessary for Moral Behavior?” (2014) 9 (4) Perspectives on Psychological Science 525–537.Google Scholar
Deckert, Martina, “Recht und Wahrheit. Zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Diskussion” (1996) 82 (1) Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 43–54.Google Scholar
Dederer, Hans-Georg, “Die Grenzen des Vorrangs des Unionsrechts – zur Vereinheitlichung von Grundrechts-, Ultra-vires- und Identitätskontrolle” (2014) 69 (7) JuristenZeitung 313–322.Google Scholar
Delafield-Butt, Jonathan and Trevarthen, Colwyn, “Theories of the Development of Human Communication” in Cobley, Paul and Schultz, Peter J (eds) Theories and Models of Communication (Mouton De Gruyter 2013) 199–222.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Jost, “Begriff, Geltung u. Erscheinungsformen des Völkerrechts” in Dahm, Georg et al (eds) Völkerrecht Vol I/1 (De Gruyter 2nd ed 1989) 27.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Jost, “Das Individuum im Völkerrecht” in Dahm, Georg et al (eds) Völkerrecht Vol. I/2 (De Gruyter 2nd ed 2002) 259.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Jost, “Verbindlichkeit und Geltungsbereich der Verträge” in Dahm, Georg et al (eds) Völkerrecht Vol I/3 (De Gruyter 2nd ed 2002) 600.Google Scholar
Delgado Casteleiro, Andrés, The International Responsibility of the European Union. From Competence to Normative Control (Cambridge University Press 2018) 32–33.Google Scholar
Delhomme, Vincent and Larripa, Lucie, “C-416/17 Commission v France: Failure of a Member State to Fulfil its Obligations Article 267(3) TFEU” (November 22, 2018) European Law Blog, available at https://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/11/22/c-416-17-commission-v-france-failure-of-a-member-state-to-fulfil-its-obligations-under-article-2673-tfeu/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Les forces imaginantes du droit (II) : Le pluralisme ordonné (Seuil 2006).Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World (translated by Naomi Norberg Hart 2009).Google Scholar
Denza, Eileen, “International Aviation and the EU Carbon Trading Scheme: Comment on the Air Transport Association of America Case” (2012) 37 (3) European Law Review 314–326.Google Scholar
Denza, Eileen, “Placing the European Union in International Context: Legitimacy of the Case Law” in Adams, Maurice et al (eds) Judging Europe’s Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice (Hart 2013) 175–196.Google Scholar
Descartes, René, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (edited by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert and Murdoch, Dugald Cambridge University Press 1984).Google Scholar
Dewey, John and Bentley, Arthur, Knowing and the Known (Beacon Press 1949).Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, George and Livieri, Paolo, “Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (December 6, 2018), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/friedrich-jacobi/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Dias, Brian G and Ressler, Kerry J, “Parental Olfactory Experience Influences Behavior and Neural Structure in Subsequent Generations” (2014) 17 (1) Nature Neuroscience 89–98.Google Scholar
Dickson, Julie, “Towards a Theory of European Union Legal Systems” in Dickson, Julie and Eleftheriadis, Pavlos (eds) Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 25–53.Google Scholar
Dietze, Jan et al, “Europa – Quo Vadis? Ein kritischer Kommentar zum EZB-Urteil des BverfG” (2020) 31 (12) Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 525–530.Google Scholar
Diggelmann, Oliver and Altwicker, Tilmann, “Is There Something Like a Constitution of International Law? A Critical Analysis of the Debate on World Constitutionalism” (2008) 68 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 623–650.Google Scholar
Doore, Isaak I, The Epistemological Foundations of Law (Carolina Academic Press 2007).Google Scholar
Dörr, Oliver, “Art 31 and 32” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (Springer 2nd ed 2018).Google Scholar
Dougan, Michael, “The Primacy of Union Law over Incompatible National Measures: Beyond Disapplication and towards a Remedy of Nullity” (2022) 59 (5) Common Market Law Review 1301–1332.Google Scholar
Dreier, Horst, Rechtslehre, Staatssoziologie und Demokratietheorie bei Hans Kelsen (Nomos 2nd ed 1990).Google Scholar
Dreier, Ralf, “Bemerkungen zur Theorie der Grundnorm” in Hans Kelsen-Institut (ed) Die Reine Rechtslehre in wissenschaftlicher Diskussion (Manz 1982) 38–46.Google Scholar
Drinóczi, Tímea, “Hungarian Constitutional Court: The Limits of EU Law in the Hungarian Legal System: Judgment of 5 December 2016, No 22/2016” (2017) 11 (1) Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 139–151.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon, Souveraineté et liberté (Éditions La Mémoire du Droit 1922).Google Scholar
Duhigg, Charles, The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business (Random House 2012).Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael, Frege: Philosophy of Language (Harper & Row 1973).Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael, Origins of Analytical Philosophy (Harvard University Press 1993).Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P, “A Functional Approach to International Constitutionalization” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P (eds) Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press 2009) 3–35.Google Scholar
Dupoux, Emmanuel and Jacob, Pierre, “Universal Moral Grammar: A Critical Appraisal” (2007) 11 (9) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 373–378.Google Scholar
Dupré, John, “Making Hay with Straw Men. Book Review of Pinker, Steven. The Blank Slate” (2003) American Scientist, available at www.researchgate.net/profile/John-Dupre-2/publication/272353765_Making_Hay_with_Straw_Men_Review_of_Steven_Pinker_The_Blank_Slate_The_Modern_Denial_of_Human_Nature/links/54e2883b0cf296663796aabc/Making-Hay-with-Straw-Men-Review-of-Steven-Pinker-The-Blank-Slate-The-Modern-Denial-of-Human-Nature?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19 [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Eagleman, David, Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain (Pantheon 2011).Google Scholar
Eckes, Christina, EU Powers Under External Pressure. How the EU’s External Actions Alter its Internal Structures (Oxford University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Eckes, Christina, “The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order” (2020) 4 (1) Europe and the World: A Law Review 1–19.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, Piet, “Case C-308/06 The Queen, on the Application of International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (Intertanko) and Others v Secretary of State for Transport, judgment of the Court of Justice, (Grand Chamber) of 3 June 2008” (2009) 46 (6) Common Market Law Review 2041–2057.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, Piet, EU External Relations Law (Oxford University Press 2nd ed 2012).Google Scholar
Eeckhout, Piet, “Human Rights and the Autonomy of EU Law: Pluralism or Integration?” (2013) 66 (1) Current Legal Problems 169–202.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, Piet, “The Integration of Public International Law in EU Law: Analytical and Normative Questions” in Eeckhout, Piet and López-Escudero, Manuel (eds) The European Union’s External Action in Times of Crisis (Hart 2016) 189–204.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugen, Fundamental Principles of Sociology of Law (translated by Walter Lewis Moll Harvard University Press 1936 [Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts Duncker & Humblot 1913]).Google Scholar
Eleftheriadis, Pavlos, “Cosmopolitan Legitimacy” paper presented at the “Philosophical Foundations of Global Law” conference at the University of Cartagena, Colombia on August 25, 2016 (on file with the author).Google Scholar
Elias, Olufemi, “The Nature of the Subjective Element in Customary International Law” (1995) 44 (3) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 501–520.Google Scholar
Emde, Robert N et al, “The Moral Self of Infancy: Affective Core and Procedural Knowledge” (1991) 11 (3) Developmental Review 251–270.Google Scholar
Engisch, Karl, Die Einheit der Rechtsordnung (Winter 1935).Google Scholar
Engisch, Karl, Einführung in das juristische Denken (Kohlhammer 7th ed 1977).Google Scholar
Epiney, Astrid, “Zur Stellung des Völkerrechts in der EU. Zugleich Besprechung von EuGH, EuZW 1998, 572 – Hermès und EuGH, EuZW 1998, 964 – Racke” (1999) 9 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 5–11.Google Scholar
Epiney, Astrid, “Die Bindung der EU an das allgemeine Völkerrecht” in Obwexer, Walter (ed) Die Europäische Union im Völkerrecht (Nomos 2012) 25–48.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, Federico, “After the OMT Case: The Supremacy of EU Law as the Guarantee of the Equality of the Member States” (2015) 16 (4) German Law Journal 1003–1023.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard A, “The New States and International Legal Order” (1966) 118 Recueil des Cours 1–103.Google Scholar
Falk Moore, Sally, “Certainties Undone. Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology, 1949–1999” (2001) 7 (1) Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 95–116.Google Scholar
Faraguna, Pietro, “The Italian Constitutional Court in re Taricco: ‘Gauweiler in the Roman Campagna’” (January 31, 2017) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/the-italian-constitutional-court-in-re-taricco-gauweiler-in-the-roman-campagna/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Fassbender, Bardo, “Triepel in Luxemburg: Die dualistische Sicht des Verhältnisses zwischen Europa- und Völkerrecht in der ‘Kadi-Rechtssprechung’ des EuGH als Problem des Selbstverständnisses der Europäischen Union” (2010) 63 (8) Die öffentliche Verwaltung 333–341.Google Scholar
Fastenrath, Ulrich, Kompetenzverteilung im Bereich der auswärtigen Gewalt (CH Beck 1986).Google Scholar
Fastenrath, Ulrich, Lücken im Völkerrecht – Zu Rechtscharakter, Quellen, Systemzusammenhang, Methodenlehre und Funktionen des Völkerrechts (Duncker & Humblot 1991).Google Scholar
Fastenrath, Ulrich, “Anmerkung” (2016) 71 (12) JuristenZeitung 636–640.Google Scholar
Fastenrath, Ulrich and Groh, Thomas, “Art 59 GG” in Friauf, Karl Heinrich and Höfling, Wolfram (eds) Berliner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz (Erich Schmidt 22 sup 2007).Google Scholar
Feinäugle, Clemens, “Kadi Case” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Fénelon, François, Lives of the Ancient Philosophers (Knight and Lacey 1825 [translated from Abrégé des vies des anciens philosophes, Paris 1726, 314]).Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, “Über den Begriff der Wissenschaftslehre” in Fichte, Immanuel Hermann (ed) FichtesWerke Vol 1 (Walter de Gruyter 1971 [1834–1846]) 27–81.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford Clarendon Press 2nd ed 2011).Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, “Regime-Collision: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law” (2004) 25 (4) Michigan Journal of International Law 999–1046.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald G, “The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951–54: General Principles and Sources of Law” (1953) 30 British Yearbook of International Law 1–70.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald G, “The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law” (1957) 92 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International 1–227.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald, “Some Problems Regarding the Formal Sources of International Law” in van Asbeck, Frederik Mari et al (eds) Symbolae Verzijl (Martinus Nijhoff 1958) 153–176.Google Scholar
Flynn, Tom, The Triangular Constitution. Constitutional Pluralism in Ireland, the EU and the ECHR (Hart 2020).Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa, The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect in Virtues and Vices (Basil Blackwell 1978), originally appearing as Foot, Philippa, “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect” (1967) 5 Oxford Review 5–15.Google Scholar
Freeman, Colin L et al, “Structural Control of Crystal Nuclei by an Eggshell Protein” (2010) 49 (30) Angewandte Chemie International Edition 5135–5137.Google Scholar
Freeman, Walter J, “Nonlinear Brain Dynamics and Intention According to Aquinas” (2008) 6 (2) Mind and Matter 207–234.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logische mathematische Untersuchung (Wilhelm Koebner 2nd ed 1884).Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob, The Foundations of Arithmetic. A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number (translated by J L Austin Harper 2nd ed 1953 [Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl Wilhelm Koebner 1884]).Google Scholar
Fuller, Chris, “Legal Anthropology: Legal Pluralism and Legal Thought” (1994) 10 (3) Anthropology Today 9–12.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Gottfried, Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie. Von Descartes zu Wittgenstein (utb 3rd ed 2008).Google Scholar
Gabriel, Markus, An den Grenzen der Erkenntnistheorie. Die notwendige Endlichkeit des objektiven Wissens als Lektion des Skeptizismus (Karl Alber 2nd ed 2014).Google Scholar
Gabriel, Markus, Die Erkenntnis der Welt – Eine Einführung in die Erkenntnistheorie (Karl Alber 5th ed 2016).Google Scholar
Galán, Alexis and Patterson, Dennis, “The Limits of Normative Legal Pluralism: Review of Paul Schiff Berman, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders” (2013) 11 (3) International Journal of Constitutional Law 783–800.Google Scholar
Garben, Sacha and Govaere, Inge (eds), The Division of Competences between the EU and the Member States. Reflections on the Past, the Present and the Future (Hart 2017).Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter, “Slicing the Theory of Mind” (2001) 36 Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 7–34.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter, How Homo Became Sapiens: On the Evolution of Thinking (Oxford University Press 2003).Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter, “Evolutionary and Developmental Aspects of Intersubjectivity” in Liljenström, Hans and Århem, Peter (eds) Consciousness Transitions: Phylogenetic, Ontogenetic and Physiological Aspects (Elsevier 2007) 281–305.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter, “The Role of Intersubjectivity in Animal and Human Cooperation” (2008) 3 (1) Biological Theory 1–12.Google Scholar
Gatti, Mauro and Manzini, Pietro, “External Representation of the European Union in the Conclusion of International Agreements” (2012) 49 (5) Common Market Law Review 1703–1734.Google Scholar
Geiger, Rudolf, “Article 216 TFEU” in Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus and Kotzur, Markus (eds) European Union Treaties. A Commentary. Treaty on European Union. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (CH Beck and Hart 2015).Google Scholar
Gény, François, Methode d’interpretation et sources en droit prive positif (Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence 2nd ed 1919).Google Scholar
Gianelli, Alessandra, “Customary International Law in the European Union” in Cannizzaro, Enzo, Palchetti, Paolo and Wessel, Ramses A (eds) International Law as Law of the European Union (Martinus Nijhoff 2012) 93–110.Google Scholar
Gihl, Torsten, “The Legal Character of Sources of International Law” (1957) 1 Scandinavian Studies in Law 51–92.Google Scholar
Giner Torréns, Marta, Dreizler, Kristin and Kärtner, Joscha, “Insight into Toddlers’ Motivation to Help: From Social Participants to Prosocial Contributors” (2021) 64 Infant Behavior and Development 101603.Google Scholar
Giudice, Michael, “Global Legal Pluralism: What’s Law Got to Do with It?” (2014) 34 (3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 589–608.Google Scholar
Grabenwarter, Christoph, “Änderungen der österreichischen Bundesverfassung aus Anlaß des Beitritts zur Europäischen Union” (1995) 55 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 166–190.Google Scholar
Grabenwarter, Christoph, “Offene Staatlichkeit: Österreich” in von Bogdandy, Armin, Villalón, Cruz and Huber, Peter M (eds) Handbuch Ius Publicum Europaeum. Vol 2 Offene Staatlichkeit – Wissenschaft vom Verfassungsrecht (C F Müller 2008) 211–241.Google Scholar
Grabenwarter, Christoph, “National Constitutional Law Relating to the European Union” in von Bogdandy, Armin and Bast, Jürgen (eds) Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart et al 2nd ed 2011) 95–144.Google Scholar
Gragl, Paul, The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights (Hart 2013).Google Scholar
Gragl, Paul, “The Silence of the Treaties: General International Law and the European Union” (2014) 47 German Yearbook of International Law 375–410.Google Scholar
Gragl, Paul, “The Pure Theory of Law and Legal Monism – Epistemological Truth and Empirical Plausibility” (2015) 70 (4) Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 665–736.Google Scholar
Gragl, Paul, “In Defence of Kelsenian Monism: Countering Hart and Raz” (2017) 8 (2) Jurisprudence 287–318.Google Scholar
Gragl, Paul, Legal Monism: Law, Philosophy, and Politics (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Granat, Katarzyna, “Kontrolle des EU-Sekundärrechts durch den polnischen Verfassungsgerichtshof. Anmerkung zum Beschluss des polnischen Verfassungsgerichtshofs vom 16. November 2011, SK 45/09” (2013) 48 (2) Europarecht 205–214.Google Scholar
Green, James A, The Persistent Objector Rule in International Law (Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, “Law and Obligations” in Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law (Oxford University Press 2002 reprinted in 2011) 514–547.Google Scholar
Green, Michael S, “Hans Kelsen and the Logic of Legal Systems” (2003) 54 (2) Alabama Law Review 365–413.Google Scholar
Green, Michael S, “Marmor’s Kelsen” in Telman, D A Jeremy (ed) Hans Kelsen in America (Springer 2016) 31–55.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D, “Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality: Why Cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics” (2014) 124 (4) Ethics 695–726.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D, “The Rise of Moral Cognition” (2015) 135 Cognition 39–42.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D and Haidt, Jonathan, “How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?” (2002) 6 (12) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 517–523.Google Scholar
Greenspan, Stanley and Shanker, Stuart, The First Idea (Da Capo Press 2004).Google Scholar
