Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:16:54.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Global Perspectives on Lay Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2021

Edited by
Sanja Kutnjak Ivković ,
Shari Seidman Diamond ,
Valerie P. Hans  and
Nancy S. Marder
Sanja Kutnjak Ivković
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Shari Seidman Diamond
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Valerie P. Hans
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Nancy S. Marder
Affiliation:
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts
A Global Perspective
 , pp. 283 - 345
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896).Google Scholar
Asimow, M. (2007). 12 angry men: A revisionist view. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 711–716.Google Scholar
Balashov, A., Gurevich, S. (Producers), & Mikhalkov, N. (Director). (2007). 12 [Motion picture]. Russia: Mosfilm Studios.Google Scholar
Boatright, R. G. (1998). Improving citizen response to jury summonses: A report with recommendations. Chicago: American Judicature Society.Google Scholar
Capra, F. (Producer), & Capra, F. (Director). (1939). Mr. Smith goes to Washington [Motion picture]. United States: Columbia Pictures.Google Scholar
Capra, F. (Producer), & Capra, F.(1946). It’s a wonderful life [Motion picture]. United States: Liberty Films.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, B. (Producer), & Chatterjee, B. (Director). (1986). Ek ruka hua faisla [A pending decision] [Television film]. India: Eagle Home Entertainment.Google Scholar
Clover, C. J. (1998a). Movie juries. DePaul Law Review, 48, 389–405.Google Scholar
Clover, C. J.(1998b). God bless juries! In Browne, N (Ed.), Refiguring American film genres: History and theory (pp. 255–277). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daccache, Z. (Producer), & Daccache, Z. (Director). (2009). 12 angry Lebanese: The documentary [Motion picture]. Lebanon: Catharsis-LCDT.Google Scholar
Davey, M., & Saulny, S. (2010, August 19). Jurors fault complexity of the Blagojevich trial. New York Times, p. A1.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S. (1993). What jurors think: Expectations and reactions of citizens who serve as jurors. In Litan, R. E. (Ed.), Verdict: Assessing the civil jury system (pp. 282–305). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S., Rose, M. R., & Murphy, B. (2006). Revisiting the unanimity requirement: The behavior of the non-unanimous civil jury. Northwestern University Law Review, 100, 201–230.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, P. C. (2003). One inspiring jury. Michigan Law Review, 101, 1387–1407.Google Scholar
Finnegan, W. (1994, January 31). Doubt. New Yorker, pp. 48–67.Google Scholar
Fonda, H., Rose, R. (Producers), & Lumet, S. (Director). (1957). 12 angry men [Motion picture]. United States: Orion-Nova Productions.Google Scholar
Fufang, W. (Executive Producer), & Xu, A. (Director). (2015). 12 citizens [Motion picture]. China: Juben Production Company.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K. (2018, February 14). Can El Chapo get a fair trial? Vice News. https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/7x7x3a/can-el-chapo-get-a-fair-trialGoogle Scholar
Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., Mott, N. L., & Munsterman, G. T. (2002). Are hung juries a problem? Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (1986). Judging the jury. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N.(1991). The American jury at twenty-five years. Law and Social Inquiry, 16, 323–351.Google Scholar
Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jimeno-Bulnes, M. (2007). A different story line for 12 angry men: Verdicts reached by majority rule – The Spanish perspective. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 759–775.Google Scholar
Kahn, H. (Producer), & Kaufman, P. A. (Director). (2010). One angry juror [Television film]. United States: Front Street Pictures and Lifetime Television.Google Scholar
Kalven, H., Jr., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1988). The American jury on trial: Psychological perspectives. New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Landsman, S. (2007). Mad about 12 angry men. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 749–758.Google Scholar
MacKillop, K., & Vidmar, N. (2015). Decision-making in the dark: How pre-trial errors change the narrative in criminal jury trials. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 90, 957–980.Google Scholar
Makinen, J. (2015, September 23). “12 angry men,” 1 happy director; despite some dire predictions, Chinese filmmaker completes remake of US classic. Los Angeles Times, p. E1.Google Scholar
