Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:24:19.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Predicting the Outcome of Surgical Interventions for Epilepsy Using Imaging Biomarkers

from Part III - Predicting the Response to Therapeutic Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2019

By
Clarissa Lin Yasuda ,
Ana Carolina Coan ,
Marina K. Alvim  and
Fernando Cendes
Edited by
Andrea Bernasconi ,
Neda Bernasconi  and
Matthias Koepp
Andrea Bernasconi
Affiliation:
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University
Neda Bernasconi
Affiliation:
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University
Matthias Koepp
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, University College London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Imaging Biomarkers in Epilepsy , pp. 169 - 180
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

de Tisi, J, Bell, GS, Peacock, JL, et al. The long-term outcome of adult epilepsy surgery, patterns of seizure remission, and relapse: a cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378:1388–95.Google Scholar
Bonilha, L, Keller, SS. Quantitative MRI in refractory temporal lobe epilepsy: relationship with surgical outcomes. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2015;5:204–24.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, A, Bernasconi, N, Bernhardt, BC, et al. Advances in MRI for “cryptogenic” epilepsies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7:99–108.Google Scholar
Yasuda, CL, Cendes, F. Neuroimaging for the prediction of response to medical and surgical treatment in epilepsy. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2012;6:295–308.Google Scholar
West, S, Nolan, SJ, Cotton, J, et al. Surgery for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD010541.Google Scholar
Keller, SS, Richardson, MP, Schoene-Bake, JC, et al. Thalamotemporal alteration and postoperative seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:760–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, JJ, Salamon, N, Dutton, RA, et al. Three-dimensional preoperative maps of hippocampal atrophy predict surgical outcomes in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2005;65:1094–7.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, BC, Kim, H, Bernasconi, N. Patterns of subregional mesiotemporal disease progression in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2013;81:1840–7.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, BC, Hong, SJ, Bernasconi, A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging pattern learning in temporal lobe epilepsy: classification and prognostics. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:436–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doucet, GE, He, X, Sperling, M, et al. Frontal gray matter abnormalities predict seizure outcome in refractory temporal lobe epilepsy patients. NeuroImage Clin. 2015;9:458–66.Google Scholar
Feis, DL, Schoene-Bake, JC, Elger, C, et al. Prediction of post-surgical seizure outcome in left mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. NeuroImage Clin. 2013;2:903–11.Google Scholar
Yasuda, CL, Valise, C, Saude, AV, et al. Dynamic changes in white and gray matter volume are associated with outcome of surgical treatment in temporal lobe epilepsy. NeuroImage. 2010;49:71–9.Google Scholar
Wang, ZI, Jones, SE, Jaisani, Z, et al. Voxel-based morphometric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) postprocessing in MRI-negative epilepsies. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:1060–75.Google Scholar
Leach, JL, Miles, L, Henkel, DM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in the resection region correlate with histopathological type, gliosis extent, and postoperative outcome in pediatric cortical dysplasia. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;14:68–80.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, BC, Bernasconi, N, Concha, L, et al. Cortical thickness analysis in temporal lobe epilepsy: reproducibility and relation to outcome. Neurology. 2010;74:1776–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernhardt, BC, Chen, Z, He, Y, et al. Graph-theoretical analysis reveals disrupted small-world organization of cortical thickness correlation networks in temporal lobe epilepsy. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21:2147–57.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, BC, Bernasconi, N, Hong, SJ, et al. Subregional mesiotemporal network topology is altered in temporal lobe epilepsy. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26:3237–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaulieu, C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system—a technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002;15:435–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, DW. Diffusion tensor imaging in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011;52(suppl 4):32–4.Google Scholar