Grewe, Constance, “Methods of Identification of National Constitutional Identity” in Arnaiz, Alejandro Saiz and Llivina, Carina Alcoberro (eds) National Constitutional Identity and European Integration (Intersentia 2013) 37–48.Google Scholar
Griffiths, John, “What Is Legal Pluralism?” (1986) 18 (24) Journal of Legal Pluralism 1–47.Google Scholar
Griffiths, John, “The Idea of Sociology of Law and Its Relation to Law and to Sociology” in Freeman, Michael (ed) Law and Sociology: Current Legal Issues Vol 8 (Oxford University Press 2006) 49–68.Google Scholar
Griller, Stefan, Die Übertragung von Hoheitsrechten auf zwischenstaatliche Einrichtungen (Springer 1989).Google Scholar
Griller, Stefan, “Verfassungsfragen der österreichischen EU-Mitgliedschaft” (1995) 9 Zeitschrift für Europarecht, internationales Privatrecht & Rechtsvergleichung 98–115.Google Scholar
Griller, Stefan, “Blockademöglichkeiten gegen die Einführung des Euro” (1997) 4 Journal für Rechtspolitik 221–233.Google Scholar
Griller, Stefan, “Der Stufenbau der österreichischen Rechtsordnung nach dem EU-Beitritt” (2000) 8 (4) Journal für Rechtspolitik 273–288.Google Scholar
Griller, Stefan, “Völkerrecht und Landesrecht – unter Berücksichtigung des Europarechts” in Walter, Robert, Jabloner, Clemens and Zeleny, Karl (eds) Hans Kelsen und das Völkerrecht: Ergebnisse eines internationalen Symposiums in Wien (Manz 2004) 83–120.Google Scholar
Griller, Stefan, “Executive Summary” in European Parliament and Directorate-General for International Policies (ed) National Constitutional Law and European Integration (European Parliament 2011) 11–31.Google Scholar
Griller, Stefan, “Fragmentierungen im Öffentlichen Recht: Diskursvergleich im internationalen und nationalen Recht” (2018) 77 Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 237–283.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter, “The Constitution in the Process of Denationalization” (2005) 12 (4) Constellations 447–463.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter, “The Democratic Costs of Constitutionalization: The European Case” in Grimm, Dieter, Constitutionalism. Past, Present, and Future (Oxford University Press 2015) 295–313.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter, “The Role of National Constitutions in a United Europe” in Grimm, Dieter, Constitutionalism. Past, Present, and Future (Oxford University Press 2015) 271–294.Google Scholar
Groce, Mariano and Goldoni, Marco, “A Sense of Self-Suspicion: Global Legal Pluralism and the Claim to Legal Authority” (2015) 8 (1) Ethics & Global Politics 1–20.Google Scholar
Groh, Kathrin, Demokratische Staatsrechtslehrer in der Weimarer Republik. Von der konstitutionellen Staatslehre zur Theorie des modernen demokratischen Verfassungsstaats (Mohr Siebeck 2010).Google Scholar
Grussmann, Wolf-Dietrich, “Grundnorm und Supranationalität – Rechtsstrukturelle Sichtweisen der europäischen Integration” in von Danwitz, Thomas et al (ed) Auf dem Wege zu einer europäischen Staatlichkeit (Boorberg 1993) 47–64.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, Paul, “Les deux éléments de la coutume en droit international” in Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence (ed) La technique et les principes du droit public: Études en l’honneur de Georges Scelle I (Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence 1950) 275–284.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, Paul, Traité de droit international public (Librairie de l’Université 1953).Google Scholar
Guggenheim, Paul, Traité de droit international public I (Librairie de l’Université 2nd ed 1967).Google Scholar
Günther, Klaus, “Legal Pluralism or Uniform Concept of Law? Globalisation as a Problem of Legal Theory” (2008) 5 No Foundations – Journal of Extreme Legal Positivism 5–21.Google Scholar
Günther, Klaus, “Normativer Rechtspluralismus: Eine Kritik” in Moos, Thorsten, Schlette, Magnus and Diefenbacher, Hans (eds) Das Recht im Blick der Anderen: Zu Ehren von Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann (Mohr Siebeck 2016) 43–62.Google Scholar
Günther, Klaus, “Normative Legal Pluralism – A Critique” in Zamora, Jorge Luis Fabra (ed) Jurisprudence in a Globalised World (Edward Elgar 2020) 85–99.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W, “Introduction” in Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W Cambridge University Press 1998 [Kritik der reinen Vernunft Johann Friedrich Hartknoch 1781/1787]) 1–80.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T, “Against Consent” (2012) 52 (4) Virginia Journal of International Law 747–790.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T and Hsiang, Jerome, “Reinvigorating Customary International Law” in Bradley, Curtis A (ed) Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 275–304.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan, “The Legitimacy of Metaphysics: Kant’s Legacy to Peirce, and Peirce’s to Philosophy Today” (2008) 36 (1) Philosophical Topics 97–100.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Wahrheitstheorien” in Fahrenbach, Helmut (ed) Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag (Neske 1973) 211–265.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “What Is Universal Pragmatics?” in Jürgen Habermas, On the Pragmatics of Communication (edited by Cooke, Maeve MIT Press 1976 [“Was heißt Universalpragmatik?” in Karl-Otto Apel (ed) Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie Suhrkamp (1976) 174–272]) 21–103.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Communication and the Evolution of Society (Beacon Press 1979).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, The Theory of Communicative Action. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason Vol 2 (translated by Thomas McCarthy Polity Press 1987 [Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Band 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft Suhrkamp 3rd ed 1985]).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Discourse Ethics: Notes on Philosophical Justification” in Jürgen Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (MIT Press 1990) 43–115.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Die postnationale Konstellation (Suhrkamp 1998).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Truth and Justification (translated by Barbara Fultner MIT Press 2003 [Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Philosophische Aufsätze Suhrkamp 1999]).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus (Suhrkamp 2004).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Die Krise der Europäischen Union im Lichte einer Konstitutionalisierung des Völkerrechts – Ein Essay zur Verfassung Europas” (2012) 72 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 1–44.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Interview with Jürgen Habermas” in Bächtiger, Andre et al (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy (Oxford University Press 2018) 871–882.Google Scholar
Hacker, Peter M S, “The Linguistic Turn in Analytical Philosophy” in Beaney, Michael (ed) The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford University Press 2013) 926–947.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Daniel, “Local, Global and Plural Constitutionalism: Europe Meets the World” in de Búrca, Graínne and Weiler, Joseph H H (eds) The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2012) 150–202.Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, “The Hungarian Constitutional Court and Constitutional Identity” (January 10, 2017) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/the-hungarian-constitutional-court-and-constitutional-identity/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, “A Coup against Constitutional Democracy. The Case of Hungary” in Graber, Mark A, Levinson, Sanford and Tushnet, Mark (eds) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) 243–256.Google Scholar
Halper, Edward, Aristotle’s Metaphysics: A Reader’s Guide (Continuum 2012).Google Scholar
Hamlin, J Kiley, “The Case for Social Evaluation in Preverbal Infants: Gazing Toward One’s Goal Drives Infants’ Preferences for Helpers over Hinderers in the Hill Paradigm” (2015) 5 (1563) Frontiers in Psychology 1–9.Google Scholar
Hamlin, J Kiley, Wynn, Karen and Bloom, Paul, “3-Month-Olds Show a Negativity Bias in Their Social Evaluations” (2010) 13 (6) Developmental Science 923–929.Google Scholar
Hanley, Seán and Vachudová, Milada Anna, “Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic” (2018) 34 (3) East European Politics 276–296.Google Scholar
Hanna, Robert, “Kant’s Theory of Judgment” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (October 23, 2017), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-judgment/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, “Does Marc Hauser’s Moral Minds Plagiarize John Mikhail’s Earlier Work?,” formerly available at www.princeton.edu/~harman/Mikhail%20and%20Hauser.pdf [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Harris, J W, Legal Philosophies (Butterworths 1997).Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L A, “Are There Any Natural Rights?” (1955) 64 (2) Philosophical Review 175–191.Google Scholar
Hartley, Trevor C, “National Law, International Law and EU Law – How Do They Relate?” in Capps, Patrick, Evans, Malcolm and Konstadinidis, Stratos (eds) Asserting Jurisdiction. International and European Legal Approaches (Hart 2003) 65–81.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Moritz, “Review Essay: ‘Lost in Disordered Clouds: Transnational Legal Pluralism and the Regulation of Global Asymmetries’ – Mireille Delmas‐Marty’s Ordering Pluralism” (2009) 11 (9) German Law Journal 1025–1037.Google Scholar
Hatje, Armin and Mankowski, Peter, “Nationale Unionsrechte. Sprachgrenzen, Traditionsgrenzen, Systemgrenzen, Denkgrenzen” (2014) 49 (2) Europarecht 155–169.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc D, Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (Ecco 2006).Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc D, “Response to Gil Harman’s ‘Did Marc Hauser’s Moral Minds Plagiarize John Mikhail’s Earlier Work?’,” formerly available at www.princeton.edu/~harman/HauserResponse_Harman%20essay.pdf [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Hauser, Oliver P et al, “Cooperating with the Future” (2014) 511 (7508) Nature 220–223.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Die Differenz des Fichteschen und Schellingschen Systems der Philosophie (Jena (Akademische Buchhandlung) 1801).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Glauben und Wissen oder Reflexionsphilosophie der Subjektivität in der Vollständigkeit ihrer Formen als Kantische, Jacobische und Fichtesche Philosophie (Cotta 1802).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Nicolai 1821).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline Part I Science of Logic (translated and edited by Brinkmann, Klaus and Dahlstrom, Daniel O Cambridge University Press 2010 [Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften I 1830]).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, The Science of Logic (translated by George di Giovanni Cambridge University Press 2010 [Wissenschaft der Logik 1832]).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, The Phenomenology of Spirit (translated by Terry Pinkard Cambridge University Press 2018 from Phenomenologie des Geistes 1807].Google Scholar
Heidemann, Carsten, Die Norm als Tatsache: Zur Normentheorie Hans Kelsens (Nomos 1997).Google Scholar
Heis, Jeremy, “Neo-Kantianism” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (May 18, 2018), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neo-kantianism/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, International Law, Politics and Values (Brill 1995).Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, “Elements of Constitutionalism” (1998) 60 (11) Special Issue of International Commission of Jurists. The Review 11–22.Google Scholar
Hilpold, Peter, “EU Law and UN Law in Conflict: The Kadi Case” (2009) 13 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 141–182.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (Three-Text Edition of Thomas Hobbes’s Political Theory. The Elements of Law, De Cive and Leviathan edited by Baumgold, Deborah Cambridge University Press 2017 [1651]).Google Scholar
Hobson, Jessica A and Hobson, R Peter, “Identification: The Missing Link between Joint Attention and Imitation?” (2007) 19 (2) Development and Psychopathology 411–431.Google Scholar
Hobson, R Peter and Hobson, Jessica, “Joint Attention or Joint Engagement? Insights from Autism” in Seemann, Alex (ed) Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience (MIT Press 2011) 115–136.Google Scholar
Hoerster, Norbert, Was ist Recht? Grundfragen der Rechtsphilosophie (CH Beck 2006).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tamás, “The Gentle Humanizer of Humanitarian Law: Antonio Cassese and the Creation of the Customary Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts” in Stahn, Carsten and van den Herik, Larissa (eds) Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (Asser Press 2010) 58–80.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, Frank, “The Contribution of EU Practice to International Law” in Cremona, Marise (ed) Developments in EU External Relations Law (Oxford University Press 2008) 37–127.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, Frank, “Article 14” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (Springer 2nd ed 2018).Google Scholar
Horsley, Thomas, The Court of Justice of the European Union as an Institutional Actor. Judicial Lawmaking and Its Limits (Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Horton, John, Political Obligation (Macmillan 1992).Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul, “A Defense of Minimalism” in Lynch, Michael P (ed) The Nature of Truth. Classic and Contemporary Perspectives (MIT Press 2001) 559–578.Google Scholar
Hösle, Vittorio, Hegels System. Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität Vol 1: Systementwicklung und Logik (Felix Meiner 1st ed 1987).Google Scholar
Hösle, Vittorio, Die Krise der Gegenwart und die Verantwortung der Philosophie. Transzendentalpragmatik, Letztbegründung, Ethik (CH Beck 3rd ed 1997).Google Scholar
Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer, Mothers and Others (Harvard University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Huber, Peter M, “Interview Das EZB-Urteil war zwingend” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung May 12, 2020.Google Scholar
Huber, Peter M and Paulus, Andreas L, “Cooperation of Constitutional Courts in Europe: The Openness of the German Constitution to International, European, and Comparative Constitutional Law” in Andenas, Mads and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds) Courts and Comparative Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 281–299.Google Scholar
Hübl, Philipp, Die aufgeregte Gesellschaft. Wie Emotionen unsere Moral prägen und die Polarisierung verstärken (C Bertelsmann 2019).Google Scholar
Hubley, Penelope and Trevarthen, Colwyn, “Sharing a Task in Infancy” (1979) 4 Social Interaction during Infancy: New Directions for Child Development 57–80.Google Scholar
Hudson, William D (ed), The Is–Ought Problem. A Collection of Papers on the Central Problem in Moral Philosophy (Penguin 1969).Google Scholar
Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature. A Critical Edition Vol 1 (edited by Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary J Oxford University Press 2007 [1739–1740]).Google Scholar
Hume, David, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (edited with an introduction and notes by Millican, Peter Oxford University Press 2007 [1748]).Google Scholar
Hummer, Waldemar, “Art 218” in Vedder, Christoph and von Heinegg, Wolff Heintschel (eds) Europäisches Unionsrecht. Handkommentar (Nomos et al 2nd ed 2018).Google Scholar
Husa, Jaako, “Global Constitutionalism – Some Critical Remarks” (2017) 47 (1) Hong Kong Law Journal 73–88.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology (Martinus Nijhoff 1960 [originally published as Méditations cartésiennes: Introduction à la phénoménologie 1931]).Google Scholar
Isak, Hubert, “Kompetenzüberschreitende Akte von Organen der Europäischen Union – Die Sicht des österreichischen Verfassungsrechts” in Simma, Bruno and Schulte, Constanze (eds) Völker- und Europarecht in der aktuellen Diskussion (Linde 1999) 33–58.Google Scholar
Isensee, Josef, “Ethische Grundwerte im freiheitlichen Staat” in Paus, Ansgar (ed) Werte – Rechte – Normen (Kevelaer et al 1979) 132.Google Scholar
Isiksel, Turkuler, “Global Legal Pluralism as Fact and Norm” (2013) 2 (2) Global Constitutionalism 160–195.Google Scholar
Itzcovich, Giulio, “The Interpretation of Community Law by the European Court of Justice” (2009) 10 (5) German Law Journal 537–560.Google Scholar
Iwasawa, Yuji, “The Doctrine of Self-Executing Treaties in the United States: A Critical Analysis” (1986) 26 Virginia Journal of International Law 627–692.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich, “Ueber den transscendentalen Idealismus” in Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, Werke Vol 2 (edited by Roth, F and Köppen, F 1976 [1787]) 291–310.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich, “David Hume on Faith or Idealism and Realism: A Dialogue” in di Giovanni, George (ed) The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill. Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (translated with an introductory study, notes and bibliography by George di Giovanni McGill-Queen’s University Press 1994 [1787]) 253–338.Google Scholar
Jacot-Guillarmod, Olivier, Droit communautaire et droit international public. Etude des sources internationales de l’ordre juridique des Communautés européennes (Librairie de l’Université Genève 1979).Google Scholar
Jakab, András, “Kelsens Völkerrechtslehre zwischen Erkenntnistheorie und Politik” (2004) 64 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 1045–1057.Google Scholar
Jakab, András, “Problems of the Stufenbaulehre: Kelsen’s Failure to Derive the Validity of a Norm from Another Norm” (2007) 20 (1) Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 35–67.Google Scholar
Jakab, András, European Constitutional Language (Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Jakab, András, “Informal Institutional Elements as Both Preconditions and Consequences of Effective Formal Legal Rules: The Failure of Constitutional Institution Building in Hungary” (2020) 68 (4) American Journal of Comparative Law 760–800.Google Scholar
Jakab, András and Sonnevend, Pal, “The Bundesbank Is under a Legal Obligation to Ignore the PSPP Judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht” (May 25, 2020) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/the-bundesbank-is-under-a-legal-obligation-to-ignore-the-pspp-judgment-of-the-bundesverfassungsgericht/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Jaklic, Klemen, Constitutional Pluralism in the EU (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
James, William, “Pragmatism’s Conception of Truth” in Lynch, Michael P (ed) The Nature of Truth. Classic and Contemporary Perspectives (MIT Press 2001 [1907]) 211–228.Google Scholar
James, William, The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to “Pragmatism” in William James, Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth (edited with an introduction by Ayer, Alfred J Harvard University Press 1978 [1909]).Google Scholar
Janko, Andreas, Gesamtänderung der Bundesverfassung (Verlag Österreich 2004).Google Scholar
Jellinek, Georg, Die rechtliche Natur der Staatenverträge (A Hölder 1880).Google Scholar
Jenks, Wilfried C, “The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties” (1953) 30 British Yearbook of International Law 401–453.Google Scholar
Jennings, Robert Y, “What Is International Law and How Do We Tell It When We See It?” (1981) 37 Annuaire Suisse de Droit International 59–88.Google Scholar
Jennings, Robert Y and Watts, Arthur, Oppenheim’s International Law (Oxford University Press 9th ed 1992).Google Scholar
Jestaedt, Matthias, “Der Europäische Verfassungsverbund – Verfassungstheoretischer Charme und rechtstheoretische Insuffizienz einer Unschärferelation” in Krause, Rüdiger, Veelken, Winfried and Vieweg, Klaus (eds) Recht der Wirtschaft und der Arbeit in Europa: Gedächtnisschrift für Wolfgang Blomeyer (Duncker & Humblot 2004) 637–674, reprinted in Christian Calliess (ed) Verfassungswandel im europäischen Staaten- und Verfassungsverbund. Beiträge der Ersten Göttinger Gespräche zum deutschen und europäischen Verfassungsrecht vom 15. bis 17. Juni 2006 (Mohr Siebeck 2007) 93–128.Google Scholar
Jeutner, Valentin, Irresolvable Norm Conflicts in International Law – The Concept of a Legal Dilemma (Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Jovanović, Miodrag A, The Nature of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Jung, Florian, “Reben, Wein und der EuGH: Zur Auslegung von Art. 218 Abs. 9 AEUV – Anmerkungen zum Urteil des EuGH vom 07.10.2014, Rs. C-399/12 – Deutschland/Rat” (2015) 50 (6) Europarecht 735–745.Google Scholar
Kaddous, Christine, “L’arrêt France c. Commission de 1994 (accord concurrence) et le contrôle de la ‘légalité’ des accords externes en vertu de l’art. 173 CE: la difficile réconciliation de l’orthodoxie communautaire avec l’orthodoxie internationale” (1996) 32 Cahiers de droit européen 613–633.Google Scholar
Kadelbach, Stefan, “Konstitutionalisierung und Rechtspluralismus – Über die Konkurrenz zweier Ordnungsentwürfe” in Bung, Jochen and Engländer, Armin (eds) Souveränität, Transstaatlichkeit und Weltverfassung ARSP-Beiheft 153 (Franz Steiner 2017) 97–108.Google Scholar
Kadens, Emily and Young, Ernest A, “How Customary Is Customary International Law?” (2013) 54 (3) William & Mary Law Review 885–920.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, Fast and Slow (Penguin 2012).Google Scholar
Kaiser, Karen, “Treaties, Direct Applicability” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg, “Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems” (2004) 15 (3) European Journal of International Law 523–553.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg, “Kelsen – Which Kelsen? A Reapplication of the Pure Theory to International Law” (2009) 22 (2) Leiden Journal of International Law 225–249.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg, Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (Routledge 2011).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science (edited and translated by Hatfield, Gary Cambridge University Press 2nd ed 2004 [Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können 1783]).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W Cambridge University Press 1998 [Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Johann Friedrich Hartknoch 1781/1787)]).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Über den Gemeinspruch: “Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis” (Berlinische Monatsschrift 1793).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Metaphysics of Morals: Doctrine of Virtue Vol I and Doctrine of Right Vol II (edited and translated by Gregor, Mary J Cambridge University Press 1997 [Die Metaphysik der Sitten: Tugendlehre und Rechtslehre 1797]).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (1797).Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Hermann, The Definition of Law (Cambridge University Press 1958).Google Scholar
Karl, Wolfram, “Conflicts between Treaties” in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed) Encyclopedia of Public International Law Vol VII (North-Holland 1984) 467–473.Google Scholar
Keleman, R Daniel, “On the Unsustainability of Constitutional Pluralism: European Supremacy and the Survival of the Eurozone” (2016) 23 (1) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 136–150.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R Daniel and Pech, Laurent, “Why Autocrats Love Constitutional Identity and Constitutional Pluralism. Lessons from Hungary and Poland” (2018) 2 RECONNECT working paper.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R Daniel and Pech, Laurent, “The Uses and Abuses of Constitutional Pluralism: Undermining the Rule of Law in the Name of Constitutional Identity in Hungary and Poland” (2019) 21 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 59–74.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts (Mohr Siebeck 1920).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre (Scientia 2nd ed 1923).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Allgemeine Staatslehre (Springer 1925).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “Les rapports de système entre le droit interne et le droit international public” (1926) 14 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 227–331.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “Die Bundesexekution – Ein Beitrag zur Theorie und Praxis des Bundesstaates, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der deutschen Reichs- und der österreichischen Bundes-Verfassung” in Giacometti, Zaccaria and Schindler, Dietrich (eds) Festgabe für Fritz Fleiner zum 60. Geburtstag (J C B Mohr 1927) 127–187.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts: Beitrag zu einer Reinen Rechtslehre (J C B Mohr 2nd ed 1928).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre (Franz Deuticke 1934).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “Théorie du Droit International Coutumier” (1939) 1 (NS) Revue International de la Théorie du Droit 253–274.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Law and Peace in International Relations. The Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures 1940–41 (Harvard University Press 1942).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (translated by Anders Wedberg Harvard University Press 1945 [1928]).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Natural Law Doctrine and Legal Positivism (translated by Wolfgang Herbert Kraus as an appendix to Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State Harvard University Press 1945) 389–446.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Philosophical Foundations of Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism (translated by Wolfgang H Kraus as an appendix to Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State Harvard University Press 1945 [1928]) 389–445.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (Rinehart 1952).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “Der Begriff der Rechtsordnung” (1958) 1 (3) Logique et Analyse 150–167.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “Die Einheit von Völkerrecht und staatlichem Recht” (1958) 19 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 234–248.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre (Franz Deuticke 2nd ed 1960).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (Rinehart 2nd ed 1966).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law (University of California Press 2nd ed 1967).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Allgemeine Theorie der Normen (Manz 1979).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory (translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L Paulson Oxford Clarendon Press 1992 [Reine Rechtslehre 1934]).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “The Pure Theory of Law, ‘Labandism’, and Neo-Kantianism: A Letter to Renato Treves” in Paulson, Stanley L and Litschewski Paulson, Bonnie (eds) Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes (Clarendon Press 1998) 169–175.Google Scholar
Keverne, Eric B, “Genomic Imprinting and the Evolution of Sex Differences in Mammalian Reproductive Strategies” (2007) 59 Advances in Genetics 217–243.Google Scholar
Keverne, Eric B and Curley, James P, “Vasopressin, Oxytocin and Social Behaviour” (2004) 14 (6) Current Opinion in Neurobiology 777–783.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (Palgrave Macmillan 1936).Google Scholar
Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Die deutschen Staatsgrenzen. Rechtshistorische Grundlagen und offene Rechtsfragen (Mohr Siebeck 2004).Google Scholar
Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Das Rote Kreuz: Geschichte einer humanitären Weltbewegung (CH Beck 2013).Google Scholar
Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, “Territory Taking Centre Stage in International Law. Some Preliminary Thoughts on the Rise of Territoriality to the Bedrock of Modern Statehood” in Société Française pour le droit international (ed) Droit des Frontières internationals / The Law of International Borders (Pedone 2016) 53–64.Google Scholar
Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, “Art 216” in Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus and Kotzur, Markus (eds) EUV/AEUV (CH Beck 6th ed 2017) 795–801.Google Scholar
Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, “Das Staatsgebiet und die Grenzen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland” in Kahl, Wolfgang, Waldhoff, Christian and Walter, Christian (eds) Bonner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz (C F Müller 2022) 1–228.Google Scholar
Khan, Daniel-Erasmus and Kirchmair, Lando, “Art 216” in Geiger, Rudolf et al (eds) EUV/AEUV (CH Beck 7th ed 2023) 868–875.Google Scholar
Kieber, Stefan and Klaushofer, Reinhard, “The Austrian Constitutional Court Post Case-Law after the Landmark Decision on Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union” (2017) 23 (2) European Public Law 221–236.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, “Confronting Difference: The Puzzling Durability of Gentili’s Combination of Pragmatic Pluralism and Normative Judgment” (1998) 92 American Journal of International Law 713–723.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “The ‘Janus Face’ of the Court of Justice of the European Union: A Theoretical Appraisal of the EU Legal Order’s Relationship with International and Member State Law” (2012) 4 (3) Goettingen Journal of International Law 677–691.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “Die autonome Rechtsordnung der EU und die Grenzen von Monismus und Dualismus” in Kettemann, Matthias C (ed) Grenzen im Völkerrecht – Grenzen des Völkerrechts (Jan Sramek 2013) 275–291.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, Die Theorie des Rechtserzeugerkreises. Eine rechtstheoretische Untersuchung des Verhältnisses von Völkerrecht zu Staatsrecht am Beispiel der österreichischen Rechtsordnung (Duncker & Humblot 2013).Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “Is the EU Legal Order the Tombstone of the Dualistic and the Monistic Doctrine?” in Thaler, Michael and Verpeaux, Michel (eds) La recherche en droit constitutionnel comparé (L’Harmattan 2014) 71–86.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “The Theory of the Law Creators’ Circle: Re-Conceptualizing the Monism–Dualism–Pluralism Debate” (2016) 17 (2) German Law Journal 179–214.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “Ist Art. 59 Abs. 2 GG tatsächlich dualistisch? Ein Beitrag zur Stärkung der innerstaatlichen Wirkung völkerrechtlicher Verträge und gleichzeitig einer stärkeren Einbindung der Legislative auf völkerrechtlicher Ebene” (2017) 72 (3) Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 515–547.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “Morality between Nativism and Behaviorism. (Innate) Intersubjectivity as a Response to John Mikhail’s ‘Universal Moral Grammar’” (2017) 37 (4) Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 230–260.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “What Came First: The Obligation or the Belief? A Renaissance of Consensus Theory to Make the Normative Foundations of Customary International Law More Tangible” (2017) 59 German Yearbook of International Law 289–319.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “Who Has the Final Say? The Relationship between International, EU and National Law” (2018) 10 European Journal of Legal Studies 47–100.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “Descriptive vs Prescriptive (Global) Legal Pluralism: A Gentle Reminder of David Hume’s Is–Ought Divide” (2019) 51 (1) Journal of Global Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 48–71.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “How (Not) to Argue for the Relation between Natural Sciences and Law: Why the Thesis of an Innate ‘Universal Moral Grammar’ and Its Relevance for Law as Argued by John Mikhail Fails” (2019) 105 (4) Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 523–535.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “Europäische Souveränität? Zur Autonomie des Unionsrechts im Verhältnis zum Völkerrecht sowie den Mitgliedstaaten am Beispiel der Corona Krise” (2021) 56 (1) Europarecht 28–39.Google Scholar
Kirchmair, Lando, “Nationale Souveränität als Verfassungsidentität. Warum der EuGH Letztentscheider über den Gehalt nationaler Identität sein sollte” (2021) 73 (8) Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 321–326.Google Scholar
Kirgis, Frederick L, “Custom on a Sliding Scale” (1987) 81 (1) American Journal of International Law 146–151.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, The European Union in International Law (Editions A Pedone 2012).Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, “Straddling the Fence: The EU and International Law” in Arnull, Anthony and Chalmers, Damian (eds) The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2017) 52–71.Google Scholar
Klamert, Marcus, The Principle of Loyalty in EU Law (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Klaushofer, Reinhard and Palmstorfer, Rainer, “Austrian Constitutional Court Uses Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as Standard of Review: Effects on Union Law” (2013) 19 (1) European Public Law 1–11.Google Scholar
Kleinlein, Thomas, Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht (Springer 2012).Google Scholar
Kleinlein, Thomas, “Neue starke Stimme in der europäischen Grundrechts-Polyphonie” (December 1, 2019) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/neue-starke-stimme-in-der-europaeischen-grundrechts-polyphonie/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Knauff, Matthias, Der Regelungsverbund: Recht und Soft Law im Mehrebenensystem (Mohr Siebeck 2010).Google Scholar
Köck, Heribert-Franz, “Der erste Staatszweck in einer pluralistischen Gesellschaft” in Miehsler, Herbert et al (eds) Ius Humanitas. Festschrift zum 90. Geburtstag von Alfred Verdross (Duncker & Humblot 1980) 87.Google Scholar
Koffka, Kurt, Principles of Gestalt Psychology (Harcourt-Brace 1935).Google Scholar
Köhnke, Klaus Christian, Entstehung und Aufstieg des Neukantianismus. Die deutsche Universitätsphilosophie zwischen Idealismus und Positivismus (Suhrkamp 1993).Google Scholar
Kokott, Juliane and Sobotta, Christoph, “The Kadi Case – Constitutional Core Values and International Law – Finding the Balance?” (2012) 23 (4) European Journal of International Law 1015–1024.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, “Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law” (2003) 50 (2) Netherlands International Law Review 119–150.Google Scholar
Koller, Peter, Neue Theorien des Sozialkontrakts (Duncker & Humblot 1987).Google Scholar
Koller, Peter, “Meilensteine des Rechtspositivismus im 20. Jahrhundert: Hans Kelsens Reine Rechtslehre und H. L. A. Harts ‘Concept of Law’” in Weinberger, Ota and Krawietz, Werner (eds) Reine Rechtslehre im Spiegel ihrer Fortsetzer und Kritiker (Springer 1988) 129–178.Google Scholar
Komárek, Jan, “Playing with Matches: The Czech Constitutional Court Declares a Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU Ultra Vires; Judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12, Slovak Pensions XVII” (2012) 8 (1) European Constitutional Law Review 323–337.Google Scholar
Konstadinides, Theodore, “When in Europe: Customary International Law and EU Competences in the Sphere of External Action” (2012) 13 (11) German Law Journal 1177–1201.Google Scholar
Kopelmans, Lazare, “Custom as a Means of the Creation of International Law” (1937) 18 British Yearbook of International Law 127–151.Google Scholar
Kosař, David, Baroš, Jiří and Dufek, Pavel, “The Twin Challenges to Separation of Powers in Central Europe: Technocratic Governance and Populism” (2019) 15 (3) European Constitutional Law Review 427–461.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “The Pull of the Mainstream” (1990) 88 (6) Michigan Law Review 1946–1962.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations (Cambridge University Press 2001).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “Chairman of the Study Group of the ILC on Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law” (2006) Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682.Google Scholar
Köster, Moritz et al, “Cultural Influences on Toddlers’ Prosocial Behavior: How Maternal Task Assignment Relates to Helping Others” (2016) 87 (6) Child Development 1727–1738.Google Scholar
Koutrakos, Panos, EU International Relations Law (Hart 2nd ed 2015).Google Scholar
Koutrakos, Panos, “Institutional Balance and the Duty of Cooperation in Treaty-Making under EU Law” (2018) 68 (1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1–33.Google Scholar
Koutrakos, Panos, “The European Union” in Bowman, Michael J and Kritsiotis, Dino (eds) Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (Cambridge University Press 2018) 933–965.Google Scholar
Krabbe, Hugo, Die moderne Staatsidee (Nijhoff 2nd ed 1919).Google Scholar
Kraft, Victor, Erkenntnislehre (Springer 1960).Google Scholar
Kramer, Matthew H, “Legal and Moral Obligation” in Golding, Martin P and Edmundson, William A (eds) The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Blackwell 2005) 179–190.Google Scholar
