International law as law

doi:10.1017/CCO9781139035651.006

3 - International law as law

from Part I - The contexts of international law

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2015

Frédéric Mégret

Edited by

James Crawford and

Martti Koskenniemi

Show author details

Frédéric Mégret: Affiliation:
McGill University
James Crawford: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martti Koskenniemi: Affiliation:
University of Helsinki

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

What is the character of international law as a legal system? How different is international law from municipal law? Is this difference significant or is it made into more than is justified? What consequences flow from international law being a distinct legal system in terms of its practice and prospects?

International law as a discipline has exhibited an unusual propensity to ask such questions, perhaps because, historically and politically, this has often seemed less a matter of course than for domestic legal orders. In truth the debate about international law as law covers three distinct though related questions. The first deals with what type of legal system international law is. It is immediately quite clear that international law operates differently from domestic law. But to what extent is it a sui generis legal system? Second is the rather more ominous question of whether, on the basis of its defining characteristics, international law can even qualify as ‘law’ properly so called. Confronted with widely publicised and spectacular violations of international law, popular opinion is often tempted to give up on the idea, yet international law is routinely treated as law by its practitioners. Why this disjunction? Third, one of the difficulties in determining what sort of law international law is, or whether it is law at all, is that it is a constantly evolving legal system that has seemingly taken many different shapes over time. Is international law so changeable that it lacks the minimum stability a legal order should have, or is it instead remarkably constant over time despite the appearance of constant renewal?

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Companion to International Law , pp. 64 - 92

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139035651.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abi-Saab, G., 1996. ‘Cours général de droit internationale public’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international, 207(I), 1–463Google Scholar

Anghie, A., 1996. ‘Francisco de Vitoria and the Colonial Origins of International Law’, Social & Legal Studies, 5(4), 321–336CrossRef Google Scholar

Anghie, A., 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Austin, J., 1875. Lectures on Jurisprudence, Or, The Philosophy of Positive Law, Campbell, R. (ed.), New York: Henry HoltGoogle Scholar

Austin, J., 1995. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, Rumble, W. (ed.), Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Brunnée, J. and Toope, S., 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account, Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Buchanan, A., 2007. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-determination: Moral Foundations for International Law, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Bull, H., 2002. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Carr, E. H., 1946. The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919–1939, 2nd edn., London: MacmillanCrossRef Google Scholar

Cassese, A., 1999. ‘Ex iniuria ius oritur: Are We Moving towards International Legitimation of Forcible Humanitarian Counter-measures in the World Community?’, European Journal of International Law, 10(1), 23–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, J. L., 2004. ‘Whose Sovereignty? Empire versus International Law’, Ethics & International Affairs, 18(3), 1–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Franck, T., 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Friedmann, W., 1964. The Changing Structure of International Law, New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Friedrichs, J., 2001. ‘The Meaning of New Medievalism’, European Journal of International Relations, 7(4), 475–501CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. and Posner, E., 2005. The Limits of International Law, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Henkin, L., 1979. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Higgins, R., 1995. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It, Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Kant, I., 1970. ‘Perpetual Peace’, in Political Writings, Reiss, Hans (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 93–130Google Scholar

Keene, E., 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., 1967. Pure Theory of Law, New York: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Klabbers, J., Peters, A. and Ulfstein, G., 2009. The Constitutionalisation of International Law, Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Koh, H., 1998. ‘How is International Human Rights Law Enforced?’, Indiana Law Journal, 74, 1397–1417Google Scholar

Korhonen, O., 1996. ‘Liberalism and International Law: A Centre Projecting a Periphery’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 65, 481–532CrossRef Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., 2001. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., 2005. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Reissue with a New Epilogue, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Krisch, N. and Kingsbury, B., 2006. ‘Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order’, European Journal of International Law, 17(1), 1–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Lasswell, H. and McDougal, M., 1992. Jurisprudence for a Free Society: Studies in Law, Science, and Policy, Leiden: Martinus NijhoffGoogle Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., 1932. ‘The Nature of International Law and General Jurisprudence’, Economica, 37, 301–320CrossRef Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., 1946. ‘The Grotian Tradition in International Law’, British Yearbook of International Law, 23(1), 1–53Google Scholar

Marks, S., 2003. ‘Empire’s Law’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 10(1), 449–466CrossRef Google Scholar

Mathews, J. T., 1997. ‘Power Shift’, Foreign Affairs, 76(1), 50–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Mégret, F., 2008. ‘Globalisation’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, online

Nardin, T., 1988. ‘Legal Positivism as a Theory of International Society’, in Mapel, D. and Nardin, T. (eds.), International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives, Princeton University Press, 17–35Google Scholar

Oakeshott, M., 1991. On Human Conduct, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J., 2001. The Law of Peoples: With, The Idea of Public Reason Revisited, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Rorty, R., 1993. ‘Human Rights, Rationality and Sentimentality’, in Shute, S. and Hurley, S. (eds.), On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, New York: Basic Books, 111–135Google Scholar

Scelle, G., 1956. ‘Le phénomène juridique du dédoublement fonctionnel’, in Schätzel, W. and Schlochauer, H. (eds.), Rechtsfragen der Internationalen Organisation: Festschrift für Hans Wehberg, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 324–342Google Scholar

Simma, B. and Paulus, A., 1998. ‘The “International Community”: Facing the Challenge of Globalisation’, European Journal of International Law, 9(2), 266–277CrossRef Google Scholar

Simpson, G., 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order, Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Slaughter, A. -M., 1995. ‘International Law in a World of Liberal States’, European Journal of International Law, 6(1), 503–538CrossRef Google Scholar

Slaughter, A. -M., 1997. ‘The Real New World Order’, Foreign Affairs, 76(5), 183–197CrossRef Google Scholar

Vagts, D., 2001. ‘Hegemonic International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 95, 843–848CrossRef Google Scholar

van Vollenhoven, C., 1936. The Law of Peace, London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Wendt, A., 1999. Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, G., 1945. ‘International Law and the Controversy Concerning the Word “Law”’, British Yearbook of International Law, 22, 146–163Google Scholar

de Witte, B., 1994. ‘Rules of Change in International Law: How Special Is the European Community?’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 25, 299–333CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

3 - International law as law

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive