from PART II - INSTITUTIONS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
For almost the first half-century since its creation under the United Nations Charter in 1945, the United Nations Security Council spent relatively little of its time focusing on matters of international criminal justice. The Security Council is first and foremost the guardian of international peace and security under the Charter. It has attempted to fulfil that responsibility during a long and controversial history of mandating compliance with international law, imposing economic sanctions to coax recalcitrant nations towards acceptable behaviour, setting up peacekeeping operations to facilitate implementation of peace settlements or to defuse violent stand-offs between warring parties, and approving peace enforcement actions that might delegate to national military combat forces the task of intervening in an armed conflict or humanitarian calamity with the aim of ending it.
Original intent
One would be hard pressed to find anything, even inferentially, in the travaux préparatoires, or negotiating records, of the United Nations Charter – either at Dumbarton Oaks in 1944 or San Francisco one year later – that points to establishing the Security Council for the purpose of building international criminal tribunals or using judicial tools to compel compliance by individuals (of whatever allegiance). Rather, as with its predecessor, the Permanent Court of International Justice under the League of Nations, the International Court of Justice was conceived as the UN Charter's instrument of judicial remedies. But the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice is directed towards the conduct of UN Member States and their governments and thus entails State responsibility. Absent is the typically domestic task of criminal justice that disciplines individuals for well-defined and actionable crimes. One may safely assume, based on any evidence to the contrary, that as the Second World War came to a close and the United Nations emerged from that global war's massive assault on humankind, the idea of using the Security Council to promote international criminal justice simply had not registered with the founders of the United Nations.
Soon, however, the United Nations International Law Commission, responding to a request by the General Assembly, adopted the Nuremberg principles in 1950, thus confirming that there was broad international endorsement of the illegality of atrocity crimes, namely, genocide, crimes against humanity, and serious war crimes following the Nuremberg military tribunal trials.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.