Krijnen, Christian, “‘Back to Kant’: Neo-Kantianism” in Banham, Gary, Schulting, Dennis and Hems, Nigel (eds) The Bloomsbury Companion to Kant (Bloomsbury 2nd ed 2015) 318–324.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, “Who Is Afraid of Radical Pluralism? Legal Order and Political Stability in the Postnational Space” (2011) 24 (4) Ratio Juris 386–412.Google Scholar
Kristoferitsch, Gisela, “The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Be Treated like Constitutional Law. Austrian Constitutional Court Judgment of 14 March 2012, U 466/11 et al” (2013) 7 (1) Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 88–92.Google Scholar
Krönke, Christoph, Die Verfahrensautonomie der Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union (Mohr Siebeck 2013).Google Scholar
Krunke, Helle, “The Danish Lisbon Judgment: Danish Supreme Court, Case 199/2012, Judgment of 20 February 2013” (2014) 10 (3) European Constitutional Law Review 542–570.Google Scholar
Krunke, Helle, “Impact of the EU/EEA on the Nordic Constitutional Systems” in Krunke, Helle and Thorarensen, Björg (eds) The Nordic Constitutions. A Comparative and Contextual Study (Hart 2018) 167–202.Google Scholar
Krunke, Helle and Klinge, Sune, “The Danish Ajos Case: The Missing Case from Maastricht and Lisbon” (2018) 3 (1) European Papers 157–182.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin, “Institutionalisation and Its Trials. (Anti-)Constitutional Populism in Post-Communist Europe” (2019) 15 (3) European Constitutional Law Review 544–573.Google Scholar
Kuijper, Pieter Jan, “Customary International Law, Decisions of International Organisations and Other Techniques for Ensuring Respect for International Legal Rules in European Community Law” in Wouters, Jan, Nollkaemper, André and de Wet, Erika (eds) The Europeanisation of International Law (T M C Asser Press 2008) 87–106.Google Scholar
Kuijper, Pieter Jan, “The European Courts and the Law of Treaties: The Continuing Story” in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed) The Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press 2011) 256–278.Google Scholar
Kuijper, Pieter Jan, “The Case Law of the Court of Justice and the Allocation of External Relations Powers: Whither the Traditional Role of the Executive in EU Foreign Relations?” in Cremona, Marise and Thies, Anne (eds) The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law – Constitutional Challenges (Hart 2016) 95–114.Google Scholar
Kuijper, Pieter Jan, “The Court and the New EU Foreign Relations Law: Institutional Balance?” in Czuczai, Jenő and Naert, Frederik (eds) The EU as a Global Actor – Bridging Legal Theory and Practice: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Ricardo Gosalbo Bono (Brill Nijhoff 2017) 48–64.Google Scholar
Kuisma, Mirka and Larik, Joris, “The Continuing Contestation of ERTA. Conferral, Effectiveness and the Member States’ Participation in Mixed Agreements” in Levrat, Nicolas et al (eds) The EU and Its Member States’ Joint Participation in International Agreements (Hart 2022) 43–58.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias, “Who Is the Final Arbiter of Constitutionality in Europe? Three Conceptions of the Relationship between the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice” (1999) 36 (2) Common Market Law Review 351–386.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias, “The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis” (2004) 15 (5) European Journal of International Law 907–931.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias, “The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty” (2005) 11 (3) European Law Journal 262–307.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias, “The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between National Constitutional Law and Constitutionalism beyond the State” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P (eds) Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press 2009) 258–325.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias, “The Moral Point of Constitutional Pluralism” in Dickson, Julie and Eleftheriadis, Pavlos (eds) Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 216–246.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias, “Rebel Without a Good Cause: Karlsruhe’s Misguided Attempt to Draw the CJEU into a Game of ‘Chicken’ and What the CJEU Might Do about It” (2014) 15 (2) German Law Journal 203–215.Google Scholar
Kunz, Josef L, Völkerrechtswissenschaft und Reine Rechtslehre (Deuticke 1923).Google Scholar
Kunz, Josef L, “La primauté de droit des gens” (1925) 6 Revue de droit international et de législation comparé 556–598.Google Scholar
Kunz, Josef L, “On the Theoretical Basis of the Law of Nations” (1925) 10 Transactions of the Grotius Society 115–142.Google Scholar
Lachmayer, Konrad, “The Constitution of Austria in International Constitutional Networks: Pluralism, Dialogues and Diversity” in Albi, Anneli and Bardutzky, Samo (eds) National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, the Rule of Law. National Reports (Springer 2019) 1271–1322.Google Scholar
Langan, Christopher M, The Art of Knowing: Expositions on Free Will and Selected Essays (Mega Press 2002).Google Scholar
Larik, Joris, Foreign Policy Objectives in European Constitution (Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Lask, Emil, Rechtsphilosophie in Emil Lask, Gesammelte Schriften Vol 1 (Paul Siebeck 1923).Google Scholar
Laurence, Stephen and Margolis, Eric, “The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument” (2001) 52 (2) British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 217–276.Google Scholar
Laurer, Hans René, “Europarecht und österreichische Rechtsordnung – Rechsnormen in einem einheitlichen Stufenbau? – Ein ‘Vorwort’” (1997) 52 (21) Österreichische Juristenzeitung 801–810.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, David, “(Dis)solving the Chronological Paradox in Customary International Law: A Hartian Approach” (2008) 21 (1) Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 128–148.Google Scholar
Legrain, Leon, Cleeremans, Axel and Destrebecqz, Arnaud, “Distinguishing Three Levels in Explicit Self-Awareness” (2011) 20 (3) Consciousness and Cognition 578–585.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen, “Kooperation und Spannung im Verhältnis von EuGH und Verfassungsgerichten” (2015) 50 (1) Europarecht 3–27.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen, “The Rule of Law and the Constitutional Identity of the European Union” (March 5, 2023) part of the speech delivered by the president of the CJUE Koen Lenaerts on February 17, 2023 at the conference organized by the Bulgarian Association for European Law in Sofia, available at https://evropeiskipravenpregled.eu/the-rule-of-law-and-the-constitutional-identity-of-the-european-union/#_ftnref49 [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen and Gutiérrez-Fons, José A, “To Say What the Law of the EU Is: Methods of Interpretation and the European Court of Justice” EUI Working Paper AEL 2013/9, available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/28339/AEL_2013_09_DL.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen, Gutiérrez-Fons, José A and Adam, Stanislas, “Exploring the Autonomy of the European Union Legal Order” (2021) 81 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 47–87.Google Scholar
Lepard, Brian D, Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Implications (Cambridge University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Lepard, Brian D, “Customary International Law as a Dynamic Process” in Bradley, Curtis A (ed) Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 62–94.Google Scholar
Lepper, Mark R, Greene, David and Nisbett, Richard E, “Undermining Children’s Intrinsic Interest with Extrinsic Rewards: A Test of the ‘Overjustification’ Hypothesis” (1973) 28 (1) Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 129–137.Google Scholar
Lessnoff, Michael (ed), Social Contract Theory (New York University Press 1990).Google Scholar
Levrat, Nicolas et al (eds), The EU and Its Member States’ Joint Participation in International Agreements (Hart 2022).Google Scholar
Liebmann, Otto, Kant und die Epigonen (Carl Schober 1865).Google Scholar
Lindahl, Lars and Reidhav, David, “Conflict of Legal Norms: Definition and Varieties” in Araszkiewicz, Michał and Płeszka, Krzysztof (eds) Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking (Springer 2015) 49–96.Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, “The Creation of Jus Cogens: Making Sense of Article 53 of the Vienna Convention” (2011) 71 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 359–378.Google Scholar
Lock, Tobias, The European Court of Justice and International Courts (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government (Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration edited by Shapiro, Ian Yale University Press 2003 [1690]).Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton and Taber, Charles, The Rationalizing Voter (Cambridge University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Lohmann, Friedrich, Karl Barth und der Neukantianismus. Die Rezeption des Neukantianismus im “Römerbrief” und ihre Bedeutung für die weitere Ausarbeitung der Theologie Karl Barths (De Gruyter 1995).Google Scholar
Lohmann, Friedrich, “‘Ethische Unruhe’. Die Funktion von Ethik bei der gesellschaftlichen Ordnungsbildung” in Pelizäus, Helga and Nieder, Ludwig (eds) Das Risiko – Gedanken übers und ins Ungewisse. Interdisziplinäre Aushandlungen des Risikophänomens im Lichte der Reflexiven Moderne. Eine Festschrift für Wolgang Bonß (Springer 2019) 95–125.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, “Constitutional Pluralism: An Oxymoron?” (2014) 3 (1) Global Constitutionalism 9–30.Google Scholar
Low, Jason and Perner, Josef, “Implicit and Explicit Theory of Mind: State of the Art” (2012) 30 (1) British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1–13.Google Scholar
Lüddecke, Dirk, “Erstlingswerk: Der Konservatismus eines Radikalen. David Hume als Anatom politischer Loyalität” in Lüddecke, Dirk and Englmann, Felicia (eds) Zur Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Denkweisen von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart (J B Metzler 2014) 168–190.Google Scholar
Luf, Gerhard, “Zur Problematik des Wertbegriffes in der Rechtsphilosophie” in Miehsler, Herbert et al (eds) Ius Humanitas. Festschrift zum 90. Geburtstag von Alfred Verdross (Duncker & Humblot 1980) 127–146.Google Scholar
Luf, Gerhard, “On the Transcendental Import of Kelsen’s Basic Norm” in Paulson, Stanley L and Litschewski-Paulson, Bonnie (eds) Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes (Oxford Clarendon Press 1998) 221–234.Google Scholar
Luft, Sebastian, “Introduction: Hermann Cohen (1842–1918)” in Luft, Sebastian (ed) The Neo-Kantian Reader (Routledge 2015) 93–100.Google Scholar
Luft, Sebastian (ed), The Neo-Kantian Reader (Routledge 2015).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie (Suhrkamp 1984).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Rechtssoziologie (Westdeutscher Verlag 3rd ed 1987).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Suhrkamp 1993).Google Scholar
Macarthur, David, “Naturalism and Skepticism” in De Caro, Mario and Macarthur, David (eds) Naturalism in Question (Harvard University Press 2004) 106–124.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, “Beyond the Sovereign State” (1993) 56 (1) Modern Law Review 1–18.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, “The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now” (1995) 1 (3) European Law Journal 259–266.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, “Risking Constitutional Collision in Europe?” (1998) 18 (3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 517–532.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, Questioning Sovereignty. Law State and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford University Press 1999).Google Scholar
MacGibbon, Ian C, “Customary International Law and Acquiescence” (1958) 33 British Yearbook of International Law 115–145.Google Scholar
Maduro, Miguel Poiares, “The Heteronyms of European Law” (1999) 5 (2) European Law Journal 160–168.Google Scholar
Maduro, Miguel Poiares, “Contrapunctual Law: Europe’s Constitutional Pluralism in Action” in Walker, Neil (ed) Sovereignty in Transition (Hart 2003) 502–537.Google Scholar
Maduro, Miguel Poiares, “European Constitution: What if This Is as Good as It Gets?” in Weiler, Joseph H H and Wind, Marlene (eds) European Constitutionalism beyond the State (Cambridge University Press 2003) 74–102.Google Scholar
Maduro, Miguel Poiares, “Three Claims of Constitutional Pluralism” in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds) Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Hart 2012) 67–84.Google Scholar
Maher, Imelda, “The CILFIT Criteria Clarified and Extended for National Courts of Last Resort under Art. 267 TFEU” (2021) 7 (1) European Papers 265–274.Google Scholar
Mahlmann, Matthias, Rationalismus in der praktischen Theorie: Normentheorie und praktische Kompetenz (Nomos 2nd ed 2008).Google Scholar
Mahlmann, Matthias, “Mind and Rights: Neuroscience, Philosophy, and the Foundations of Legal Justice” in Sellers, Mortimer N (ed) Law, Reason, and Emotion (Cambridge University Press 2017) 80–137.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw, Crime and Custom in Savage Society (Kegan Paul 1926).Google Scholar
Mangoldt, Anna Katharina, Gemeinschaftsrecht und deutsches Recht. Die Europäisierung der deutschen Rechtsordnung in historisch-empirischer Sicht (Mohr Siebeck 2011).Google Scholar
Manin, Philippe, “The European Communities and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations” (1987) 24 (3) Common Market Law Review 457–481.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, “Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions: The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and Other Treaties” (2001) 35 (6) Journal of World Trade 1081–1131.Google Scholar
Marmor, Andrei, “The Pure Theory of Law” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (January 4, 2016), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lawphil-theory/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Martines, Francesca, “Direct Effect of International Agreements of the European Union” (2014) 25 (1) European Journal of International Law 129–147.Google Scholar
Matthews, H E, “Strawson on Transcendental Idealism” (1969) 19 (76) Philosophical Quarterly 204–220.Google Scholar
Mayer, Franz C, Kompetenzüberschreitung und Letztentscheidung. Das Maastricht-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und die Letztentscheidung über Ultra vires-Akte in Mehrebenensystemen. Eine rechtsvergleichende Betrachtung von Konflikten zwischen Gerichten am Beispiel der EU und der USA (CH Beck 2000).Google Scholar
Mayer, Franz C, “Verfassung im Nationalstaat: Von der Gesamtordnung zur europäischen Teilordnung?” (2016) 75 Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 7–63.Google Scholar
Mayer, Franz C, “Auf dem Weg zum Richterfaustrecht? Zum PSPP-Urteil des BVerfG” (May 7, 2020) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/auf-dem-weg-zum-richterfaustrecht/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Mayer, Heinz, “Rechtstheorie und Rechtspraxis” in Jabloner, Clemens and Stadler, Friedrich (eds) Logischer Empirismus und Reine Rechtslehre: Beziehungen zwischen dem Wiener Kreis und der Hans Kelsen Schule (Springer 2002) 319–331.Google Scholar
Mazzeschi, Riccardo P, “The Marginal Role of the Individual in the ILC’s Articles on State Responsibility” (2004) 14 Italian Yearbook of International Law 39–51.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas, The Critical Theory of Juergen Habermas (MIT Press 1978).Google Scholar
McDowell, John Henry, Having the World in View. Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars (Harvard University Press 2009).Google Scholar
McKee, Derek, “Review Essay – Emmanuel Melissaris’s Ubiquitous Law: Legal Theory and the Space for Legal Pluralism” (2010) 11 (5) German Law Journal 573–584.Google Scholar
Meadwell, Hudson, “The Foundations of Habermas’s Universal Pragmatics” (1994) 23 (5) Theory and Society 711–727.Google Scholar
Melissaris, Emmanuel, “The More the Merrier? A New Take on Legal Pluralism” (2004) 13 (1) Social & Legal Studies 57–79.Google Scholar
Melissaris, Emmanuel, Ubiquitous Law: Legal Theory and the Space for Legal Pluralism (Ashgate 2009).Google Scholar
Mendelson, Maurice H, “The Subjective Element in Customary International Law” (1996) 66 British Yearbook of International Law 177–208.Google Scholar
Mendez, Mario, The Legal Effects of EU Agreements. Maximalist Treaty Enforcement and Judicial Avoidance Techniques (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Merkl, Adolf J, “Hans Kelsens System einer reinen Rechtslehre” (1921) 41 Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 171–202.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, “Legal Pluralism” (1988) 22 (5) Law & Society Review 869–896.Google Scholar
Mesquita Ceia, Eleonora, Die verfassungsgerichtliche Kontrolle völkerrechtlicher Verträge. Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zwischen Brasilien und Europa (Nomos 2011).Google Scholar
Miasik, Dawid and Szwarc, Monika, “Primacy and Direct Effect – Still Together: Poplawski II” (2021) 58 (2) Common Market Law Review 571–590.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf, “Global Legal Pluralism” (2009) 5 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 243–262.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf, “On Liberalism and Legal Pluralism” in Maduro, Miguel, Tuori, Kaarlo and Sankari, Suvi (eds) Transnational Law: Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking (Cambridge University Press 2014) 122–142.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf, “Law and Recognition – Towards a Relational Concept of Law” in Roughan, Nicole and Halpin, Andrew (eds) In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press 2017) 90–115.Google Scholar
Michel, Nicolas, “L’imprégnation du droit étatique par l’ordre juridique international” in Thürer, Daniel, Aubert, Jean-François and Müller, Jörg Paul (eds) Verfassungsrecht der Schweiz (Schulthess 2001) 63–69.Google Scholar
Mikhail, John, “Universal Moral Grammar: Theory, Evidence and the Future” (2007) 11 (4) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 143–152.Google Scholar
Mikhail, John, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Mikhail, John, “Moral Grammar and Human Rights – Some Reflections on Cognitive Science and Enlightenment Rationalism” in Goodman, Ryan, Jinks, Derek and Woods, Andrew K (eds) Understanding Social Action, Promoting Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2012) 160–202.Google Scholar
