Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:45:13.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Investment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2009

Simon Lester
Affiliation:
WorldTradeLaw.net, LLC
Bryan Mercurio
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter addresses the legal and policy issues arising out of Bilateral and Regional Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Investment Chapters.

Part II commences with an examination of the history of treaty-based legal protections for foreign investment. This Part traces the evolution of investment provisions, from Treaties of Friendship, Navigation and Commerce (FNC), through to Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs), and their most recent incorporation into Investment Chapters in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs).

Part III considers how the different definition of phrases such as ‘investor’ and ‘investment’ determine the scope of FTA Investment Chapters. This Part therefore inquires into who the investment chapter applies to, and what will constitute an investment for the purpose of the chapter.

Part IV continues the analysis of States’ commitments in the FTA Investment Chapter, but with a focus on their substantive commitments.

Part V focuses on investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions in FTA investment chapters and outlines the main elements and differences between the ISDS provisions in different FTA Investment Chapters. It also explains how these ISDS provisions use, and rely on, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Convention, Regulations and Rules (‘ICSID Convention’).

Part VI outlines the different architectures of FTA Investment Chapters, with a focus on whether States schedule their market access commitments in the form of either a positive or negative list.

Type
Chapter
Information
Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements
Commentary and Analysis
, pp. 215 - 273
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, Raymond D., Crawford, James and Reisman, Michael W. (eds.), Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials, Commentary (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005), at p. 3.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., ‘The Bilateral Investment Treaty Program of the United States’ (1988) 21 Cornell International Law Journal201–76, at 208.Google Scholar
Shea, Donald R., The Calvo Clause. A Problem of Inter-American and International Law and Diplomacy (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1955), at p. 17.Google Scholar
Steiner, Henry J., Vagts, Detlev F. and Koh, Harold H., Transnational Legal Problems: Materials and Text, 4th edn (Westbury, New York: Foundation Press, 1994), at pp. 456–7.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., World Trade and the Law of the GATT (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1969), at p. 37Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law (London: Cameron May, 1999)Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., ‘A Brief History of International Investment Agreements’ (2005) 12(1) University of California Davis Journal of International Law & Policy157–94, at 166.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001), at p. 308.Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W., ‘BIT by BIT: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries’ (1990) 24 International Law655–75, at 657.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., ‘Of Politics and Markets: The Shifting Ideology of the BITS’ (1993) 11 International Tax & Business Law159–86, at 182.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H., The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), at pp. 391 and 398.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Jürgen, ‘A General Investment Agreement in the WTO? Lessons from Chapter 11 of NAFTA and the OECD Multilateral Agreement on Investment’ (2002) 23(4) University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law713–89.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael J. and Howse, Robert, The Regulation of International Trade, 3rd edn (London: Routledge, 2005), at pp. 457–60Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, International Investment Arrangements: Trends and Emerging Issues (New York and Geneva: UN, 2006), at p. 8Google Scholar
Ya Qin, Julia, ‘Defining Nondiscrimination Under The Law Of The World Trade Organization’ (2005) 23(2) Boston University International Law Journal215–97Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., ‘GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for an “Aim and Effects” Test’ (1998) 32 The International Lawyer619–49Google Scholar
Regan, Donald H., ‘Further Thoughts on the Role of Regulatory Purpose Under Article III of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’ (2003) 37(5) Journal of World Trade737–60Google Scholar
Regan, Donald H., ‘Regulatory Purpose and “Like Products” in Article III.4 of the GATT (With Additional Remarks on Article III:2)’ (2002) 36(3) Journal of World Trade443–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Weiler, Joseph H.H., ‘EC Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products’ (2004) 3(1) World Trade Review129–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘Still Hazy After All These Years: The Interpretation of National Treatment in the GATT/WTO Case-Law on Tax Discrimination’ (2004) 15(1) European Journal of International Law39–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voon, Tania, Cultural Products and the World Trade Organization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert, ‘The Appellate Body Ruling in the Shrimp/Turtle Case: A New Legal Baseline for the Trade and Environment Debate’ (2002) 27(2) Columbia Journal of Environmental Law491–521, at 503.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Jurgen, ‘The MFN Standard and Foreign Investment – An Uneasy Fit?’ (2005) 5(6) Journal of World Investment and Trade861–86Google Scholar