Mangat, L. (2018). A jury of your [redacted]: The rise and implications of anonymous juries. Cornell Law Review, 103, 1621–1649.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S. (2001). Juries and technology: Equipping jurors for the twenty-first century. Brooklyn Law Review, 66, 1257–1299.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S.(2007a). Introduction to the 50th anniversary of 12 angry men. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 557–576.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S.(Ed.). (2007b). Symposium: The 50th anniversary of 12 angry men. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 551–899.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S.(2007c). The banality of evil: A portrayal in 12 angry men. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 887–899.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S.(2011). Two weeks at the Old Bailey: Jury lessons from England. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 86, 537–583.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S.(2018). Juries in film and television. In Pontell, H. N. (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Criminology and Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (2020).Google Scholar
Robinson, J. G., Meledandri, C., & Gordon, M. (Producers), & Gould, H. (Director). (1994). Trial by jury [Motion picture]. United States: Morgan Creek Productions.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1972). Twelve angry men. In Garrett, G. P., Hardison, O. B., & Gelfman, J. R. (Eds.), Film scripts two (pp. 156–337). Milwaukee, WI: Applause Theatre & Cinema Books.Google Scholar
St. Clair, S. (2010, August 27). Blagojevich holdout explains vote. Chicago Tribune, p. 1.Google Scholar
Simon, R. J. (1992). Jury nullification, or prejudice and ignorance in the Marion Barry trial. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 261–266.Google Scholar
Thaman, S. C. (2007). The good, the bad, or the indifferent: 12 angry men in Russia. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 791–808.Google Scholar
United States v. Doherty, 675 F. Supp. 719 (D. Mass. 1987).Google Scholar
Vidmar, N., Beale, S. S., Chemerinsky, E., & Coleman, J. E. (2007). Was he guilty as charged? An alternative narrative based on the circumstantial evidence from 12 angry men. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 691–710.Google Scholar
Warning “intruders.” (1955, October 24). Newsweek, p. 32.Google Scholar
Weisselberg, C. D. (2007). Good film, bad jury. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 717–731.Google Scholar
Winkler, I., & Cowan, R. (Producers), & Gibson, B. (Director). (1996). The juror [Motion picture]. United States: Sony Pictures Entertainment.Google Scholar
Zeisel, H. (1971). … And then there were none: The diminution of the federal jury. University of Chicago Law Review, 38, 710–724.Google Scholar

References

Arlidge, A., & Judge, I. (2014). Magna Carta uncovered. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (2014). The prosecution of organised crime: Removing the jury. International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 18, 83–100.Google Scholar
Coen, M. (2014). “With cat-like tread”: Jury trial and the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 14, 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coen, M., & Doak, J. (2017). Embedding explained jury verdicts in the English criminal trial. Legal Studies, 37, 786–806.Google Scholar
Coen, M., & Howlin, N. (2018). The jury speaks: Jury riders in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. American Journal of Legal History, 58, 505–534.Google Scholar
Coote, A., & Lenaghan, J. (1997). Citizens’ juries: Theory into practice. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Damaška, M. (1973). Evidentiary barriers to conviction and two models of criminal procedure: A comparative study. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 121, 506–589.Google Scholar
Damaška, M.(1974). Structures of authority and comparative criminal procedure. Yale Law Journal, 84, 480–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damaška, M.(1986). The faces of justice and state authority: A comparative approach to the legal process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Damaška, M.(1997). Evidence law adrift. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Damaška, M.(2007). The jury and the law of evidence: Real and imagined interconnections. Law, Probability and Risk, 5, 255–265.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (2008). Reflections on the hybridisation of criminal procedure. In Jackson, J, Langer, M, & Tillers, P (Eds.), Crime, procedure and evidence in a comparative and international context: Essays in honour of Mirjan Damaška. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Duff, A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S., & Tadros, V. (2007). The trial on trial (3): Towards a normative theory of the criminal trial. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Duff, P. (1999). The Scottish criminal jury: A very peculiar institution. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62, 173–201.Google Scholar