Mikhail, John and Mahlmann, Matthias, “Cognitive Science, Ethics and Law” in Bankowski, Zenon (ed) Epistemology & Ontology: IVR-Symposium Lund 2003 (Franz Steiner 2005) 95–102.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, Mario and Shaver, Phillip R, “Attachment Theory and Research: Resurrection of the Psychodynamic Approach to Personality” (2005) 39 (1) Journal of Research in Personality 22–45.Google Scholar
Miller, Greg, “The Roots of Morality: Neurobiologists, Philosophers, Psychologists, and Legal Scholars Are Probing the Nature of Human Morality Using a Variety of Experimental Techniques and Moral Challenges” (2008) 320 (5877) Science 734–737.Google Scholar
Milward, Sophie J, Kita, Sotaro and Apperly, Ian A, “The Development of Co-Representation Effects in a Joint Task: Do Children Represent a Co-Actor?” (2014) 132 (3) Cognition 269–279.Google Scholar
Milward, Sophie J, Kita, Sotaro and Apperly, Ian A, “Individual Differences in Children’s Corepresentation of Self and Other in Joint Action” (2017) 88 (3) Child Development 964–978.Google Scholar
Mögele, Rudolf, “Art 216” in Streinz, Rudolf (ed) EUV/AEUV (CH Beck 3rd ed 2018).Google Scholar
Moore, George E, Some Main Problems of Philosophy (Macmillan 1953).Google Scholar
Moreno-Lax, Violeta and Ziegler, Katja S, “Autonomy of the EU Legal Order – A General Principle? On the Risks of Normative Functionalism and Selective Constitutionalism” in Ziegler, Katja S, Neuvonen, Päivi J and Moreno-Lax, Violeta (eds) General Principles in EU Law. Constructing Legal Orders in Europe (Edward Elgar 2022) 227–252.Google Scholar
Morris, William Edward, “David Hume” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (April 17, 2019), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Morscher, Edgar, “The Descriptive-Normative Dichotomy and the So Called Naturalistic Fallacy” (2016) 38 (2) Analyse und Kritik 317–337.Google Scholar
Müller, Andreas Th, “The Direct Effect of Customary International Law: The ‘Treaty Analogy’ and Its Limits” in Bordin, Fernando Lusa, Müller, Andreas Th and Pascual-Vives, Francisco (eds) The European Union and Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2022) 210–239.Google Scholar
Müller, Claudius, Die Rechtsphilosophie des Marburger Neukantianismus: Naturrecht und Rechtspositivismus in der Auseinandersetzung zwischen Hermann Cohen, Rudolf Stammler und Paul Natorp (Mohr Siebeck 1994).Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner, “Protecting the Rule of Law (and Democracy!) in the EU. The Idea of a Copenhagen Commission” in Closa, Carlos and Kochenov, Dimitry (eds) Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union (Cambridge University Press 2016) 206–224.Google Scholar
Müller, Matthias, Das Rechtsprechungsmonopol des EuGH im Kontext völkerrechtlicher Verträge. Untersucht anhand der Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Union (Nomos 2012).Google Scholar
Murray, Lynne and Trevarthen, Colwyn, “Emotional Regulation of Interactions between Two-Month-Olds and Their Mothers” in Field, Tiffany M and Fox, Nathan A (eds) Social Perception in Infants (Ablex 1985) 177–197.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura, “The Anthropological Study of Law” (1965) 67 (6) Ethnography of Law. American Anthropologist. New Series. Part 2 3–32.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, The View from Nowhere (Oxford University Press 1989).Google Scholar
Nagy, Emese, “Innate Intersubjectivity: Newborns’ Sensitivity to Communication Disturbance” (2008) 44 (6) Developmental Psychology 1779–1784.Google Scholar
Nagy, Emese, “The Newborn Infant: A Missing Stage in Developmental Psychology” (2011) 20 (1) Infant and Child Development 3–19.Google Scholar
Nagy, Emese and Molnár, Peter, “Homo Imitans or Homo Provocans? Human Imprinting Model of Neonatal Imitation” (2004) 27 (1) Infant Behavior and Development 54–63.Google Scholar
Narvaez, Darcia, Neurobiology and the Development of Human Morality. Evolution, Culture, and Wisdom (W W Norton & Company 2014).Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul, “‘On the Objective and Subjective Grounding of Knowledge’ (1887)” in Luft, Sebastian (ed) The Neo-Kantian Reader (translated by Lois Phillips and David Kolb Routledge 2015 [“Über objective und subjective Begründung der Erkenntniss” (1887) 23 Philosophische Monatshefte 257–286]) 164–179.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul, “‘Kant and the Marburg School’ (1912)” in Luft, Sebastian (ed) The Neo-Kantian Reader (translated by Frances Bottenberg Routledge 2015) [“Kant und die Marburger Schule” (1912) 17 Kant-Studien 193–221] 180–197.Google Scholar
Neframi, Eleftheria, “Customary International Law and the European Union from the Perspective of Article 3(5) TEU” in Eeckhout, Piet and López–Escudero, Manuel (eds) The European Union’s External Action in Times of Crisis (Hart 2016) 205–222.Google Scholar
Neframi, Eleftheria and Gatti, Mauro (eds), Constitutional Issues of EU External Relations Law (Nomos 2018).Google Scholar
Newman, Lex, “Descartes’ Epistemology” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (February 15, 2019), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/descartes-epistemology/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Nijman, Janne E and Nollkaemper, André, “Introduction” in Nijman, Janne E and Nollkaemper, André (eds) New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 1–14.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, “Inside or Out: Two Types of International Legal Pluralism” in Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko (eds) Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge University Press 2013) 94–139.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, “The Duality of Direct Effect of International Law” (2014) 25 (1) European Journal of International Law 105–125.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André and Reinisch, August, International Law in Domestic Courts. A Casebook (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André and van Alebeek, Rosanne, “Netherlands” in Palombino, Fulvio Maria (ed) Duelling for Supremacy: International Law vs. National Fundamental Principles (Cambridge University Press 2019) 255–276.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Seamus, “Book Review: Nicholas Rescher, Pluralism against the Demand for Consensus” (1995) 7 (2) Utilitas 340–343.Google Scholar
Odermatt, Jed, International Law and the European Union (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Odermatt, Jed, “The European Union’s Role in the Making and Confirmation of Customary International Law” in Bordin, Fernando Lusa, Müller, Andreas Th and Pascual-Vives, Francisco (eds) The European Union and Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2022) 66–94.Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo, Der Völkerrechtliche Vertrag im Staatlichen Recht – Eine Theoretische, Dogmatische und Vergleichende Untersuchung am Beispiel Österreichs (Springer 1973).Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo, Der Bundesstaat zwischen Reiner Rechtslehre und Verfassungsrealität (Braumüller 1976).Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo, “Unmittelbare Geltung und Vorrang des Gemeinschaftsrechts und die Auswirkungen auf das verfassungsrechtliche Rechtsschutzsystem” in Griller, Stefan, Korinek, Karl and Potacs, Michael (eds) Grundfragen und aktuelle Probleme des öffentlichen Rechts. Festschrift für Heinz Peter Rill zum 60. Geburtstag (LexisNexis 1995) 359–379.Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo, “Verfassungsrechtliche Aspekte der Übernahme von Gemeinschaftsrecht und Unionsrecht in die österreichische Rechtsordnung” in Hummer, Waldemar and Schweitzer, Michael (eds) Österreich und das Recht der Europäischen Union (Manz 1996) 169–197.Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo, “Die Auswirkungen der Europäischen Integration auf die Rechtssysteme der Mitgliedstaaten” in Breuss, Fritz, Fink, Gerhard and Griller, Stefan (eds) Vom Schumann-Plan zum Vertrag von Amsterdam Vol 2 (Springer 2000) 51–68.Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo, “Die Transformation der Verfassung. Die staatliche Verfassung und die europäische Integration” (2002) 124 (1) Juristische Blätter 2–11.Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo, “Die österreichische Verfassung und die europäische Integration” in Hummer, Waldemar (ed) Paradigmenwechsel im Europarecht zur Jahrtausendwende (Springer 2004) 67–85.Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo, “Die Einheit des Rechts: Völkerrecht, Europarecht und staatliches Recht als einheitliches Rechtssystem?” in Paulson, Stanley L and Stolleis, Michael (eds) Hans Kelsen: Staatsrechtslehrer und Rechtstheoretiker des 20. Jahrhunderts (Mohr Siebeck 2005) 160–175.Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo, “Übernahme des Vertrages von Lissabon in die österreichische Rechtsordnung” in Hummer, Waldemar and Obwexer, Walter (eds) Der Vertrag von Lissabon (Nomos 2009) 411–425.Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo, “EU-Beitritts-BVG” in Korinek, Karl et al (eds) Österreichisches Bundesverfassungsrecht (Verlag Österreich 12sup 2016).Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo and Eberhard, Harald, Verfassungsrecht (facultas 11th ed 2016).Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo and Müller, Andreas, “Artikel 50 B-VG” in Korinek, Karl et al (eds) Österreichisches Bundesverfassungsrecht (Verlag Österreich 14sup 2018).Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo and Potacs, Michael, EU-Recht und staatliches Recht. Die Anwendung des Europarechts im innerstaatlichen Recht (Linde 6th ed 2017).Google Scholar
Onishi, Kristine H and Baillargeon, Renée, “Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs?” (2005) 308 (5719) Science 255–258.Google Scholar
Ottmann, Henning, Geschichte des politischen Denkens: Das 20. Jahrhundert – Von der kritischen Theorie bis zur Globalisierung (J B Metzler 2012).Google Scholar
Palmer Olsen, Henrik, “The Danish Supreme Court’s Decision on the Constitutionality of Denmark’s Ratification of the Lisbon Treaty” (2013) 50 (5) Common Market Law Review 1489–1503.Google Scholar
Palmstorfer, Rainer, “Bundesverfassungsrechtliche Integrationsschranken und Unionsrecht” in Jabloner, Clemens et al (eds) Scharfsinn im Recht. Liber Amicorum für Michael Thaler (Jan Sramek 2019) 417–428.Google Scholar
Panksepp, Jaap, “At the Interface between the Affective, Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences: Decoding the Emotional Feelings of the Brain” (2003) 52 (1) Brain and Cognition 4–14.Google Scholar
Panksepp, Jaap and Trevarthen, Colwyn, “The Neuroscience of Emotion in Music” in Malloch, Stephen and Trevarthen, Colwyn (eds) Communicative Musicality: Exploring the Basis of Human Companionship (Oxford University Press 2009) 105–146.Google Scholar
Pardo, Michael S and Patterson, Dennis, Minds, Brains, and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Patterson, Dennis, Law and Truth (Oxford University Press 1996).Google Scholar
Patterson, Dennis, “On the Conceptual and the Empirical – A Critique of John Mikhail’s Cognitivism” (2008) 73 (2) Brooklyn Law Review 611–623.Google Scholar
Paulo, Norbert, Möck, Leonie and Kirchmair, Lando, “The Use and Abuse of Moral Preferences in the Ethics of Self-Driving Cars” in Aguiar, Fernando, Gaitán, Antonio and Viciana, Hugo (eds) Experiments in Moral and Political Philosophy (Routledge 2024) 290–309.Google Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L, “Zur neukantianischen Dimension der Reinen Rechtslehre. Vorwort zur Kelsen-Sander-Auseinandersetzung” in Paulson, Stanley L (ed) Die Rolle des Neukantianismus in der Reinen Rechtslehre. Eine Debatte zwischen Sander und Kelsen (Scientia 1988) 7–26.Google Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L, “Kelsen’s Legal Theory: The Final Round” (1992) 12 (2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 265–274.Google Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L, “The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law” (1992) 12 (3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 311–332.Google Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L, “On the Kelsen–Kant Problematic” in Valdés, Ernesto Garzón et al (eds) Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory. Festschrift für Carlos E Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin (Duncker & Humblot 1997) 197–213.Google Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L, “The Great Puzzle: Kelsen’s Basic Norm” in d’Almeida, Luís Duarte, Gardner, John and Green, Leslie (eds) Kelsen Revisited: New Essays on the Pure Theory of Law (Hart Publishing 2013) 43–62.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L, “Kompetenzüberschreitende Akte von Organen der Europäischen Union – Die Sicht des Völkerrechts” in Simma, Bruno and Schulte, Constanze (eds) Völker- und Europarecht in der aktuellen Diskussion (Linde 1999) 49–58.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L, Die internationale Gemeinschaft im Völkerrecht. Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung des Völkerrechts im Zeitalter der Globalisierung (CH Beck 2001).Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L, “Commentary to Andreas Fischer-Lescano & Gunther Teubner. The Legitimacy of International Law and the Role of the State” (2004) 25 (4) Michigan Journal of International Law 1047–1058.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L, “Jus Cogens in a Time of Hegemony and Fragmentation. An Attempt at a Re-appraisal” (2005) 74 Nordic Journal of International Law 297–334.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L, “The Emergence of the International Community and the Divide between International and Domestic Law” in Nijman, Janne E and Nollkaemper, André (eds) New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 216–250.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L, “Zur Zukunft der Völkerrechtswissenschaft in Deutschland: Zwischen Konstitutionalisierung und Fragmentierung des Völkerrechts” (2007) 67 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 695–719.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L, “From Dualism to Pluralism: The Relationship between International Law, European Law, and Domestic Law” in Bekker, Pieter H F, Dolzer, Rudolf and Waibel, Michael (ed) Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy. Essays in Honour of Detlev Vagts (Cambridge University Press 2010) 132–153.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L, “Human Rights Protection in a European Network of Courts” (2013) 107 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 174–182.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L, “Internationales, nationales und privates Recht. Hybridisierung der Rechtsordnungen” (2014) 46 Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internationales Recht 7–46.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L, “Engaging in Judicial Dialogue” in Müller, Amrei (ed) Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2017) 258–266.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas, “Horizontale und vertikale Aufgabenteilung beim Grundrechtsschutz in Europa” in Groh, Thomas et al (eds) Verfassungsrecht, Völkerrecht, Menschenrechte – Vom Recht im Zentrum der Internationalen Beziehungen. Festschrift für Ulrich Fastenrath (C F Müller 2019) 79–88.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L and Leiss, Johann Ruben, “Constitutionalism and the Mechanics of Global Law Transfers” (2018) 9 Goettingen Journal of International Law – 1 Special Issue: The Law behind Rule of Law Transfers 35–69.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas L and Lippold, Matthias, “Customary Law in the Postmodern World (Dis)Order” (2018) 112 American Journal of International Law Unbound 308–312.Google Scholar
Paulus, Markus, “The Emergence of Prosocial Behavior: Why Do Infants and Toddlers Help, Comfort, and Share” (2014) 8 (2) Child Development Perspectives 77–81.Google Scholar
Pawlowski, Hans-Martin, Methodenlehre für Juristen. Theorie der Norm und des Gesetzes (C F Müller 3rd ed 1999).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders, “Truth and Falsity and Error” in Baldwin, James Mark (ed) Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology Vol 2 (Macmillan 1901) 716–720.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders, “Science Immortality” in Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul (eds) Charles Sanders Peirce. Collected Papers Vol VI: Scientific Metaphysics (Harvard University Press 1935).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders, Collected Papers Vol VII (Harvard University Press 1958).Google Scholar
Pellet, Alain and Müller, Daniel, “Article 38” in Zimmermann, Andreas et al (eds) The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 3rd ed 2018).Google Scholar
Perner, Josef, Understanding the Representational Mind (MIT Press 1991).Google Scholar
Pernice, Ingolf, “Die Dritte Gewalt im europäischen Verfassungsverbund” (1996) 31 (1) Europarecht 27–43.Google Scholar
Pernice, Ingolf, “Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-Making Revisited?” (1999) 36 (4) Common Market Law Review 703–750.Google Scholar
Pernice, Ingolf, “Europäisches und nationales Verfassungsrecht” (2001) 60 Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 148–193.Google Scholar
Pernice, Ingolf, “The Treaty of Lisbon: Multilevel Constitutionalism in Action” (2009) 15 (3) Columbia Journal of European Law 349–407.Google Scholar
Pernice, Ingolf, “Der Schutz nationaler Identität in der Europäischen Union” (2011) 136 (2) Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 185–221.Google Scholar
Pernice, Ingolf, “The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order – Fifty Years after Van Gend” in Tizzano, Antonio, Kokott, Juliane and Prechal, Sacha (eds) 50th Anniversary of the Judgment in van Gend en Loos (EU Publications Office 2013) 55–80.Google Scholar
Pernice, Ingolf, “Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe” (2015) 11 (3) European Constitutional Law Review 541–562.Google Scholar
Pernthaler, Peter, “Der österreichische Bundesstaat im Spannungsfeld von Föderalismus und formalem Rechtspositivismus” (1969) 19 Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 361–379.Google Scholar
Pernthaler, Peter, Die Staatsgründungsakte der österreichischen Bundesländer: Eine staatsrechtliche Untersuchung über die Entstehung des Bundesstaates (Braumüller 1979).Google Scholar
Pernthaler, Peter, Allgemeine Staatslehre und Verfassungslehre (Springer 1984).Google Scholar
Pernthaler, Peter, Allgemeine Staatslehre und Verfassungslehre (Springer 2nd ed 1996).Google Scholar
Pernthaler, Peter, “Die neue Doppelverfassung Österreichs” in Haller, Herbert et al (eds) Staat und Recht. Festschrift für Günther Winkler (Springer 1997) 773–796.Google Scholar