Goncalves Pereira, PM, Oliveira, E, Rosado, P. Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of the hippocampus and the amygdala in pharmaco-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:671–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Bernhardt, BC, Bonilha, L, Gross, DW. Network analysis for a network disorder: the emerging role of graph theory in the study of epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;50:162–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilha, L, Helpern, JA, Sainju, R, et al. Presurgical connectome and postsurgical seizure control in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2013;81:1704–10.Google Scholar
Bonilha, L, Jensen, JH, Baker, N, et al. The brain connectome as a personalized biomarker of seizure outcomes after temporal lobectomy. Neurology. 2015;84:1846–53.Google Scholar
Munsell, BC, Wee, CY, Keller, SS, et al. Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for treatment outcome prediction in patients with epilepsy based on structural connectome data. NeuroImage. 2015;118:219–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchings, F, Han, CE, Keller, SS, et al. Predicting surgery targets in temporal lobe epilepsy through structural connectome based simulations. PLOS Comput Biol. 2015;11:e1004642.Google Scholar
Cendes, F, Knowlton Robert, C, Novotny, E, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in epilepsy: clinical issues. Epilepsia. 2002;43:32–9.Google Scholar
Duncan, JS. Imaging in the surgical treatment of epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:537–50.Google Scholar
Struck, AF, Hall, LT, Floberg, JM, et al. Surgical decision making in temporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison of [(18)F]FDG-PET, MRI, and EEG. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;22:293–7.Google Scholar
Burneo, JG, Poon, R, Kellett, S, et al. The utility of positron emission tomography in epilepsy. Can J Neurol Sci. 2015;42:360–71.Google Scholar
Wehner, T, Lüders, H. Role of neuroimaging in the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. J Clin Neurol. 2008;4:1–16.Google Scholar
LoPinto-Khoury, C, Sperling, MR, Skidmore, C, et al. Surgical outcome in PET-positive, MRI-negative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2012;53:342–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yankam Njiwa, J, Gray, KR, Costes, N, et al. Advanced [(18)F]FDG and [(11)C]flumazenil PET analysis for individual outcome prediction after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery for hippocampal sclerosis. NeuroImage Clin. 2015;7:122–31.Google Scholar
Choi, JY, Kim, SJ, Hong, SB, et al. Extratemporal hypometabolism on FDG PET in temporal lobe epilepsy as a predictor of seizure outcome after temporal lobectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:581–7.Google Scholar
Dupont, S, Semah, F, Clemenceau, S, et al. Accurate prediction of postoperative outcome in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: a study using positron emission tomography with 18fluorodeoxyglucose. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:1331–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, CH, Bleasel, A, Wen, L, et al. The topography and significance of extratemporal hypometabolism in refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy examined by FDG-PET. Epilepsia. 2010;51:1365–73.Google Scholar
Vinton, AB, Carne, R, Hicks, RJ, et al. The extent of resection of FDG-PET hypometabolism relates to outcome of temporal lobectomy. Brain. 2007;130:548–60.Google Scholar
Carne, RP, O’Brien, TJ, Kilpatrick, CJ, et al. MRI-negative PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy: a distinct surgically remediable syndrome. Brain. 2004;127:2276–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandra, PS, Salamon, N, Huang, J, et al. FDG-PET/MRI coregistration and diffusion-tensor imaging distinguish epileptogenic tubers and cortex in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: a preliminary report. Epilepsia. 2006;47:1543–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yun, CH, Lee, SK, Lee, SY, et al. Prognostic factors in neocortical epilepsy surgery: multivariate analysis. Epilepsia. 2006;47:574–9.Google Scholar