Esmein, A. (1913). A history of continental criminal procedure: With special reference to France. Trans. J. Simpson. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Gallagher, C. & Ferguson, A. (2018, March 30). Belfast rape trial juror’s online comments are referred to AG. Irish Times. www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/belfast-rape-trial-juror-s-online-comments-are-referred-to-ag-1.3445059Google Scholar
Gorphe, F. (1937). Reforms of the jury-system in Europe: France and other continental countries. American Institute of Criminal Law & Criminology, 27, 155–168.Google Scholar
Grande, E. (2008). Dances of criminal justice: Thoughts on systemic differences and the search for truth. In Jackson, J, Langer, M, & Tillers, P (Eds.), Crime, procedure and evidence in a comparative and international context: Essays in honour of Mirjan Damaška. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Grande, E.(2016). Legal transplants and the inoculation effect: How American criminal procedure has affected continental Europe. American Journal of Comparative Law, 6, 583–618.Google Scholar
Hans, V., & Germain, C. M. (2011). The French jury at a crossroads. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 86, 737–768.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. (2006). Conceptions of the trial in inquisitorial and adversarial procedure. In Duff, A, Farmer, L, Marshall, S, & Tadros, V (Eds.), The trial on trial (2): Judgment and calling to account. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D. (2002a). Modes of trial: Shifting the balance towards the professional judge. Criminal Law Review, 4, 249–271.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D.(2002b). Making juries accountable. American Journal of Comparative Law, 50, 477–530.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D.(2009). Many years on in Northern Ireland: The Diplock legacy. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 60, 213–229.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D.(2016). Unbecoming jurors and unreasoned verdicts: Realising integrity in the jury room. In Dixon, D, Hunter, J, Roberts, P, & Young, S (Eds.), The integrity of criminal process: From theory into practice. Oxford: Hart/Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D., & Doran, S. (1995). Judge without jury: Diplock trials in the adversary system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D., & Kovalev, N. P. (2006). Lay adjudication and human rights in Europe. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 83–123.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D., & Kovalev, N. P.(2016). Lay adjudication in Europe: The rise and fall of the traditional jury. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 6. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2782413Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D., & Summers, S. J. (2012). The internationalisation of criminal evidence: Beyond the common law and civil law traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaconelli, J. (2002). Open justice: A critique of the public trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koch, A. (2000). CJA Mittermaier and the 19th century debate about juries and mixed courts. Revue International de Droit Penal, 72, 347–353.Google Scholar
Langer, M. (2004). From legal transplants to legal translations: The globalization of plea bargaining and the Americanization thesis in criminal procedure. Harvard International Journal, 45, 1–64.Google Scholar
Langer, M.(2014). The long shadow of the adversarial and inquisitorial categories. In Dubber, M. D. & Höernle, T (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leib, E. (2008). A comparison of criminal jury decision rules in democratic countries. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 5, 629–644.Google Scholar
Lempert, R. O. (2001). Citizen participation in judicial decision making: Juries, lay judges and Japan. Saint Louis-Warsaw Transatlantic Law Journal, 1–14.Google Scholar
Leveson, B. (2015). Review of efficiency in criminal proceedings. London: Judiciary of England and Wales.Google Scholar
Lippke, R. L. (2009). The case for reasoned verdicts. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 22, 313–330.Google Scholar
Lundmark, T. (2012). Charting the divide between the common and civil law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mannheim, H. (1937). Trial by jury in modern continental law. Law Quarterly Review, 53, 99–117, 388–412.Google Scholar
Pocar, F., & Carter, L. (2013). International criminal procedure: The interface of civil law and common law legal systems. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Quinn, C. (2004). Jury bias and the European Convention on Human Rights: A well-kept secret? Criminal Law Review, 998–1014.Google Scholar