Pernthaler, Peter, Der Verfassungskern. Gesamtänderung und Durchbrechung der Verfassung im Lichte der Theorie, Rechtsprechung und europäischen Verfassungskultur (Manz 1998).Google Scholar
Pernthaler, Peter and Weber, Karl, “Bundesverfassung und Föderalismus” (1982) 21 (4) Der Staat 576–590.Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J, A Global Political Morality: Human Rights, Democracy, and Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Pescatore, Pierre, L’ordre juridique des Communautés Européennes: Étude des sources du droit communautaire (Liège 2nd ed 1975).Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, “The Position of International Law within the European Community Legal Order” (1997) 40 German Yearbook of International Law 9–77.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, Elemente einer Theorie der Verfassung Europas (Duncker & Humblot 2001).Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, “Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures” (2006) 19 (3) Leiden Journal of International Law 579–610.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, “The Globalization of State Constitutions” in Nijman, Janne and Nollkaemper, Andre (eds) New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 251–308.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, “Rechtsordnungen und Konstitutionalisierung: Zur Neubestimmung der Verhältnisse” (2010) 65 (1) Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 3–63.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, Beyond Human Rights. The Legal Status of the Individual in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, “Constitutionalisation” in d’Aspremont, Jean and Singh, Sahib (eds) Concepts for International Law – Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (Edward Elgar 2019) 141–153.Google Scholar
Petersen, Nils, “Customary Law without Custom? Rules, Principles, and the Role of State Practice in International Norm Creation” (2007–2008) 23 (2) American University International Law Review 275–310.Google Scholar
Petersen, Nils, “The Role of Consent and Uncertainty in the Formation of Customary International Law” in Lepard, Brian D (ed) Reexamining Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2018) 111–130.Google Scholar
Pfersmann, Otto, “La production des normes: production normative et hiérarchie des normes” in Troper, Michel and Chagnollaud, Dominique (eds) Traité international de droit constitutionnel. Distribution des pouvoirs, Vol 2 (Dalloz 2012) 483–528.Google Scholar
Piccirilli, Giovanni, “The ‘Taricco Saga’: The Italian Constitutional Court Continues Its European Journey” (2018) 14 (4) European Constitutional Law Review 814–833.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry, Hegel’s Phenomenology. The Sociality of Reason (Cambridge University Press 1994).Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature (Viking 2002).Google Scholar
Pirker, Benedikt, Grundrechtsschutz im Unionsrecht zwischen Subsidiarität und Integration. Zur Anwendung der Unionsgrundrechte auf die Mitgliedstaaten (Nomos 2018).Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Quaestiones Convivales, Morals (corrected and revised by William W. Goodwin, 1874), available at www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2008.01.0312%3Abook%3D2%3Achapter%3D3%3Asection%3D2 [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Podszun, Rupprecht, “Corporate Social Responsibility – Standards: Rechtstheoretische Aspekte und die Frage, was den ‘Markenkern’ der Rechtswissenschaft ausmacht” in Hilty, Reto M and Henning-Bodewig, Frauke (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility: Verbindliche Standards des Wettbewerbsrechts? (Springer 2014) 51–80.Google Scholar
Polakiewicz, Jörg, “International Law and Domestic (Municipal) Law, Law and Decisions of International Organizations and Courts” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Pollicino, Oreste and Repetto, Giorgio, “Not to Be Pushed Aside: The Italian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice” (February 27, 2019) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/not-to-be-pushed-aside-the-italian-constitutional-court-and-the-european-court-of-justice/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Polzin, Monika, Verfassungsidentität: Ein normatives Konzept des Grundgesetzes? (Mohr Siebeck 2018).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, “Philosophical Comments on Tarski’s Theory of Truth” in Karl Popper, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Oxford Clarendon Press 2nd ed 1972) 319–340.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, Logik der Forschung (Mohr Siebeck 8th ed 1984).Google Scholar
Porges, Stephen W and Carter, Carol Sue, “Neurobiology and Evolution: Mechanisms, Mediators, and Adaptive Consequences of Caregiving” in Brown, Stephanie L, Brown, R Michael and Penner, Louis A (eds) Self-Interest and Beyond: Toward a New Understanding of Human Caregiving (Oxford University Press 2007) 53–71.Google Scholar
Poscher, Ralf, “Wahrheit und Recht. Die Wahrheitsfragen des Rechts im Lichte der deflationären Wahrheitstheorie” (2003) 89 (2) Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 200–215.Google Scholar
Pöschl, Magdalena, “Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit nach Lissabon Anmerkungen zum Charta-Erkenntnis des VfGH” (2012) 67 (3) Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 587–609.Google Scholar
Pospisil, Leopold, Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Perspective (Harper & Row 1971).Google Scholar
Potacs, Michael, “Zum Rang des Gemeinschaftsrechts gegenüber staatlichem Recht” in Jabloner, Clemens, Lucius, Otto and Schramm, Alfred (eds) Theorie und Praxis des Wirtschaftsrechts. Festschrift für H. René Laurer (Springer 2009) 185–198.Google Scholar
Potacs, Michael, “Das Verhältnis zwischen der EU und ihren Mitgliedstaaten im Lichte traditioneller Modelle” (2010) 65 (1) Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 117–139.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J, “Is Morality Innate?” in Sinnot-Armstrong, Walter (ed) Moral Psychology. Evolution of Morality: Adaptations and Innateness Vol I (MIT Press 2007) 367–406.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J, The Emotional Construction of Morals (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J, “Resisting the Linguistic Analogy: A Commentary on Hauser, Young, and Cushman” in Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (ed) Moral Psychology. The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity Vol. II (MIT Press 2008) 157–170.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J, “Is Empathy Necessary for Morality?” in Coplan, Amy and Goldie, Peter (eds) Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives (Oxford University Press 2011) 211–229.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary, “Why Reason Cannot Be Naturalized” (1982) 52 (1) Synthese 3–23.Google Scholar
Rand, David G, Greene, Joshua D and Nowak, Martin A, “Spontaneous Giving and Calculated Greed” (2012) 489 Nature 427–430.Google Scholar
Rask Madsen, Mikael, Palmer Olsen, Henrik and Šadl, Urška, “Legal Disintegration? The Ruling of the Danish Supreme Court in AJOS” (January 30, 2017) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/legal-disintegration-the-ruling-of-the-danish-supreme-court-in-ajos/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Morten, “Revolutionizing European law: A History of the Van Gend en Loos Judgment” (2014) 12 (1) International Journal of Constitutional Law 136–163.Google Scholar
Rauchegger, Clara, “Four Functions of the Principle of Primacy in the Post-Lisbon Case Law of the European Court of Justice” in Ziegler, Katja S, Neuvonen, Päivi J and Moreno-Lax, Violeta (eds) General Principles in EU Law. Constructing Legal Orders in Europe (Edward Elgar 2022) 157–172.Google Scholar
Rauter, Thomas, Judicial Practice, Customary International Criminal Law and Nullum Crimen Sine Lege (Springer 2017).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press 1971).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, “The Independence of Moral Theory” (1975) 48 Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 5–22.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples (Harvard University Press 1999).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press expanded ed 2005).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System (Oxford University Press 2nd ed 1980).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Why the State?” in Roughan, Nichole and Halpin, Andrew (eds) In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press 2017) 136–162.Google Scholar
Reddy, Vasu, How Infants Know Minds (Harvard University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Reddy, Vasu, “Joining Intentions in Infancy” (2015) 22 (1–2) Journal of Consciousness Studies 24–44.Google Scholar
Rehbinder, Manfred, Die Begründung der deutschen Rechtssoziologie durch Eugen Ehrlich (Duncker & Humblot 2nd ed 1986).Google Scholar
Reid, Vincent M and Striano, Tricia, “The Directed Attention Model of Infant Social Cognition” (2007) 4 (1) European Journal of Developmental Psychology 100–110.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, “Zur unmittelbaren Anwendbarkeit von EWR–Recht” (1993) 34 Zeitschrift für Europarecht, Internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung 11–30.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, International Organizations before National Courts (Cambridge University Press 2000).Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, “The Division of Powers between the EU and Its Member States ‘After Lisbon’” in Bungenberg, Marc, Griebel, Joern and Hindelang, Steffen (eds) International Investment Law and EU Law – Special Issue of European Yearbook of International Economic Law (Springer 2011) 43–54.Google Scholar
Rensmann, Thilo, “Article 46” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (Springer 2nd ed 2018).Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas, The Coherence Theory of Truth (Oxford University Press 1973).Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas, Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus (Oxford Clarendon Press 1993).Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas, Epistemology. An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (State University of New York Press 2003).Google Scholar
Ress, Georg, “Wechselwirkungen zwischen Völkerrecht und Verfassung bei der Auslegung völkerrechtlicher Verträge” in Ress, Georg and Schreuer, Christoph (eds) Wechselwirkungen zwischen Völkerrecht und Verfassung bei der Auslegung völkerrechtlicher Verträge (C F Müller 1982).Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan, “‘The Fact of Science’ and Critique of Knowledge: Exact Science as Problem and Resource in Marburg Neo-Kantianism” in Friedman, Michael and Nordmann, Alfred (eds) The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science (MIT Press 2006) 211–226.Google Scholar
Richmond, Catherine, “Preserving the Identity Crisis: Autonomy, System and Sovereignty in European Law” (1997) 16 (4) Law and Philosophy 377–420.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Jeremy, The Empathic Civilization. The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis (Penguin 2009).Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick, Will and Political Legitimacy (Harvard University Press 1982).Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea E, “Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation” (2001) 95 (4) American Journal of International Law 757–791.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea E, Is International Law International? (Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Rochat, Philippe, “Five Levels of Self-Awareness as They Unfold Early in Life” (2003) 12 Consciousness and Cognition 717–731.Google Scholar
Rochat, Philippe, Others in Mind. Social Origins of Self-Consciousness (Cambridge University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Rochat, Philippe and Passos-Ferreira, Cláudia, “From Imitation to Reciprocation and Mutual Recognition” in Pineda, Jaime A (ed) Mirror Neuron Systems: The Role of Mirroring Processes in Social Cognition (Humana Press Springer 2008) 191–212.Google Scholar
Rochat, Philippe, Passos-Ferreira, Cláudia and Salem, Pedro, “Three Levels of Intersubjectivity in Early Development” in Carassa, Antonella, Morganti, Francesca and Riva, Giuseppe (eds) Enacting Intersubjectivity. Paving the Way for a Dialogue between Cognitive Science, Social Cognition and Neuroscience (Da Larioprint 2009) 173–190.Google Scholar
Rochat, Phillipe and Striano, Tricia, “Social-Cognitive Development in the First Year” in Rochat, Philippe (ed) Early Social Cognition: Understanding Others in the First Months of Life (Lawrence Erlbaum 1999) 3–34.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Iglesias, Gil C, “Zu den Grenzen der verfahrensrechtlichen Autonomie der Mitgliedstaaten bei der Anwendung des Gemeinschaftsrechts” (1997) 24 (14–16) Europäische Grundrechtezeitschrift 289–295.Google Scholar
Rohlf, Michael, “Immanuel Kant” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (January 25, 2016), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “Introduction” in Rorty, Richard (ed) The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. With Two Retrospective Essays (University of Chicago Press 1967 reprinted in 1992) 1–39.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton University Press 1979).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “Born to Be Good” (August 27, 2006) New York Times, available at at www.nytimes.com/2006/08/27/books/review/Rorty.t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Rosas, Allan, “The European Court of Justice and Public International Law” in Wouters, Jan, Nollkaemper, André and de Wet, Erika (eds) The Europeanisation of International Law (TMC Asser Press 2008) 71–85.Google Scholar
Rosas, Allan, “When Is the Charter of Fundamental Rights Applicable at National Level?” (2012) 19 (4) Jurisprudence 1269–1288.Google Scholar
Rosas, Allan, “International Responsibility of the EU and the European Court of Justice” in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds) The International Responsibility of the European Union. European and International Perspectives (Hart 2013) 139–159.Google Scholar
Rosas, Allan, “Recent Case Law of the European Court of Justice Relating to Article 218 TFEU” in Czuczai, Jenő and Naert, Frederik (eds) The EU as a Global Actor – Bridging Legal Theory and Practice: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Ricardo Gosalbo Bono (Brill Nijhoff 2017) 365–379.Google Scholar
Roughan, Nicole, “The Relative Authority of Law: A Contribution to ‘Pluralist Jurisprudence’” in Del Mar, Maksymilian (ed) New Waves in Philosophy of Law (Palgrave Macmillan 2011) 254–273.Google Scholar
Roughan, Nicole, Authorities. Conflicts, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, The Social Contract (The Social Contract and The First and The Second Discourses, translated and edited by Dunn, Susan Yale University Press 2002 [Du Contract Social; Ou Principes du Droit Politique 1762]).Google Scholar
Ruffert, Matthias, “Artikel 3 EUV” in Calliess, Christian and Ruffert, Matthias (eds) EUV/AEUV (CH Beck 6th ed 2022) 48–60.Google Scholar
Ruffert, Matthias, “Artikel 47 EUV” in Calliess, Christian and Ruffert, Matthias (eds) EUV/AEUV (CH Beck 6th ed 2022) 450–453.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, “On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood” (1906–1907) 7 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 28–49.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, The Philosophy of Logical Atomism (Routledge 2010 [Fontana 1972]).Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech, Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Sahakian, Barbara J and Gottwald, Julia, Sex, Lies, and Brain Scans. How fMRI Reveals What Really Goes on in Our Minds (Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Saiz Arnaiz, Alejandro and Alcoberro Llivina, Carina (eds), National Constitutional Identity and European Integration (Intersentia 2013).Google Scholar
Salvadori, Eliala et al, “Probing the Strength of Infants’ Preference for Helpers over Hinderers: Two Replication Attempts of Hamlin and Wynn (2011)” (2015) 10 (11) PLOS ONE 1–10.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, Daniel, “Crossing the Baltic Rubicon” (March 4, 2019) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/crossing-the-baltic-rubicon/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Sauer, Hanno, “The End of History” (2022) Inquiry, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2124542 [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas M, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism” in Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard (eds) Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge University Press 1982) 103–128, reprinted in Thomas M Scanlon, The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy (2003 Cambridge University Press) 124–150.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas M, What We Owe to Each Other (Harvard University Press 1999).Google Scholar
Scattola, Merio, “Alberico Gentili (1552–1608)” in Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 1092–1097.Google Scholar
Scelle, Georges, Précis de droit des gens: Principes et systématique Vol I (Librairie du Recueil Sirey 1932).Google Scholar
Schachter, Oskar, “Entangling Treaty and Custom” in Dinstein, Yoram and Tabory, Mala (ed) International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essay in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Martinus Nijhoff 1989) 717–738.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Gregory, “A Transnational Take on Krisch’s Pluralist Postnational Law” (2012) 23 (2) European Journal of International Law 565–582.Google Scholar
Schäffer, Heinz, “Österreich und die Europäische Union – Erfahrungen und Leistungen des österreichischen VfGH” (2005) 60 Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 345–388.Google Scholar
Scheinin, Martin, “Is the ECJ Ruling in Kadi Incompatible with International Law?” (2009) 28 (1) Yearbook of European Law 637–653.Google Scholar
Schermers, Henry G and Blokker, Niels M, International Institutional Law (Brill 6th ed 2018).Google Scholar
Schilling, Theodor, “The Autonomy of the Community Legal Order: An Analysis of Possible Foundations” (1996) 37 (2) Harvard International Law Journal 389–409.Google Scholar