Chassoux, F, Rodrigo, S, Semah, F, et al. FDG-PET improves surgical outcome in negative MRI Taylor-type focal cortical dysplasias. Neurology. 2010;75:2168–75.Google Scholar
Knowlton, RC, Elgavish, RA, Bartolucci, A, et al. Functional imaging: II. Prediction of epilepsy surgery outcome. Ann Neurol. 2008;64:35–41.Google Scholar
Lee, SK, Lee, SY, Kim, KK, et al. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of cryptogenic neocortical epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:525–32.Google Scholar
Koepp, MJ, Woermann, FG. Imaging structure and function in refractory focal epilepsy. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:42–53.Google Scholar
Juhasz, C, Asano, E, Shah, A, et al. Focal decreases of cortical GABAA receptor binding remote from the primary seizure focus: what do they indicate? Epilepsia. 2009;50:240–50.Google Scholar
Chugani, HT, Luat, AF, Kumar, A, et al. alpha-[11C]-methyl-L-tryptophan–PET in 191 patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Neurology. 2013;81:674–80.Google Scholar
Chugani, HT, Kumar, A, Kupsky, W, et al. Clinical and histopathologic correlates of 11C-alpha-methyl-L-tryptophan (AMT) PET abnormalities in children with intractable epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011;52:1692–8.Google Scholar
Dupont, P, Van Paesschen, W, Palmini, A, et al. Ictal perfusion patterns associated with single MRI-visible focal dysplastic lesions: implications for the noninvasive delineation of the epileptogenic zone. Epilepsia. 2006;47:1550–7.Google Scholar
O’Brien, TJ, So, EL, Cascino, GD, et al. Subtraction SPECT coregistered to MRI in focal malformations of cortical development: localization of the epileptogenic zone in epilepsy surgery candidates. Epilepsia. 2004;45:367–76.Google ScholarPubMed
Tepmongkol, S, Tangtrairattanakul, K, Lerdlum, S, et al. Comparison of brain perfusion SPECT parameters accuracy for seizure localization in extratemporal lobe epilepsy with discordant pre-surgical data. Ann Nucl Med. 2015;29:21–8.Google Scholar
Krsek, P, Kudr, M, Jahodova, A, et al. Localizing value of ictal SPECT is comparable to MRI and EEG in children with focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsia. 2013;54:351–8.Google Scholar
Kazemi, NJ, Worrell, GA, Stead, SM, et al. Ictal SPECT statistical parametric mapping in temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. Neurology. 2010;74:70–6.Google Scholar
McNally, KA, Paige, AL, Varghese, G, et al. Localizing value of ictal-interictal SPECT analyzed by SPM (ISAS). Epilepsia. 2005;46:1450–64.Google Scholar
Sulc, V, Stykel, S, Hanson, DP, et al. Statistical SPECT processing in MRI-negative epilepsy surgery. Neurology. 2014;82:932–9.Google Scholar
Ogawa, S, Tank, DW, Menon, R, et al. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5951–5.Google Scholar
Biswal, BB. Resting state fMRI: a personal history. NeuroImage. 2012;62:938–44.Google Scholar
Zhang, CH, Lu, Y, Brinkmann, B, et al. Lateralization and localization of epilepsy related hemodynamic foci using presurgical fMRI. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126:27–38.Google Scholar
Negishi, M, Martuzzi, R, Novotny, EJ, et al. Functional MRI connectivity as a predictor of the surgical outcome of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011;52:1733–40.Google Scholar
Bagshaw, AP, Kobayashi, E, Dubeau, F, et al. Correspondence between EEG-fMRI and EEG dipole localisation of interictal discharges in focal epilepsy. NeuroImage. 2006;30:417–25.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, E, Hawco, CS, Grova, C, et al. Widespread and intense BOLD changes during brief focal electrographic seizures. Neurology. 2006;66:1049–55.Google Scholar
Thornton, R, Laufs, H, Rodionov, R, et al. EEG correlated functional MRI and postoperative outcome in focal epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:922–7.Google Scholar
Morgan, VL, Sonmezturk, HH, Gore, JC, et al. Lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy using resting functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity of hippocampal networks. Epilepsia. 2012;53:1628–35.Google Scholar
Coan, AC, Chaudhary, UJ, Grouiller, F, et al. EEG-fMRI in the presurgical evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:642–9.Google Scholar