Fanning, R. v. [2016] 1 WLR 4175 (Eng.).Google Scholar
R. v. H [1995] 2 AC 596 (Eng.).Google Scholar
Mirza, R. v. [2004] 1 AC 1118 (Eng.).Google Scholar
Pope, R. v. [2013] 1 Cr App R 214 (Eng.).Google Scholar
Thompson, R v. [2011] 1 WLR 200 (Eng.).Google Scholar
Roberts, P., & Zuckerman, A. (2010). Criminal evidence. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. (2018). Post-conviction review in England and Wales: Perpetuating and rectifying miscarriages of justice. In Lennon, G, King, C, & McCartney, C (Eds.), Counter-terrorism, constitutionalism and miscarriages of justice. Oxford: Hart/Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sander v. UK, 31 EHRR 44 (2000).Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (2006). On the supposed jury-dependence of evidence law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155, 165–202.Google Scholar
Sikich, K. W. (2013). Explaining the presence of the criminal jury in democratic political systems. Doctoral dissertation, American University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. (2011). Jury trial in Austria. New Criminal Law Review, 14, 281–325.Google Scholar
Taxquet v. Belgium, Application No. 926/05 (January 13, 2009).Google Scholar
Taxquet v. Belgium, 54 EHRR 26 (GC) (2012).Google Scholar
Thaman, S. C. (1998). Spain returns to trial by jury. Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, 21, 241–537.Google Scholar
Thaman, S. C.(2007). The nullification of the Russian jury: Lessons for jury-inspired reform in Eurasia and beyond. Cornell International Law Journal, 40, 355–428.Google Scholar
Thaman, S. C.(2011). Should criminal juries give reasons for their verdicts? Chicago-Kent Law Review, 86, 613–668.Google Scholar
Thayer, W. B. (1898). A preliminary treatise on evidence at the common law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. (2010). Are juries fair? London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Thomas, C.(2013). Avoiding the perfect storm of juror contempt. Criminal Law Review, 483–503.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. (2004). Trial by jury: 50 years of change. Criminal Law Review, 119–137.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. de (1835/1994). Democracy in America. London: David Campbell.Google Scholar
Vidmar, N. (Ed.). (2000). World jury systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
VRP, VPC and others v. Nicaragua, Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ser. C) No. 350 (2018, March 8).Google Scholar
Weigend, T. (2003). Is the criminal process about truth?: A German perspective. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 26, 157–173.Google Scholar
Weigend, T.(2011). Should we search for the truth, and who should do it? North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 36, 389–411.Google Scholar

References

Abel, R. L., & Lewis, P. S. C. (Eds.). (1995). Lawyers in society: An overview. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J., & McConville, M. (1979). Jury trials. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bracey, D. (2006). Exploring law and culture. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Burd, K. A., & Hans, V. P. (2018). Reasoned verdicts: Oversold? Cornell International Law Journal, 51, 319–360.Google Scholar
CIA World Factbook. (2019). www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tt.htmlGoogle Scholar
Colvin, E. (2004). Criminal procedure in the South Pacific. Journal of South Pacific Law, 8(1). www.paclii.org/journals/fJSPL/vol08no1/1.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Diamond, S. S. (1990). Revising images of public punitiveness: Sentencing by lay and professional English magistrates. Law & Social Inquiry, 15, 191–221.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S., & Rose, M. R. (2018). The contemporary American jury. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14, 239–258.Google Scholar
Galanter, M. (2004). The vanishing trial: An examination of trials and related matters in federal and state courts. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1, 459–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740–1461.2004.00014.xGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, K. (2018, May 29). Countries that recognize Taiwan. WorldAtlas.com. www.worldatlas.com/articles/which-countries-recognize-taiwan-as-a-country.htmlGoogle Scholar
Grant, B., & Schwikkard, P. (1991). People’s courts? South African Journal on Human Rights, 7, 304–316.Google Scholar
Green, T. A. (1985). Verdict according to conscience: Perspectives on the English criminal trial jury 1200–1800. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hans, V. P. (2008). Jury systems around the world. Annual Review of Law & Social Science, 4, 275–297.Google Scholar