Schilling, Theodor, “Das Verhältnis zwischen Völkerrecht, Gemeinschaftsrecht und staatlichem Recht” in Griller, Stefan and Rill, Heinz Peter (eds) Rechtstheorie: Rechtsbegriff – Dynamik – Auslegung (Springer 2011) 153–194.Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, Kirsten, Der neue Europaartikel 23 des Grundgesetzes im Lichte der Arbeit der Gemeinsamen Verfassungskommission (Duncker & Humblot 1996).Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, Kirsten “Normentheorie vs. Terrorismus: Der Vorrang des UN-Rechts vor EU-Recht” (2006) 61 (7) JuristenZeitung 349–353.Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, Kirsten, “Die Europäische Union und das universelle Völkerrecht” in Schroeder, Werner (ed) Europarecht als Mehrebenensystem (Nomos/facultas 2008) 67–88.Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, Kirsten, “Struggle for Exclusiveness: The ECJ and Competing International Tribunals” in Buffard, Isabelle et al (eds) International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Martinus Nijhoff 2008) 1045–1068.Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, Kirsten, “Art 2” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (Springer 2nd ed 2018).Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, Kirsten, “Article 26” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (Springer 2nd ed 2018).Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, Kirsten, “Article 27” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (Springer 2nd ed 2018) 493–504.Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, Kirsten, “Art. 216 AEUV” in Calliess, Christian and Ruffert, Matthias (eds) EUV/AEUV (CH Beck 6th ed 2022) 2063–2083.Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, Kirsten, “Art. 218 AEUV” in Calliess, Christian and Ruffert, Matthias (eds) EUV/AEUV (CH Beck 6th ed 2022) 2096–2107.Google Scholar
Schöneberger, Christoph, “Identitäterä – Verfassungsidentität zwischen Widerstandsformel und Musealisierung des Grundgesetzes” (2015) 63 Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 41–62.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, “Further Psychological Observations” in Arthur Schopenhauer, Suffering, Suicide and Immortality. Eight Essays from The Parerga (selected and translated by T Bailey Saunders Dover 2006 [Parerga und Paralipomena. Kleine Philosophische Schriften 1851]) 39–62.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, The World as Will and Representation Vol I (translated by Judith Norman and Alistair Welchman and edited by Janaway, Christopher Cambridge University Press 2010 [Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung 1818]).Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, The World as Will and Representation Vol II (translated by Judith Norman and Alistair Welchman and edited by Janaway, Christopher Cambridge University Press 2018 [Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung 1848]).Google Scholar
Schroeder, Renée, Die Henne und das Ei: Auf der Suche nach dem Ursprung des Lebens (Residenz 2011).Google Scholar
Schroeder, Werner, Das Gemeinschaftsrechtssystem: Eine Untersuchung zu den rechtsdogmatischen, rechtstheoretischen und verfassungsrechtlichen Grundlagen des Systemdenkens im Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht (Mohr Siebeck 2002).Google Scholar
Schroeder, Werner, “Die Europäische Union als Völkerrechtssubjekt” in Obwexer, Walter (ed) Die Europäische Union im Völkerrecht 2 (2012) Europarecht-Beiheft 9–24.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Werner, “Customary International Law in the European Union Legal System: Reception, Rank, Application and Interpretation” in Bordin, Fernando Lusa, Müller, Andreas Th and Pascual-Vives, Francisco (eds) The European Union and Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2022) 177–209.Google Scholar
Schulte, Joachim, Wittgenstein. Eine Einführung (Reclam 2nd ed 2016).Google Scholar
Schuppert, Gunnar Folke, “Europa im Verfassungsfieber – Bemerkungen zu Sinn und Unsinn der europäischen Verfassungsdebatte” in Katenhusen, Ines and Lamping, Wolfram (eds) Demokratien in Europa: Der Einfluss der europäischen Integration auf Institutionenwandel und neue Konturen des demokratischen Verfassungsstaates (Springer 2003) 91–116.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Michael, Das Völkergewohnheitsrecht und seine Geltung für neuentstehende Staaten (Gehlen 1969).Google Scholar
Schwöbel, Christine E J, Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2011).Google Scholar
Seinecke, Ralf, “Recht und Rechtspluralismus: Forschungsperspektiven der ‘Rechts’-Wissenschaften und ‘Rechts’-Philosophie” in Bäcker, Carsten and Ziemann, Sascha (eds) Junge Rechtsphilosophie (Franz Steiner 2012)143–158.Google Scholar
Selby, Jane M and Bradley, Ben S, “Infants in Groups: A Paradigm for the Study of Early Social Experience” (2003) 46 (4) Human Development 197–221.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid, Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (Harvard University Press 2nd ed 1997).Google Scholar
Sellers, Mortimer and Tomaszewski, Tadeusz (eds), The Rule of Law in Comparative Perspective (Springer 2010).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, Romeo and Juliet (John Danter 1597).Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N, International Law (Cambridge University Press 7th ed 2014).Google Scholar
Sibley, William M, “The Rational versus the Reasonable” (1953) 62 (4) Philosophical Review 554–560.Google Scholar
Siegel, Daniel J, The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are (Guilford 1999).Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno and Alston, Philip G, “The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General Principles” (1988–1989) 12 Australian Yearbook of International Law 82–108.Google Scholar
Simmons, A John, “Justification and Legitimacy” (1999) 109 (4) Ethics 739–771, reprinted in Simmons, A John, Justification and Legitimacy – Essays on Rights and Obligations (Cambridge University Press 2001) 122–157.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C, From Rationalism to Existentialism: The Existentialists and Their Nineteenth-Century Backgrounds (Rowman & Littlefield 2001).Google Scholar
Somek, Alexander, “Monism: A Tale of the Undead” in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds) Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union (Hart 2012) 343–379.Google Scholar
Somek, Alexander, The Cosmopolitan Constitution (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Sørensen, Max, “Principes de droit international public” (1960) 101 Recueil des Cours III 1–254.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Max, “Theory and Reality in International Law” (1981) 75 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 140–149.Google Scholar
Spieker, Luke Dimitrios, EU Values before the Court of Justice. Foundations, Potential, Risks (Oxford University Press 2023).Google Scholar
Stammler, Rudolf, Die Lehre vom richtigen Rechte (De Gruyter 1902).Google Scholar
Starke, Joseph G, “Monism and Dualism in the Theory of International Law” (1936) 17 British Yearbook of International Law 66–81.Google Scholar
Stein, Ted L, “The Approach of the Different Drummer: The Principle of the Persistent Objector in International Law” (1985) 26 (2) Harvard International Law Journal 457–482.Google Scholar
Stern, Daniel N, The Interpersonal World of the Infant. A View from Psychoanalysis and Development Psychology (Basic Books 1985).Google Scholar
Stern, Daniel N, The Interpersonal World of the Infant. A View from Psychoanalysis and Development Psychology (Basic Books 1st paperback ed 2000).Google Scholar
Stern, Daniel N, Forms of Vitality. Exploring Dynamic Experience in Psychology and the Arts (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Stettner, Rupert, “Europäisches Gemeinschaftsrecht als Quelle der Rechtsfindung deutscher Gerichte 1974–1984” (1986) 111 (3–4) Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 359–413 and 537–594.Google Scholar
Stollmann, Rainer, Groteske Aufklärung. Studien zu Natur und Kultur des Lachens (M & P 1997).Google Scholar
Streinz, Rudolf, “Artikel 23” in Sachs, Michae (ed) Grundgesetz (CH Beck 7th ed 2014).Google Scholar
Strupp, Karl, “Les règles générales du droit international de la paix” (1934) 47 Recueil des Cours I 259–595.Google Scholar
Suhler, L Christopher and Churchland, Patricia S, “Can Innate, Modular ‘Foundations’ Explain Morality? Challenges for Haidt’s Moral Foundations Theory” (2011) 23 (9) Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2103–2116.Google Scholar
Suteu, Silvia, “The Populist Turn in Central and Eastern Europe: Is Deliberative Democracy Part of the Solution?” (2019) 15 (3) European Constitutional Law Review 488–518.Google Scholar
Taki, Hiroshi, “Opinio Juris and the Formation of Customary International Law: A Theoretical Analysis” (2008) 51 German Yearbook of International Law 447–466.Google Scholar
Talmon, Stefan, “Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion” (2015) 26 (2) European Journal of International Law 417–443.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z, “Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global” (2008) 30 (3) Sydney Law Review 375–411.Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred, “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages” in Alfred Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (Hackett 2nd ed 1983 [1935]) 152–278.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, John, “Opinio Juris and the Genesis of Custom: A Solution to the ‘Paradox’” (2007) 26 Australian Yearbook of International Law 199–205.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, John, “Custom, Jus Cogens, and Human Rights” in Bradley, Curtis A (ed) Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 95–116.Google Scholar
Terhechte, Philipp, “Article 216 TFEU” in Schwarze, Jürgen (ed) EU-Kommentar (Nomos 4th ed 2018).Google Scholar
Terhechte, Philipp, “Article 218 TFEU” in Schwarze, Jürgen (ed) EU-Kommentar (Nomos 4th ed 2018).Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, “Globale Bukowina” (1996) 15 Rechtshistorisches Journal 255–290.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, “Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in World Society” in Teubner, Gunther (ed) Global Law without a State (Dartmouth 1997) 3–28.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, “Globale Zivilverfassungen: Alternativen zur staatszentrierten Verfassungstheorie” (2003) 63 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 1–28.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (translated by Gareth Norbury Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Thaler, Michael, “Rechtsphilosophie und das Verhältnis zwischen Gemeinschaftsrecht und nationalem Recht” (2000) 8 Journal für Rechtspolitik 75–84.Google Scholar
Theosophy, “Ancient Landmarks: Plato and Aristotle” (1939) 27 (11) Theosophy 483–491.Google Scholar
Thienel, Rudolf, “Ein ‘komplexer’ oder ein normativer Bundesstaatsbegriff?” (1991) 42 Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZÖR) 215–252.Google Scholar
Thomas, Frederik, “Das Maastricht-Judgment des dänischen Obersten Gerichtshofs vom 6. April 1998” (1998) 58 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 879–906.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem” (1976) 59 (2) The Monist 204–217.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, “The Trolley Problem” (1985) 94 (6) Yale Law Journal 1395–1415.Google Scholar
Thym, Daniel, “In the Name of Sovereign Statehood: A Critical Introduction to the Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court” (2009) 46 (6) Common Market Law Review 1795–1822.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition (Harvard University Press 1999).Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael and Vaish, Amrisha, “Origins of Human Cooperation and Morality” (2013) 64 Annual Review of Psychology 231–255.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael et al, “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition” (2005) 28 (5) Behavioral & Brain Sciences 1–61.Google Scholar
Trejo-Mathys, Jonathan, “Neo-Kantianism in the Philosophy of Law: Its Value and Actuality” in de Warren, Nicolas and Staiti, Andrea (eds) New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism (Cambridge University Press 2015) 147–170.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “Communication and Cooperation in Early Infancy. A Description of Primary Intersubjectivity” in Bullowa, Margaret (ed) Before Speech: The Beginning of Human Communication (Cambridge University Press 1979) 321–347.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “How Control of Movements Develops” in Whiting, H T A (ed) Human Motor Actions: Bernstein Reassessed (Elsevier 1984) 223–261.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “Development of Intersubjective Motor Control in Infants” in Wade, Michael G and Whiting, H T A (eds) Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control (Martinus Nijhof 1986) 209–261.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “Form, Significance and Psychological Potential of Hand Gestures of Infants” in Nespoulous, Jean-Luc, Perron, Paul and Lecours, André Roch (eds) The Biological Foundation of Gestures: Motor and Semiotic Aspects (Erlbaum 1986) 149–202.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “An Infant’s Motives for Speaking and Thinking in the Culture” in Wold, Astrid H (ed) The Dialogical Alternative: Towards a Theory of Language and Mind. Festschrift für Ragnar Rommetveit (Scandinavian University Press/Oxford University Press 1992) 99–137.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “The Concept and Foundations of Infant Intersubjectivity” in Bråten, Stein (ed) Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny (Cambridge University Press 1998) 15–46.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “The Neurobiology of Early Communication: Intersubjective Regulations in Human Brain Development” in Kalverboer, Alex Fedde and Gramsbergen, Albert (eds) Handbook on Brain and Behavior in Human Development (Kluwer 2001) 841–882.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “First Things First: Infants Make Good Use of the Sympathetic Rhythm of Imitation, without Reason or Language” (2005) 31 (1) Journal of Child Psychotherapy 91–113.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “The Intersubjective Psychobiology of Human Meaning: Learning of Culture Depends on Interest for Co-operative Practical Work and Affection for the Joyful Art of Good Company” (2009) 19 Psychoanalytic Dialogues 507–518.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “The Generation of Human Meaning: How Shared Experience Grows in Infancy” in Seemann, Alex (ed) Joint Attention: New Developments in Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience (MIT Press 2011) 73–135.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “What Is It Like to Be a Person Who Knows Nothing? Defining the Active Intersubjective Mind of a Newborn Human Being” (2011) 20 (1) Infant and Child Development 119–135.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, “Embodied Human Intersubjectivity: Imaginative Agency, to Share Meaning” (2012) 4 (1) Cognitive Semiotics 6–56.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn and Aitken, Ken, “Infant Intersubjectivity: Research, Theory, and Clinical Applications” (2001) 42 (1) Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 3–48.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn and Bjørkvold, Jon-Roar, “Life for Learning. How a Young Child Seeks Joy with Companions in a Meaningful World” in Narvaez, Darcia et al (eds) Contexts for Young Child Flourishing: Evolution, Family, and Society (Oxford University Press 2016) 28–60.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn and Delafield-Butt, Jonathan, “Biology of Shared Meaning and Language Development: Regulating the Life of Narratives” in Legerstee, Maria, Haley, David W and Bornstein, Marc H (eds) The Infant Mind: Origins of the Social Brain (Guilford Press 2013) 167–199.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn and Delafield-Butt, Jonathan, “Intersubjectivity in the Imagination and Feelings of the Infant: Implications for Education in the Early Years” in White, E Jayne and Dalli, Carmen (eds) Under-Three Year Olds in Policy and Practice (Springer 2017) 17–39.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, Delafield-Butt, Jonathan and Schögler, Benjamin, “Psychobiology of Musical Gesture: Innate Rhythm, Harmony and Melody in Movements of Narration” in Gritten, Anthony and King, Elaine (eds) Music and Gesture II (Ashgate 2011) 11–43.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, Gratier, Maya and Osborne, Nigel, “The Human Nature of Culture and Education” (2014) 5 (2) Cognitive Science 173–192.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn and Hubley, Penelope, “Secondary Intersubjectivity: Confidence, Confiding and Acts of Meaning in the First Year” in Lock, Andrew (ed) Action, Gesture and Symbol (Academic Press 1978) 183–229.Google Scholar
Triepel, Heinrich, Völkerrecht und Landesrecht (C L Hirschfeld 1899).Google Scholar
Tunkin, Grigory I, “Remarks on the Juridical Nature of Customary Norms of International Law” (1961) 49 (3) California Law Review 419–430.Google Scholar
Tunkin, Grigory I, Theory of International Law (translated by W E Butler George Allen & Unwin 1974).Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaarlo, European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Twining, William, “A Post-Westphalian Conception of Law” (2003) 37 (1) Law and Society Review 199–258.Google Scholar
Tzevelekos, Vassilis, “Juris Dicere: Custom as a Matrix, Custom as a Norm, and the Role of Judges and (Their) Ideology in Custom Making” in Rajkovic, Nikolas M et al (eds) Power of Legality: Practices of International Law and Their Politics (Cambridge University Press 2016) 188–208.Google Scholar
Tzu, Chuang, The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu (translated by Burton Watson Columbia University Press 1968).Google Scholar
Uerpmann-Wittzack, Robert, “The Constitutional Role of International Law” in von Bogdandy, Armin and Bast, Jürgen (eds) Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart et al 2nd ed 2011) 131–167.Google Scholar
Uitz, Renata, “National Constitutional Identity in the European Constitutional Project: A Recipe for Exposing Cover Ups and Masquerades” (November 11, 2016) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/national-constitutional-identity-in-the-european-constitutional-project-a-recipe-for-exposing-cover-ups-and-masquerades/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Van der Schyff, Gerhard, “EU Member State Constitutional Identity: A Comparison of Germany and the Netherlands as Polar Opposites” (2016) 76 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 167–191.Google Scholar
Van Elsuwege, Peter, “The Potential for Inter-Institutional Conflicts before the Court of Justice: Impact of the Lisbon Treaty” in Cremona, Marise and Thies, Anne (eds) The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law – Constitutional Challenges (Hart 2016) 115–136.Google Scholar
