Medical libraries

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521781947.022

19 - Medical libraries

from Part Three - Tools of the trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Peter Jones

Edited by

Elisabeth Leedham-Green and

Teresa Webber

Show author details

Elisabeth Leedham-Green: Affiliation:
Darwin College, Cambridge
Teresa Webber: Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Early British medical libraries owned by practitioners of medicine are not easily distinguished from those owned by persons with a purely theoretical interest in medicine. This is not just a function of our ignorance about the owners of these books – although it is true that we may not know enough to characterise them – but reflects the difficulty of drawing hard and fast lines between theory and practice of medicine. Almost all of the men who can be identified as possessing medical degrees from Oxford, Cambridge and the Scottish or other European universities are known to have practised as well as taught medicine. Conversely, those book-owners we can identify as surgeons or unlicensed medical practitioners did not keep in their libraries books which were of a kind noticeably different from those owned by the university trained men. Both licensed and unlicensed practitioners might own recipe-books, or herbals, or texts on surgery and the medical practica. So too with institutions, monastic houses, colleges or gilds of practitioners – they often seem to have owned medical books that reflected both the curriculum of the university medical school and the exigencies of medical treatment of patients.

The most important distinctions that can be drawn in respect of medical libraries are linguistic. Some owners had only books that were in English, in Gaelic or in Welsh. The overwhelming majority of medical libraries in the early period, however, were made up wholly of books in Latin. If other languages were represented in these Latin-dominated libraries, they were French, Italian or German books, rather than English.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Libraries in Britain and Ireland , pp. 461 - 471

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521781947.022 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bannerman, J., The Beatons: a medical kindred in the classical Gaelic tradition (Edinburgh, 1986).Google Scholar

Beck, R. T., The cutting edge: early history of the surgeons of London (London, 1974).Google Scholar

Cargill Thompson, W. D. J., ‘Notes on King’s College library 1500–1570, in particular for the period of the Reformation’, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society 2 (1954).Google Scholar

de la Mare, A. C., and Gillam, S. (eds.), Duke Humfrey’s library and the divinity school, 1488–1988 (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar

Durling, R. J., ‘Girolamo Mercuriale’s De modo studendi’, Osiris, 2nd ser., 6 (1990).CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gaskell, [J.] P., Trinity College library: the first 150 years (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar

Getz, F., ‘Medical practitioners in medieval England’, Social History of Medicine 3 (1990).CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Grierson, P., ‘John Caius’ library’, in Biographical history of Gonville and Caius College, VII (1978).Google Scholar

Hunter, M. (ed.), Archives of the scientific revolution: the formation and exchange of ideas in seventeenth-century Europe (Woodbridge, 1998).Google Scholar

Jones, P. M., ‘Reading medicine in Tudor Cambridge’, in Nutton, V., and Porter, R. (eds.), The history of medical education in Britain (Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA, 1995).Google Scholar

Jones, P. M., ‘Medical libraries and medical Latin 1400–1700’, in Bracke, W. and Deumens, H. (eds.), Medical Latin from the late middle ages to the eighteenth century (Brussels, 2000).Google Scholar

Lovatt, R., ‘Two collegiate loan chests in late medieval Cambridge’, in Zutshi, P. (ed.), Medieval Cambridge: essays on the pre-Reformation university (Woodbridge, 1993).Google Scholar

Owen, M. E., ‘The medical books of medieval Wales and the physicians of Myddfai’, The Carmarthenshire Antiquary 31 (1995).Google Scholar

Peachey, C. C., ‘The bookplates of medical men’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 23 (1930).Google Scholar

Philip, I. G., The Bodleian Library in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar

Powicke, F. M., The medieval books of Merton College (Oxford, 1931).Google Scholar

Reed, A. W., ‘John Clement and his books’, Library, 4th ser., 6 (1926).Google Scholar

Stern, V. F., Gabriel Harvey: his life, marginalia and library (Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar

Talbot, C. H., and Hammond, E. A., The medical practitioners inmedieval England:a biographical register (London, 1965).Google Scholar

Voigts, L. E., ‘Scientific and medical books’, in Griffiths, J. and Pearsall, D. A. (eds.), Book production and publishing in Britain, 1375–1475 (Cambridge, 1989).Google Scholar

Voigts, L. E., ‘A doctor and his books: the manuscripts of Roger Marchall’, in Beadle, R. and Piper, A. J. (eds.), New science out of old books: studies in manuscripts and early printed books in honour of A. I. Doyle (Aldershot, 1995).Google Scholar