Schwartz, Warren F. and Sykes, Alan O., ‘The Economics of the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause’, in Bhandari, Jagdeep S. and Sykes, Alan O. (eds.), Economic Dimension in International Law: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), at p. 59.Google Scholar
White, James B., Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), at p. 113.Google Scholar
Ortino, Federico, ‘Treaty Interpretation and the WTO Appellate Body Report in US–Gambling: A Critique’ (2006) 9(1) Journal of International Economic Law117–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert L. and Regan, Donald H., ‘The Product/Process Distinction – An Illusory Basis for Disciplining “Unilateralism” in Trade Policy’ (2000) 11(2) European Journal of International Law249–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, F.A., ‘British Treaties for the Promotion and Protection of Investments’ (1981) 52 British Yearbook of International Law241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UNCTAD, Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Mid-1990s (New York and Geneva: UN, 1998).Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, Georgio, ‘Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection’ (1997) 269 Recueil des Cours251–460, at 347.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Indirect Expropriations: New Developments?’ (2002) 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal64–93, at 64.Google Scholar
Hackworth, Green H., Digest of International Law (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1940–44), vol. 3Google Scholar
Garcia-Amador, F.V., Special Rapporteur, ‘State Responsibility’, in Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1959 (New York: UN, 1960) vol. II, UN Doc. A/CN.4/119, para. 59.Google Scholar
Maniruzzaman, Abul F.M.Expropriation of Alien Property and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in International Law of Foreign Investment: An Overview’ (1998) 8(1) Journal of Transnational Law & Policy57–78, at 69.Google Scholar
Domke, Martin, ‘Foreign Nationalizations: Some Aspects of Contemporary International Law’ (1961) 55(3) American Journal of International Law585–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Been, Vicki L. and Beauvais, Joel C., ‘The Global Fifth Amendment? NAFTA's Investment Protections and the Misguided Quest for an International “Regulatory Takings” Doctrine’ (2003) 78 New York University Law Review30–143, at 132.Google Scholar
Christie, George C., ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property Under International Law?’ (1962) 38 British Yearbook of International Law307–38, at 338.Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law’ (1982-III) 176 Recueil des Cours259–392, at 276.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew, ‘The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law’ (2005) 20(1) ICSID Review–Foreign Investment Law Journal1, at 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘The Impact of International Investment Treaties on Domestic Administrative Law’ (2004–2005) 37(4) New York University Journal of International Law & Politics953–72, at 954.Google Scholar
Mountfield, Helen, ‘Regulatory Expropriations in Europe: The Approach of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2002) 11(1) New York University Environmental Law Journal136–47Google Scholar
Weiner, Allen S., ‘Indirect Expropriation: The Need for a Taxonomy of “Legitimate” Regulatory Purposes’ (2003) 5(3) International Law Forum (Du Droit International)166–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, William S., ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement Between Developed Countries: Reflections on the Australia–United States Free Trade Agreement’ (2006) 39(1) Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law1–38Google Scholar
Capling, Ann and Nossal, Kim R., ‘Blowback: Investor-State Dispute Mechanisms in International Trade Agreements’ (2006) 19(2) Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions151–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UNCTAD, Investment Provisions in Economic Integration Agreements (New York and Geneva: UN, 2006), at p. 119.Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, Trade and Development Report 2006 (New York and Geneva: UN, 2006)Google Scholar
,UNCTAD, World Investment Report 1996: Investment, Trade and International Policy Arrangements (New York and Geneva: UN, 1996).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Adding Sweeteners to Softwood Lumber: The WTO–NAFTA “Spaghetti Bowl” is Cooking’ (2006) 9(1) Journal of International Economic Law197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Susan D., ‘The Nature and Enforcement of Investor Rights under Investment Treaties: Do Investment Treaties have a Bright Future?’ (2005) 12(1) University of California Davis Journal Of International Law & Policy47–100Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×