Van Roermund, Bert, “Norm-Claims, Validity, and Self-Reference” in d’Almeida, Luís Duarte, Gardner, John and Green, Leslie (eds) Kelsen Revisited: New Essays on the Pure Theory of Law (Hart Publishing 2013) 11–42.Google Scholar
Van Sliedregt, Elies, Individual Criminal Responsibility in International Law (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Vanderlinden, Jacques, “Le pluralisme juridique: essai de synthèse” in Gilissen, John (ed) Le Pluralisme juridique (Université Libre de Bruxelles 1971) 19–56.Google Scholar
Vanderlinden, Jacques, “Return to Legal Pluralism: Twenty Years Later” (1989) 21 (28) Journal of Legal Pluralism 149–157.Google Scholar
Vasak, Karel, “Was bedeutet die Aussage, ein Staatsvertrag sei ‘self-executing’? – Zum Erkenntnis des Verfassungsgerichtshofs vom 27.6. 1960, B 469/59” (1961) 24 Juristische Blätter 352.Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, Die völkerrechtswidrige Kriegshandlung und der Strafanspruch der Staaten (Engelmann 1920).Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, “Grundlagen und Grundlegungen des Völkerrechts – ein Beitrag zu den Hypothesen des Völkerrechtspositivismus” (1921) 29 Niemeyers Zeitschrift für internationales Recht 65–91.Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, Die Einheit des rechtlichen Weltbildes auf Grundlage der Völkerrechtsverfassung (J C B Mohr 1923).Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft (Springer 1926).Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, “Le fondement du droit international” (1927) 16 Recueil des cours I 247–323.Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, “Droit international public et droit interne” (1954) 32 Revue de Droit International, de Sciences Diplomatiques et Politiques 219.Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, “Das völkerrechtliche Gewohnheitsrecht” (1963) 7 Japanese Annual of International Law 1–7.Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, “Entstehungsweisen und Geltungsgrund des universellen völkerrechtlichen Gewohnheitsrechts” (1969) 29 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 635–653.Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, “Die normative Verknüpfung von Völkerrecht und staatlichem Recht” in Imboden, Max et al (eds) Festschrift für Adolf Julius Merkl zum 80. Geburtstag (Wilhelm Fink 1970) 425–441.Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred and Simma, Bruno, Universelles Völkerrecht – Theorie und Praxis (Duncker & Humblot 3rd ed 1984).Google Scholar
Verhoeven, Maartje, The Costanzo Obligation. The Obligations of National Administrative Authorities in the Case of Incompatibility between National Law and European Law (Intersentia 2011).Google Scholar
Villiger, Mark E, Customary International Law and Treaties: A Study of Their Interactions and Interrelations with Special Consideration of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff 1985).Google Scholar
Villiger, Mark E, “Article 46” in Villiger, Mark E (ed) Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Brill 2009) 583–594.Google Scholar
Vincze, Attila, “Das tschechische Verfassungsgericht stoppt den EuGH. Zum Urteil des tschechischen Verfassungsgerichts Pl. ÚS 5/12 vom 14.2.2012” (2013) 48 (2) Europarecht 194–204.Google Scholar
Vincze, Attila, “Unsere Gedanken sind Sprengstoff – Zum Vorrang des Europarechts in der Rechtsprechung des ungarischen Verfassungsgerichts” (2022) 49 Europäische Grundrechte Zeitschrift 13–21.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Erich, “Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law” (1927) 42 (2) Political Science Quarterly 268–276.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Erich, Der autoritäre Staat. Ein Versuch über das österreichische Staatsproblem (Springer 1997 [1936]).Google Scholar
Von Benda-Beckmann, Franz, “Anthropology and Comparative Law” in von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet and Strijbosch, Fons (eds) Anthropology of Law in the Netherlands (Foris 1966) 90–109.Google Scholar
Von Benda-Beckmann, Franz, “Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism?” (2002) 34 (47) Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 37–83.Google Scholar
Von Benda-Beckmann, Franz and von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet, “The Dynamics of Change and Continuity in Plural Legal Orders” (2006) 53–54 Special double issue of the Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 1–44.Google Scholar
Von Bernstorff, Jochen, The Public International Law Theory of Hans Kelsen: Believing in Universal Law (Cambridge University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, Armin, “Konstitutionalisierung des europäischen öffentlichen Rechts in der europäischen Republik” (2005) 60 (11) JuristenZeitung 529–540.Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, Armin, “Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law” (2008) 6 (3–4) International Journal of Constitutional Law 397–413.Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, Armin, “Common Principles for a Plurality of Orders: A Study on Public Authority in the European Legal Area” (2014) 12 (4) International Journal of Constitutional Law 980–1007.Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, Armin and Schill, Stephan, “Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity under the Lisbon Treaty” (2011) 48 (5) Common Market Law Review 1417–1454.Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, Armin and Sonnevend, Pál (eds) Constitutional Crisis in the European Union. Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania (Hart/Beck 2015).Google Scholar
Von Danwitz, Thomas, “Einheitliche Auslegung und Vorrang des Unionsrechts im Dialog der Gerichte” Verfassunbslog (October 27, 2022), available at https://verfassungsblog.de/einheitliche-auslegung-und-vorrang-des-unionsrechts-im-dialog-der-gerichte/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Von der Pfordten, Dietmar, Rechtsphilosophie. Eine Einführung (CH Beck 2013).Google Scholar
Von Kleist, Heinrich, “An Wilhelmine von Zenge, Berlin, d. 22t März, 1801” [letter to Wilhelmine von Zenge] in Heimböckel, Dieter (ed) Heinrich von Kleist. Sämtliche Briefe (Reclam 1991) 209–215.Google Scholar
Von Rintelen, Fritz-Joachim, “Philosophical Idealism in Germany: The Way from Kant to Hegel and the Present” (1977) 38 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1–32.Google Scholar
Voßkuhle, Andreas, “Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund” (2010) 6 (2) European Constitutional Law Review 175–198.Google Scholar
Voßkuhle, Andreas, “‘European Integration through Law.’ The Contribution of the Federal Constitutional Court” (2017) 58 (1) European Journal of Sociology 145–168.Google Scholar
Voßkuhle, Andreas, “Interview Erfolg ist eher kalt” Die Zeit May 14, 2020.Google Scholar
Vranes, Erich, “Lex superior, lex specialis, lex posterior – Rechtsnatur der ‘Konfliktlösungsregeln’” (2005) 65 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 391–405.Google Scholar
Vranes, Erich, “The Definition of ‘Norm Conflict’ in International Law and Legal Theory” (2006) 17 (2) European Journal of International Law 395–418.Google Scholar
Wagner, Andreas, “Francisco de Vitoria and Alberico Gentili on the Legal Character of the Global Commonwealth” (2011) 31 (3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 565–582.Google Scholar
Wagner, Andreas, “Alberico Gentili: Sovereignty, Natural Law, and the System of Roman Civil Law” in Kadelbach, Stefan, Kleinlein, Thomas and Roth–Isigkeit, David (eds) System, Order, and International Law: The Early History of International Legal Thought from Machiavelli to Hegel (Oxford University Press 2017) 92–114.Google Scholar
Walden, Raphael M, “The Subjective Element in the Formation of Customary International Law” (1977) 12 (3) Israel Law Review 344–364.Google Scholar
Waldock, Humphrey, “The Legal Basis of the Continental Shelf” (1950) 36 Transactions of the Grotius Society 115–148.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement (Oxford University Press 1999).Google Scholar
Walker, Neil, “The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism” (2002) 65 (3) Modern Law Review 317–359.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil, “Late Sovereignty in the European Union” in Walker, Neil (ed) Sovereignty in Transition (Hart 2003) 3–32.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil, Intimations of Global Law (Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Walker, Neil, “Constitutional Pluralism Revisited” (2016) 22 (3) European Law Journal 333–355.Google Scholar
Walter, Christian and Vordermayer, Markus, “Verfassungsidentität als Instrument richterlicher Selbstbeschränkung in transnaitonalen Integrationsprozessen. Vergleichende Überlegungen anhand der Rechtsprechung von EuGH und EGMR” (2015) 63 Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 129–166.Google Scholar
Walter, Maja, “Integrationsgrenze Verfassungsidentität – Konzept und Kontrolle aus europäischer, deutscher und französischer Perspektive” (2012) 72 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 177–200.Google Scholar
Walter, Robert, “Entstehung und Entwicklung des Gedankens der Grundnorm” in Walter, Robert (ed) Schwerpunkte der Reinen Rechtslehre (Manz 1992) 47–59.Google Scholar
Walter, Robert, “Die Grundnorm im System der Reinen Rechtslehre” in Aarnio, Aulis et al (eds) Rechtsnorm und Rechtswirklichkeit: Festschrift für Werner Krawietz (Duncker & Humblot 1993) 53–74.Google Scholar
Waluchow, Wil, “Constitutionalism” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (December 20, 2017), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/constitutionalism/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Walz, Gustav A, Völkerrecht und staatliches Recht: Untersuchung über die Einwirkungen des Völkerrechts auf das innerstaatliche Recht (W Kohlhammer 1933).Google Scholar
Warneken, Felix and Tomasello, Michael, “Varieties of Altruism in Children and Chimpanzees” (2009) 13 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 397–402.Google Scholar
Weber, Karl, Kriterien des Bundesstaates: Eine systematische, historische und rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung der Bundesstaatlichkeit der Schweiz, der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Österreichs (Braumüller 1980).Google Scholar
Weber, Teresa, “Die völkerrechtskonforme Auslegung von Unionsrecht – primär nur bei Sekundärrecht, nur sekundär bei Primärrecht?” (2013) 68 Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 389–416.Google Scholar
Wehberg, Hans, “Pacta Sunt Servanda” (1959) 53 (4) American Journal of International Law 775–786.Google Scholar
Wetz, Kassandra, Funktionen von Verfassungsidentität als gerichtliches Konzept in der Europäischen Union (Mohr Siebeck 2021).Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H H, “Epilogue. The European Courts of Justice: Beyond “Beyond Doctrine” or the Legitimacy Crisis of European Constitutionalism” in Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Stone Sweet, Alex and Weiler, Joseph H H (eds) The European Court and National Courts – Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in its Social Context (Hart 1998) 365–391.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H H, “Europe: The Case against the Case of Statehood” (1998) 4 (1) European Law Journal 43–62.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H H, “Prologue: Global and Pluralist Constitutionalism – Some Doubts” in de Búrca, Graínne and Weiler, Joseph H H (eds) The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2012) 8–18.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H H and Haltern, Ulrich R, “The Autonomy of the Community Legal Order – Through the Looking Glass” (1996) 37 (2) Harvard International Law Journal 411–448.Google Scholar
Weinberger, Ota, Norm und Institution – Eine Einführung in die Theorie des Rechts (Manz 1988).Google Scholar
Weiner, Joan, “Frege and the Linguistic Turn” (1997) 25 (2) Philosophical Topics 265–288.Google Scholar
Weiß, Wolfgang, “Verfassungsanforderungen und Integrationsverantwortung beibeschließenden Vertragsorganen in Freihandelsabkommen” (2016) 27 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 286–291.Google Scholar
Wendel, Mattias, Permeabilität im europäischen Verfassungsrecht: verfassungsrechtliche Integrationsnormen auf Staats- und Unionsebene im Vergleich (Mohr Siebeck 2011).Google Scholar
Wessel, Ramses A, “Reconsidering the Relationship between International and EU Law” in Cannizzaro, Enzo, Palchetti, Paolo and Wessel, Ramses A (eds) International Law as Law of the European Union (Martinus Nijhoff 2012) 7–33.Google Scholar
Wessel, Ramses A, “The EU and International Law” in Wessel, Ramses A and Larik, Joris (eds) EU External Relations Law. Text, Cases and Materials (Hart 2nd ed 2020) 139–174.Google Scholar
Wiederin, Ewald, “Was ist und welche Konsequenzen hat ein Normkonflikt” (1990) 22 Rechtstheorie 311–333.Google Scholar
Wiederin, Ewald, Bundesrecht und Landesrecht. Zugleich ein Beitrag zu Strukturproblemen der bundesstaatlichen Kompetenzverteilung in Österreich und in Deutschland (Springer 1995).Google Scholar
Wiederin, Ewald, “Deutschland über alles: Das Lissabon-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts” (2010) 48 (9) Österreichische Juristenzeitung 398–406.Google Scholar
Wiederin, Ewald, “Der österreichische Verfassungsgerichtshof als Schöpfung Hans Kelsens und sein Modellcharakter als eigenständiges Verfassungsgericht” in Simon, Thomas and Kalowada, Johannes (eds) Schutz der Verfassung: Normen, Institutionen, Höchst- und Verfassungsgerichte (Duncker & Humblot 2013) 283–315.Google Scholar
Wildhaber, Luzius, Treaty-Making Power and Constitution – An International and Comparative Study (Helbing and Lichtenhahn 1971).Google Scholar
Wildhaber, Luzius and Breitenmoser, Stephan, “The Relationship between Customary International Law and Municipal Law in Western European Countries” (1988) 48 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 163–207.Google Scholar
Willey, Thomas A, Back to Kant. The Revival of Kantianism in German Social and Historical Thought 1860–1914 (Wayne State University Press 1978).Google Scholar
Wimmer, Heinz and Perner, Josef, “Beliefs about Beliefs: Representation and Constraining Function of Wrong Beliefs in Young Children’s Understanding of Deception” (1983) 13 (1) Cognition 103–128.Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm, Präludien: Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte Vol I (Mohr 5th ed 1915).Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm, “‘Philosophy of Culture and Transcendental Idealism’ (1910)” in Luft, Sebastian (ed) The Neo-Kantian Reader (translated by Alan Duncan Routledge 2015 [“Kulturphilosophie und transzendentaler Idealismus” in Wilhelm Windelband, Präludien. Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte Vol II (Mohr 5th ed 1915) 279–294]) 317–324.Google Scholar
Winkler, Roland, Integrationsverfassungsrecht: Das österreichische Verfassungsrecht und das Recht der Europäischen Union – Koordination, Kooperation, Konflikt (Springer 2003).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations (translated by G E M Anscombe Basil Blackwell 2nd ed 1958 reprinted 1986 [Philosophische Untersuchungen 1953]).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, On Certainty (translated by G E M Anscombe and Denis Paul and edited by Anscombe, G E M and von Wright, G H Harper 1972 [Über Gewißheit 1969]).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (translated by Kevin C Klement alongside both the Ogden/Ramsey and Pears/McGuinness English translations 2015 [original German Kegan Paul 1922]), available at http://people.umass.edu/klement/tlp/tlp.pdf [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Woleński, Jan, “The History of Epistemology” in Niiniluoto, Ilkka, Sintonen, Matti and Woleński, Jan (eds) Handbook of Epistemology (Springer 2004) 3–54.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan, An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Oxford University Press 1996).Google Scholar
Wolfke, Karol, Custom in Present International Law (Tow Nauk 1964).Google Scholar
Wolfke, Karol, Custom in Present International Law (Springer 2nd ed 1993).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Pichon, Jakob, “Consensus” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Woodman, Gordon R, “Ideological Combat and Social Observation: Recent Debate about Legal Pluralism” (1998) 30 (42) Journal of Legal Pluralism 21–59.Google Scholar
Worster, William T, “The Inductive and Deductive Methods in Customary International Law Analysis: Traditional and Modern Approaches” (2014) 45 (2) Georgetown Journal of International Law 445–521.Google Scholar
Wouters, Dirk, “The External Relations of the European Union Since Lisbon: A Practitioner’s Perspective” in Czuczai, Jenő and Naert, Frederik (eds) The EU as a Global Actor - Bridging Legal Theory and Practice: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Ricardo Gosalbo Bono (Brill Nijhoff 2017) 65–86.Google Scholar
Wouters, Jan, Odermatt, Jed and Ramopoulos, Thomas, “Worlds Apart? Comparing the Approaches of the European Court of Justice and the EU Legislature to International Law” in Cremona, Marise and Thies, Anne (eds) The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law – Constitutional Challenges (Hart 2016) 249–279.Google Scholar
Wouters, Jan A et al (eds) The Law of EU External Relations: Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the EU as an International Legal Actor (Oxford University Press 3rd ed 2021).Google Scholar
Young, James O, “The Coherence Theory of Truth” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (June 26, 2018), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-coherence/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan, Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Zoglauer, Thomas, Normenkonflikte – zur Logik und Rationalität ethischen Argumentierens (Frommann-Holzboog 1998).Google Scholar
Zolo, Danilo, “Hans Kelsen: International Peace through International Law” (1998) 9 (2) European Journal of International Law 306–324.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Lando Kirchmair, Bundeswehr University Munich
  • Book: Rethinking the Relationship between International, EU and National Law
  • Online publication: 29 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009380171.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Lando Kirchmair, Bundeswehr University Munich
  • Book: Rethinking the Relationship between International, EU and National Law
  • Online publication: 29 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009380171.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Lando Kirchmair, Bundeswehr University Munich
  • Book: Rethinking the Relationship between International, EU and National Law
  • Online publication: 29 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009380171.016
Available formats
×