Hans, V. P., Fukurai, H., Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Park, J. (2017). Global juries: A plan for research. In Kovera, M. B. (Ed.), The psychology of juries: Current knowledge and a research agenda for the future (pp. 131–157). Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
Hans, V. P., & Germain, C. (2011). The French jury at a crossroads. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 86, 737–768.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D., & Kovalev, N. P. (2006). Lay adjudication and human rights in Europe. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 83–123.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D., & Kovalev, N. P.(2016). Lay adjudication in Europe: The rise and fall of the traditional jury. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 6, 368–395. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2782413Google Scholar
Kovalev, N. P. (2010). Criminal justice reform in Russia, Ukraine and the Former Republics of the Soviet Union: Trial by jury and mixed courts. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Kovalev, N. P.(2014). Selection of jurors and lay assessors in comparative perspective: Eurasian context. Russian Law Journal, 11(2), 9–62.Google Scholar
Kritzer, H. M. (Ed.). (2002). Legal systems of the world: A political, social, and cultural encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Kutnjak Ivković, S. (1999). Lay participation in criminal trials: The case of Croatia. Lanham, MD: Austin & Winfield.Google Scholar
Lahav, A. (2017). In praise of litigation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langbein, J. H., Lerner, R. L., & Smith, B. P. (2009). History of the common law: The development of Anglo-American legal institutions. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Le jury dans le procès pénal au XXI siècle [The lay participation in the criminal trial in the XXIst century]. (2001). Revue Internationale de Droit Penal (International Review of Penal Law), 72, 1 & 2 trimesters.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Bostock, S., & Thomas, C. (2000). The continuing decline of the English jury. In Vidmar, N (Ed.), World jury systems (pp. 53–91). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malsch, M. (2009). Democracy in the courts: Lay participation in European criminal justice systems. Farnham, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S. (forthcoming). The power of the jury: Transforming citizens into jurors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S., & Hans, V. P. (2015). Introduction to juries and lay participation: American perspectives and global trends. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 90, 789–824.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S., & Hans, V. P.(2016). Introduction to juries and mixed tribunals across the globe: New developments, common challenges and future directions. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 6, 163–178. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2785708Google Scholar
Park, R. Y. (2010). The globalizing jury trial: Lessons and insights from Korea. American Journal of Comparative Law, 58, 525–582.Google Scholar
Provine, D. M. (1986). Judging credentials: Nonlawyer judges and the politics of professionalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quigley, J. (1989). Socialist law and the civil law tradition. American Journal of Comparative Law, 37, 781–808.Google Scholar
Reichel, P. L. (2008). Comparative criminal justice systems: A topical approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Salas, L. (1983). The emergence and decline of the Cuban popular courts. Law & Society Review, 17, 587–612.Google Scholar
Belgium, Taxquet v., Application No. 926/05 (2010). www.legal-tools.org/doc/a77480/pdfGoogle Scholar
Thaman, S. C. (2001). The idea of the conference. International Review of Penal Law, 72, 19–23.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. A. (2016). The missing American jury. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vidmar, N. (1999). The common law jury. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
Vidmar, N.(Ed.). (2000). World jury systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vidmar, N.(2002). Juries and lay assessors in the Commonwealth: A contemporary survey. Criminal Law Forum, 13, 385–407.Google Scholar
Vidmar, N., & Hans, V. P. (2007). American juries: The verdict. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Vogler, R. (2005). A world view of criminal justice. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Voigt, S. (2009). The effects of lay participation in courts: A cross-country analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 327–339. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.02.005Google Scholar
World Atlas. (2019). www.worldatlas.com/cntycont.htmGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×