Elshoff, L, Groening, K, Grouiller, F, et al. The value of EEG-fMRI and EEG source analysis in the presurgical setup of children with refractory focal epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2012;53:1597–606.Google Scholar
An, D, Fahoum, F, Hall, J, et al. Electroencephalography/functional magnetic resonance imaging responses help predict surgical outcome in focal epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2013;54:2184–94.Google Scholar
Michel, CM, Lantz, G, Spinelli, L, et al. 128-channel EEG source imaging in epilepsy: clinical yield and localization precision. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;21:71–83.Google Scholar
Plummer, C, Harvey, AS, Cook, M. EEG source localization in focal epilepsy: where are we now? Epilepsia. 2008;49:201–18.Google Scholar
Zumsteg, D, Friedman, A, Wieser, HG, et al. Propagation of interictal discharges in temporal lobe epilepsy: correlation of spatiotemporal mapping with intracranial foramen ovale electrode recordings. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:2615–26.Google Scholar
Gavaret, M, Badier, JM, Marquis, P, et al. Electric source imaging in temporal lobe epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;21:267–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavaret, M, Badier, JM, Marquis, P, et al. Electric source imaging in frontal lobe epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;23:358–70.Google Scholar
Feng, R, Hu, J, Pan, L, et al. Application of 256-channel dense array electroencephalographic source imaging in presurgical workup of temporal lobe epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127:108–16.Google Scholar
Megevand, P, Spinelli, L, Genetti, M, et al. Electric source imaging of interictal activity accurately localises the seizure onset zone. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:38–43.Google Scholar
Russo, A, Jayakar, P, Lallas, M, et al. The diagnostic utility of 3D electroencephalography source imaging in pediatric epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2016;57:24–31.Google Scholar
Brodbeck, V, Spinelli, L, Lascano, AM, et al. Electroencephalographic source imaging: a prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients. Brain. 2011;134:2887–97.Google Scholar
Lascano, AM, Perneger, T, Vulliemoz, S, et al. Yield of MRI, high-density electric source imaging (HD-ESI), SPECT and PET in epilepsy surgery candidates. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127:150–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heers, M, Hedrich, T, An, D, et al. Spatial correlation of hemodynamic changes related to interictal epileptic discharges with electric and magnetic source imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35:4396–414.Google Scholar
Tanaka, N, Peters, JM, Prohl, AK, et al. Clinical value of magnetoencephalographic spike propagation represented by spatiotemporal source analysis: correlation with surgical outcome. Epilepsy Res. 2014;108:280–8.Google Scholar
Knowlton, RC. Can magnetoencephalography aid epilepsy surgery? Epilepsy Curr. 2008;8:1–5.Google Scholar
Eliashiv, DS, Elsas, SM, Squires, K, et al. Ictal magnetic source imaging as a localizing tool in partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2002;59:1600–10.Google Scholar
Knowlton, RC. The role of FDG-PET, ictal SPECT, and MEG in the epilepsy surgery evaluation. Epilepsy Behav. 2006;8:91–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oishi, M, Kameyama, S, Masuda, H, et al. Single and multiple clusters of magnetoencephalographic dipoles in neocortical epilepsy: significance in characterizing the epileptogenic zone. Epilepsia. 2006;47:355–64.Google Scholar
Wheless, JW, Willmore, LJ, Breier, JI, et al. A comparison of magnetoencephalography, MRI, and V-EEG in patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 1999;40:931–41.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, M, Nakasato, N, Shamoto, H, et al. Surgical implications of neuromagnetic spike localization in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2002;43:415–24.Google Scholar
Stefan, H, Hummel, C, Scheler, G, et al. Magnetic brain source imaging of focal epileptic activity: a synopsis of 455 cases. Brain. 2003;126:2396–405.Google Scholar
Genow, A, Hummel, C, Scheler, G, et al. Epilepsy surgery, resection volume and MSI localization in lesional frontal lobe epilepsy. NeuroImage. 2004;21:444–9.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×